nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Frames, why not?

Gordon

I did a search on this forum and couldn't find good evidence as to why frames are not liked by the webmasters of the world..

I'm making a site with a flash dropdown navigation menu and I'd like the menu to be on a frame on the side that references the main html pages. The reason I need a frame for the dropdown flash menu is so that the dropdown tree of the menu stays dropped (opened) on the specific menu choice. Otherwise on a non framed page the flash menu would just refresh and start over again.

I'm going to make a non flash menu along the top within the main page so that users without flash can utilise the site. And also a noframe tag to force this page if the user cant handle frames.

However, I read that frames shouldn't be used generally. Are frames such a bad thing?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Gordon

rsynnott wrote:

Er, you're joking, right? Right?

Indeed

rsynnott

Gordon wrote:

Indeed

Ah, right, never quite know with you...

Gordon

rsynnott wrote:

Ah, right, never quite know with you...

Tell me about it, I have to live with me!