https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/jun/13/israel-iran-strikes-defence-minister-tehran-middle-east-live
Reports stating that Israel have launched an attack against Iran
He's a Putin propagandist working for RT (Russia Today), the main pro-war Putin support channel. There's plenty of them around. Our own Chay Bowes being one.
Does working as a propagandist for Vladimer Putin qualify you as a Journalist?
It's not remotely baffling. Israel has by far the most organised and vicious propaganda lobby of any state on earth and they have vast influence and power over the western mainstream media and business speheres and as a result over western politics. There isn't another state with an even remotely comparable lobby.
Keir Starmer wanted to win an election as Labour party leader. He understood that the price of that was capitulation to the Israel lobby, and the Israel lobby basically taking over and purging the Labour party of any challenge to Israel.
Had Starmer not done that he wouldn't have even lasted to the 2024 election as leader, never mind winning it, because he would have been continuously smeared by almost the entirety of mainstream British media as an anti-semite, and the Tories would have been re-elected by default in 2024.
Israel's dirty secret is that it admired the Nazi's modus operandi, and they copied it, first of all in violent terms to get the state formed, then propaganda terms, and then again, in ever increasing amounts through the decades, they've copied their violence, bellicosity and military rapciousness, never more so than now.
When did Qatar move to Europe?
The Hamas suicide bombings didn't come out of nowhere, much like the violence of the Provos didn't come out of nowhere.
Israel also openly manipulated the situation so the most extreme elements in Palestinian politics and ideology would be promoted and the more moderate elements sidelined.
Israel wanted an enemy which wanted violence because it itself wanted to violently crush any chance of a Palestinian state or civil society and steal the land. It's far easier to do that when you have an opponent which the world considers unreasonable.
Yes, I think there was that counterintuitive aspect at play.
The idea that Israel didn't want the relatively moderate PLO, and so was happy to feed the extremists of Hamas, may very well have some truth to it. For the exact reasons that you say.
The exact same reason Israel and her proxies target negotiators
Has there been any confirmation by any normal media?
Seeing how this guy if he exists is claimed to be a Russia Today “journalist” and there is no geolocation how do you know it’s not AI content you are reposting or from somewhere else?
The only ones pushing this are Russia Today and sites who just regurgitated this without further confirmation
https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/ce9mz0gl8z7o
The BBC have stated that they have verified the footage.
Footage from Russian state broadcaster RT has captured the moment a missile lands just a few feet from where its reporter was broadcasting in southern Lebanon.
RT, formerly Russia Today, said Steve Sweeney, its Lebanon bureau chief, and his cameraman had "miraculously survived" and were being treated in hospital.
The BBC has verified the footage.
There have been ongoing Israeli air strikes and ground operations in southern Lebanon.
F-35 hit by Iran but survived and made an emergency landing. Oil refinery hit in Haifa. A lot of American and Israeli might is based around the idea of invincibility and their populations are used to that.
Their Navy is too afraid to even get involved.
Thanks good find!
It's on the BBC. Obviously you condemn attacks on journalists, even if they work for Russian media.
@ARseboxing . ”Israel's dirty secret is that it admired the Nazi's modus operandi, and they copied it, first of all in violent terms to get the state formed, then propaganda terms, and then again, in ever increasing amounts through the decades, they've copied their violence, bellicosity and military rapciousness, never more so than now.” I wonder what would have happened if the Arab countries didnt start a war in 1948 and again in 1966. What if they actually allowed the Palestinian state to be formed even with the 40-45% of the land on offer. Would they be in a better position today ?
Because even now, their great friends in Lebanon refuse to grant them citizenship or full integration into society, and at this stage some have to be 3rd or not 4th generation born in Lebanese refugee camps.
How exactly do you attack a gas field ?
The definition of a journalist has become vague in recent years.
In Ireland, we have our right-wing citizen journalists, do you consider them to be fully journalists? The likes of Philip Dwyer for example?
I consider any journalist to be a journalist, regardless of their political persuasion.
”The Israelis have built up quite an effective machine in that way.”….. just look at how rabidly they attacked Ireland for refusing to partake in a song contest with them.
Jesus Christ, an actual professional journalist and the camera man were bombed by Israel and we still have people handwaving it away with whataboutery.
Some have no shame due to their love for the IDF.
Absolutely nobody who works for RT is an actual journalist.
He still obviously shouldn't have been targeted (if indeed he was) and Israel's general tactics around this seem well formed.
Pretty good example of doing a bad thing to a terrible person doesn't make you right.
Does this consideration of yours extend to the deaths of journalists actually killed by Russia in their little colonial war? Including one Irish journalist
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_journalists_killed_during_the_Russo-Ukrainian_war
Hell will freeze over before you will get any condemnation of that from zionist shills
”Their Navy is too afraid to even get involved.” which navy?
Some journalists are not journalists, they are activists. Philip Dwyer is a clear example, there are many others out there as well.
Does his presence in Lebanon doing a broadcast deem him to be a terrible person?
Working for RT does.
So you disagree with his employer and that makes him a terrible person?
So the same people that condemn Iran for attacking civilians don't have issue with a journalist (even if you believe them to be a citizen journalist or propagandist) being attacked by Israel as they don't like who they work for.
Complete hypocrites.
The whole thread is full of a sweeping statements about populations of multiple countries numbering in hundreds of millions and how they are terrible due to their political leadership and militaries including us “westerners”
One doesn’t even have to scroll too far back for examples
He shouldn’t have been attacked, and hopefully not badly injured (unlike all the journalists that Iran and Russia routinely killed), but I wouldn’t shed a tear either seeing how he is part of a propaganda machine who wants to destroy our way of life and loudly say so every single day
It is a propaganda outfit for one of the worst regimes on the planet. They are actively involved in torture. They actively work to destabilise the West. Working for them makes you a terrible person yes.
Clearly that doesnt justify what happened as I already said. Its not clear it was deliberate, but would hardly be surprising if it was.
So do you have any issue with the journalist and cameraman being attacked by Israel?
Or are we going to get the usual "we can't be sure they were targeted" line?
That wasn't said by anyone. We have seen propaganda from several sides (Ukraine, Russia, Israel, Hamas) over the last few years about the number of "journalists" killed by those opposing them. We used to have clear ways of identifying journalists rather than propagandists - membership of organisations like the NUJ. I am not proposing we do this again, but in the past, such propagandists ended up being hanged.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Joyce
Look up William Joyce, Lord Haw-Haw, link seems broken