Stekelly wrote: Saying over 21's only is clearly age discrimination though.
Bottle_of_Smoke wrote: I just don't see why an off licence would do that, a club maybe - they'll keep you out to have an over 21's image, but an off-licence - they're just losing money
Jetpilot wrote: Hey, I actually work in an over 21's off licence so ill try and clear some stuff up. Nope it isnt, because all the off licences that are 21's are 21's based on the amount of fake i'd's recieved, so we arent saying we cant serve you because you are 21, we are actually saying we cant accept any form of ID with an age under 21 on it. That was prob me, im sorry you couldnt get your beers but the fact is serving you can lose me my job! The money lost is nothing compared to the the money that can be lost due to law suits from underage drinking, or being shut down (as happened to another off licence in my area) __________________
Bottle_of_Smoke wrote: I sincerely hope you're caught serving someone with a fake ID that says they're 22.
Jetpilot wrote: That was prob me, im sorry you couldnt get your beers but the fact is serving you can lose me my job!
steveland? wrote: It's also annoying as hell when people go moaning about being refused when it's well within our rights as barmen to do it (well not anymore... damn unemployment ). Whinging isn't going to change it and there's pretty much nothing you can do about it short of objecting to their licence renewal which is just going to get ignored anyway because the "powers that be" know how difficult it is to spot fake IDs and underagers.
Bottle_of_Smoke wrote: Might work for a while but if every off licence was to do that then everyone on the other side would get fake IDs saying they're 21.
Bottle_of_Smoke wrote: Justifying it because of fake IDs is just silly, extremely flawed plan.
steveland? wrote: I hate when people think that being refused is something personal... it's usually just to cover the pub's own ass.
quarryman wrote: it took him 2 years of lurking to pluck up the courage to post that. a bit harsh?
chump wrote: What are you talkin about, there are other boards on here you know. And as for my comment, he wrote confidently (not stating it was his opinion etc etc..) about something that he was completely wrong about.