A girl I work with lives in Blanchardstown, she drives daily to Summerhill in her car. Why t f?
What’s wrong with a modest hatch back?
She’s unmarried and no kids. What the f does she need it for?
You should compare Ireland's footprint to a city in China of 5M people. And I don't care about the global warming thing. Sea levels are rising at a rate it'll take a thousand years to go up 1M which is part of a natural cycle anyway.
What I care about is my children breathing in diesel fumes. And an unnecessary amount when you factor in the complete overkill when some people buy cars.
More accurately they are bought predominantly by contractors, farmers and business owners due to their very favourable taxation. However, a significant proportion of the high spec rangers models and similar from other brands rarely mount a footpath.
One wonders why a Govt hell bent on flailing the private ICE car buyer (while incongruously incentivising the purchase of ever increasing in size and power EVs) in order to save society and the world allows the self employed and businesses to so flagrantly desecrate it with such impunity.
It's not a 2 year old truck…it's far older
How many Ford Ranger's are doing school runs? They're typically driven by contractors, farmers and business owners.
Everything in life involves some level of risk, and while yes you should always try to reduce or minimise that risk, there is a point where those attempts become counterproductive to the needs that still need to be met.
There's also a level of personal responsibility and accountability that's missing here. While it's easy to blame and demonise motorists, pedestrians walking out in front of traffic, cyclists (and motorbikes) weaving in between traffic, and all presuming that the motorist can and will "take care of them" is a mistake as well.
Fundamentally though the real issue here seems to be that some don't like what others choose to drive more than anything.
It was a two year old truck and not a dint on it, I reckon the most action it's seen is driving through a few rain filled potholes in an unpaved carpark.
Total roidrover.
don’t believe I did. EuroNcap determined that a vehicle with 5 stars is excellent within their checking criteria for this one part of their testing we are talking about - pedestrian safety, It was not my opinion it is a statement of fact, think you should take up your gripes with them.
Pedestrians can only be kept 100% safe if all vehicles of every shape, size and battery or ice are consigned to history but wait they could be hit by a bicycle, ban them too.
they've got a snorkel on their car, they must ford (boom boom) a lot of rivers.
Some people buy them to make a statement, the bumper stickers on this one in Cork were very Trumpy, sorry I didn't take a pic of them but that's want they want.
Saw one yesterday, looked like a Ford Ranger pickup truck in bright blue, dark alloys with a very glamorous young woman driving it, and a custom licence plate too: "J0a55n3" or something…. Total ego trip vanity vehicle!
maybe you misunderstood me? you suggested these cars have 'excellent safety' for pedestrians. my point was that what makes them excellent is usually a marginal gain. or in short - 'more safe' does not equal 'safe' (which is what 'excellent safety' would usually imply)
You monster! A reliant robin should be be more than enough for you! 😉
Ireland is not suitable for pickup trucks... The weather, and stealing off the back. It's purely an image thing.
right so, there is no convincing some people, on that logic we should all sell our cars and return to shanks mare.
The green party are the boogeyman for a section of old conservative codgers in this country. Similar types to spew out all the buzzwords like the woke, liberals, leafy green suburbs etc
Literally lives in peoples heads rent free. Reality is green partys impact has been minimal. For gods sake they were a party of 12 TDs in the last government, if they had half the impact claimed by posters here they will have been the most impactful party in the history of the dail.
You can drive it if you want, like you said it's legal.. Probably costs a lot to tax, insure, maintain/fuel, doesn't fit reasonably into parking spaces, takes up a lot of room on the city streets and also pumps out Diesel fumes for everyone else to enjoy.. but sure you're alright Jack.
I have no problem with any pick up truck when it's got the same footprint as an average car.
There's no excuse for a Ford Ranger with crew cab being a school run machine.
Still seems to me that that's your bigger issue - people buying cars they want/for "status" but dressing it up as civic concern.
I drive a nice 3 litre diesel Audi A7. It often has just me in it. I'm worse than Hitler or something, right?
Is there a particular anger against pick-up trucks.. beyond the SUV hatred?
Just cos large vehicles are legal doesn't force you to purchase one? And like you have just confirmed, others have to live with the consequences of people choosing vehicles more for status than actual suitability on the roads.
no car is 'safe' if it collides with a pedestrian at 50km/h.
a 5 star rating means 'as safe as we can currently make that scenario' but that does not mean 'safe'.
"Unsuitable, oversized, and unsafe" is an opinion. People are entitled to opinions, but that's all they are.
These vehicles pass the prevailing safety tests and legislation and EU type approvals etc, ergo they are deemed suitable for use by the public.
More than that, I'm quite happy to live in a society that allows people choices about how they spend their money and what cars they drive. Personally I can't stand small hatchbacks but I appreciate that a lot of people like them so work away!
I was replying to another post on here?
how did you get that from what was contributed, that is your interpretation and not what was stated.
So basically drive whatever completely unsuitable oversized and unsafe large car you like and FK everyone else? Nice…
NCAP uses a star rating system (1 to 5 stars) to represent the overall safety performance of a vehicle. A 5-star rating indicates excellent safety across all categories, including pedestrian protection, while a 3-star rating represents average safety.
5 stars is always better than 3 and newer cars with 5 stars are safer again for occupants and pedestrians than older cars that passed with 5 stars at the point in time they were assessed.
I bet that seemed clever when you posted it, but unfortunately we're still dealing with the fallout from their nonsense - and not just their most recent term.
I could go into Ryan and his impact on our Energy independence and security through his/their opposition to the LNG terminal, or Roderic's "come one, come all" tweets impact on our immigration numbers (with all the negative effects that's had) but those are for different parts of the site - suffice is to say that they've done a lot of damage to this country that has and will continue to be felt for a long time to come.
The Green Party did take a big hit in the last election, but they still have a healthy majority in your head.
yeah, i assume a 5 star rating for pedestrian safety is an 'as good as we can reasonably expect' rating.
it certainly doesn't mean there's an equal outcome for both passengers and pedestrians for cars with 5 star ratings in both, when it comes to a collision at 50km/h say.
NCAP is weighted far more toward occupant safety than pedestrian safety. A 5 star rating means feck all toward pedestrians, a 3 star NCAP can rank better toward pedestrians than a 5star.
