Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

Options
1176117621764176617672009

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Great. Progress. So you accept the rulings of courts like the ICJ and ICC.

    Or do you only accept the jurisdiction of Israeli courts?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Where did I say either of those?

    Let us leave it to the lawyers and the judges.

    As for the political issues, we can have discussions on those, so where are you with the peace deal?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,633 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    Did you see that map I posted. Israel have been land grabbing for decades, Netanyahu supported the funding of Hamas to prevent a unified Palestine and a 2 state solution. This "war" didn't start last yr, it's being going on decades.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The whole world, other than Iran and some posters on here, are urging Hamas to lay down their arms and accept the deal. This is the only deal on the table. The Japanese Emperor faced a similar dilemma at the end of WW2, surrender or face the destruction of his country. He surrendered because he put the welfare of his own people ahead of his survival. It isn't as bleak as that for Hamas, but Trump has been clear, all bets are off if they reject this.

    Oh by the way, when you say the other party, who do you mean? Hamas? The Palestinian Authority? The Palestinian people? In a fantasy world there are equal negotiations. In the real world, there is this deal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    I’m really trying to understand what you are trying to say. Are you suggesting that Israel has never been found, by any court, to be in breach of international law.

    Is that your understanding??

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Their head is well and truly in the sand.

    Refusal to read a UN report to feign ignorance.

    Carefully selecting which questions to answer and then demanding answers or answering their own questions on behalf of other posters.

    Their hypocrisy and lack of shame is mind blowing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,024 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    First of all - who?

    There aren't any on here who are looking for a "complete Hamas victory". That's just another lie from a known liar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    There hasn't been a full hearing, only an advisory opinion. Israel haven't been there to present their defence. Do you accept, for example, the French court conviction of Ian Bailey in absentia, when an Irish court refused to convict him or even extradite him?

    So leave all that legalese to the lawyers and the courts. Instead, focus on the current political issues, and tell us whether you support the deal on the table.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Israel haven't been there to present their defence.

    But yet you're ok with Palestine having no say in negotiations on a peace deal? Funny that.

    As I said your hypocrisy and lack of shame is mind blowing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    This isn’t true Blanch.
    In the 2004 Wall case, there was a full hearing at which Israel was fully represented and offered a defence which was rejected by the ICJ who found them to be in breach of international law.
    14 out of 15 judges found Israel to be in breach of international law. When you say it should be left to the courts and the judges to determine this, why do you then dismiss the rulings of the judges and the findings of the court.
    If Israel had been found to be in compliance of international law by the ICJ would you also be dismissing this?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Do you understand the difference between political and legal?

    From what I can see, the only Palestinians yet to accept the deal are Hamas. Are you equating Hamas with Palestinians?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Not aware of the Wall case, will have to look it up.

    That still doesn't prevent you from commenting on the current political deal on the table.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Italian leader asks the " activists " to call off the flotilla and deliver aid somewhere else. What's the big deal with delivering food and medicine to a city that is being starved to death, they will be heading off home in 2 days once they have unloaded everything.

    They should be supported by everyone for doing something like this and trying to help.

    Niccolò Machiavelli :

    "To ally with great powers to defeat your neighbour is a strategic trap; if you win, you become the slave of the greater power; if the allied power is defeated, you remain alone and defenceless against the angry neighbour, and you are destroyed." - Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,591 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    I'll use your under hand tactic and answer a question with a question, why do you refuse to read the UN report?

    Why do you refuse to give an opinion on genocide, man made famine, murder and starvation of innocent civilians by Israel?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Unlike some posters I don’t like to give my opinion on issues until I have adequately informed my opinion.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,661 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    Where do I stand on what? I'm not sure what your question is

    This not a deal, it's an ultimatum under threat of destruction of Gazans (not Hamas).

    Hence, there is no choice here but to accept, or face destruction.

    The more pertinent question is - if Hamas (a terrorist organisation who we all agree do not have the welfare of Gazans in their choices) refuse it, do you agree Gazan civilians deserve to be destroyed for it? Does that not disturb you?

    Answer the above pls, if you have even a screed of honesty in you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,387 ✭✭✭Spudmonkey


    Punching smoke man, punching smoke…

    A complete and utter waste of time…



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 4,910 Mod ✭✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I support the flotilla in theory but I remember 2010 when crew were killed by the IDF. I would be worried that could happen again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,661 ✭✭✭Miniegg




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,894 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Of course the genocide, the land grabs, the displacement of millions is auful, I don't think any right minded people would think otherwise. It is, however the way a lot of modern countries borders are today

    Don't get me wrong either. Ideally the UN mandated borders from 1947 with the common economic union should be the end goal with displaced people on both sides compensated in order to bring about peace



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,519 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Israel was directed by the ICJ last year, twice, to ensure sufficient humanitarian aid was provided to Gazans in order to prevent Genocide.

    Those directives still stand.

    If Israel are now using the provision of aid as a bargaining chip, it is yet more proof (not that any more is required of course) of the Israeli Gaza Genocide. The ICJ can therefore only come to one verdict - that Israel has de facto committed Genocide.

    That will fully copper-fasten what the world already knows - Israel is a warmongering Genocidal State, a world pariah to be shunned for decades as punishment for being the most inhumane country on this planet, ever.

    Netanyahu and his govt have dragged Israel into the Stone Age. Perhaps Israelis should rise up and turf out these monsters. Just like the Palestinians must turf out Hamas.

    Hamas and the Israeli Govt/IDF are identical in their MO - terrorism of their civilian populations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 716 ✭✭✭Lawlesz


    Pretty disappointing to see the genocide defenders crawl back out from under their rock and act as though Israel, and by extension the posters themselves, are somehow vindicated by the so-called “deal” on the table. They disappeared for weeks, while the rest of the world turned its back on Israel and defending the indefensible became harder and harder.

    For months, they’ve refused to condemn starvation, indiscriminate bombing, or even acknowledge reports confirming what’s happening. Instead, they obfuscate every discussion: dodging clear yes-or-no questions, nitpicking semantics, and derailing the thread and debate with irrelevant whataboutery. In the last hour alone, we have gone from Japanese emperors to Ian Bailey, ffs. Demanding answers from others, putting words in peoples mouths while they themselves avoid the most basic questioning.

    And now, anyone expressing legitimate concerns about this “deal” is being misrepresented, labelled as Hamas supporters, the usual nonsense. Let’s not forget, the deal was drawn up by the butcher who starved and massacred innocent children, flattened Gaza, and by a corrupt fascist leader who openly talks about seizing Gaza as real estate. It was created with zero input from the people it concerns most… the innocent Palestinians. That’s not a deal, it’s an ultimatum. Sign it or else.

    We’re supposed to take this at face value? It’s obviously a way for Israel to secure what it always wanted, while escaping accountability for what it has done. And if all else fails, they’ll just return to indiscriminate bombing. No honest broker would present this as anything resembling a fair deal.

    And for the record: I, and virtually every other anti-genocide poster here, have always said the same thing. Hamas should lay down their arms. Hamas should release the hostages. Despite what the usual cohort claims, that has always been the consensus here. It is possible to call out both sides in this barbarity, try it some time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Of course it will disturb me if the war continues, but that will be by the choice of Hamas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,002 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    So you think we should stop the genocide in 10 years time? Ok got it.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,519 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    What sustained attack was this?

    I don't recall recall 60,000 Israelis being slaughtered or starved, Israel press and medics being executed and the likes of Tel Aviv and Galilee being turned to dust?

    Or is that just the typical pro-Israeli hysterical hyperbole and Hasbara?

    Sustained attack? There's only been one sustained attack in the last 2 years and that's been from Israel.

    And as we are all acutely aware, because the Israeli govt has continuously stated it plus acted on it, they definitely will never accept a two-state solution. Recall the apoplectic Israeli rage when numerous states recognised Palestine recently - nope, they don't want it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,024 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 57,077 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    It is a take it or be bombed into oblivion deal. Those deals usually fail because they are made under threat. Arabs will never see Tony Blair as anything other than The Butcher of Baghdad after the WMD lies and deaths of millions. Whoever picked him to manage a peace agreement was simply mad or ill-advised. The citizens of Gaza would obviously grasp at anything that stops the genocide but what happens afterwards when the IDF don't leave Gaza and there is no Palestine state ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,192 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    I'm a bit behind on all this, but is the deal one that had no negotiation from both sides? If Hamas were to unilaterally create a "deal" and offer it to Israel, would Israel be solely responsible for continuing the war by not accepting, regardless of how punitive it was?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,024 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    If, by some miracle, HAMAS were in a position to offer Israel the same type of ultimatum that the Palestinians are being presented with, you could bet your bottom dollar that the poster you're replying to would be singing a completely different tune. Such is the dishonesty of their position(s).



Advertisement
Advertisement