pete wrote: won't someone please think of wexford?
ishmael whale wrote: http://www.breakingnews.ie/2004/09/17/story166969.html There’s an amount of coverage saying that 9,500 Dublin-based civil and public servants have applied. Sometimes the same article (such as the one above) goes on to say 3,700 are Dublin based and 3,350 are in provincial locations. 3,700 plus 3,350 gives a national figure of 7,050. Without even looking at any other information, it should be possible to notice that either: 3,700 Dublin based civil servants have applied, and the figure of 9,500 ‘Dublin based’ is wrong or 7,050 civil servants nationally have applied, which means the figure of 9,500 is still wrong even if it was meant to refer to all civil servants, not just Dublin based ones (i.e. who are the extra 2,450). It just shows how easy it is to start a spin - no-one seems to read the thing twice.
pete wrote: actually it looks like Wexford may get their pound of flesh - 249 Environment jobs available there, with 224 applicants Unfortunately only 16 of the 224 applicants currently work in Environment..... ah, but sure why worry about service levels. The other 208 are probably quick learners.
cyclopath2001 wrote: Even the figures for staff offering to move with their own department should be questioned: Some departments have quite a wide range of work and just because you work in a particular department does not mean you'd be any better at doing a specialised job in the same department than somebody from outside of the department. For example, Kildare needs 380 IT specialists, of 114 volunteers, only 76 people from Revenue have volunteered. No figure is available for how many of the volunteers have any IT skills or experience.
cyclopath2001 wrote: The Government has €90m from the sale of former State offices which has been earmarked to assist decentralisation.
THE cost of providing 53 new office buildings for the decentralisation plan could amount to more than €1.5 billion over 25 years. ... Although the construction of offices to house 10,300 decentralised staff will be funded by the private sector, the Government is planning to lease the properties back at an estimated cost of €50m to €60m annually.
cyclopath2001 wrote: No doubt, the rents on the buildings will be going into the local community and not to Dublin-based property companies?
cyclopath2001 wrote: The Iriish Independent is much more optimistic than the Examiner, possiby because they've never let the facts get in the way of a whatever story its masters want written. They totally ignored the number of applicants who do not work in Dublin or the liklihood that someone who applies for Drogheda & is disappointed cannot be counted on to go to a less favoured location. The Indo makes plenty of assertions of its own without offering any reason why we should believe them:
Stung by criticisms that the decentralisation scheme proposed by outgoing Finance Minister Charlie McCreevy was unworkable, ministers seized on the increased number of applications to explore how one or two "showpiece" moves could be accelerated. ... While the focus is likely to centre on locations within striking distance of the capital, it is thought at least one other further location such as Kerry or Cavan will be targeted to ensure balance.
NewDubliner wrote: How come they didn't volunteer to move to Kildare?
smccarrick wrote: Most of us have done so- but not to IT positions- as we are ineligible to apply for them, regardless of our qualifications S.
NewDubliner wrote: What were the eligibility criteria? I saw that there might be a selection process, but they just seemed to be inviting anyone with an interest in working in Kildare & didn't indicate any specific IT job descriptions.
smccarrick wrote: Sorry- you're wrong. On the CAF application- you were applying for locations, as opposed to positions. Included on the form you had to put your current rank and location. There was a big row with some of the unions over it- as they suspected that some of their staff who were getting allowances (notably IT and Revenue staff) might loose those allowances were they to move. It was noted as the allowance being granted to the person, as opposed to the job, and were someone else to take that position, they must have similar current entitlements, or else they would face a discrimatory position of doing similar work as their peers, but on a lower payscale.