$200 is most definitely not "a completely made up number".
If you said $two-baziliadonnies then I'd agree that that was a completely made up number.
That said, I'd say what McG will be getting from that hypothetical fight would be closer to your $200 than $200m
It's not a red herring at all
Just a piece of evidence
Given his history, I'd say he has an uphill battle on his hands
It’s not evidence of any substance to disprove her allegation. It’s the job of defence to discredit, introduce, suggest, sully, twist, muddy..so red herring type “evidence” introduced to distract from the actual alleged crime.
the freaks have entered the building
who? Freaks who believe her or disbelieve her?
Of course it's evidence.
Dont be silly
The should really move this in camera
I didn’t say it wasn’t evidence. I said it was the type evidence to distract from the alleged crime. Red herring type evidence. Not all evidence is the same…has same impact, clarity, strength
It evidence of her actions post the incident
Now we haven't seen it, but given it's description it certainly doesn't help her case
surely you can understand that
It's not a red Herring in the slightest
The argument will be are these the actions of someone who had been raped, I think by both of them?
This is a fair argument
Ultimately, I don't know.
It will be interesting to see what the verdict is here.
yes, I get this. But when you factor in alcohol, drink, Garda interviews, sexual assault examinations, how the victim was when interviewed, this evidence presented by the defence becomes less meaningful..a point I made earlier.
There's people claiming he did
So there must be evidence of such
This would be a big black mark against him if he did
Been half following the case, has this Danielle one who was with her been interviewed in court yet? Surely, interesting to see what she says.
I don’t think she has testified yet. Her evidence will be important, but from what I read, she didn’t witness any sexual intimacy between the two of them.
The evidence the defense puts is just that evidence
Some is stronger than others
If the evidence was strong, the dpp would not have dropped it, the bruising etc looks terrible but we haven't heard the whole case
At this point it's hard to see what your argument is
It's kippers for breakfast
And I'll be avoiding heading back to a hotel room with McGregor for sure, no matter what the outcome
my argument? I’m not arguing anything. I simply am way more inclined to believe her story
If you aren't arguing something, then what are you doing
As am I ffs, I said he has an uphill battle, given history and the bruising
I'm also inclined to believe CCTV evidence
Which isn't capable of lying, if someone was claiming one thing then acting the other way I'd definitely take this on board
Now it's been one side of the argument, so I suppose we'll sit through the other side now
What's the point of having this in public, it's mad
having the case in public?
Isn’t justice supposed to be served in public, for the most part?
People will always say that..especially about someone as divisive ad CMcG. The DPP said no criminal charges but civil is a much lower burden or proof.
Well apparently Turki Alalshikh wants it to happen.
It's very odd for the DPP not to proceed with a case like this. There's been multiple cases like this with only the accuser and defendant.
Sadly, it's not, at all. The number of sexual assault cases that make it to trial is miniscule. And that's out of the relatively miniscule number that are even reported in the first place.
Notice how nobody answered my question. Anti-mma idiots all over this thread.
Because noone believes that he is being falsely accused 😁
Or possibly wouldn't feel like they are part of the believe her no matter what brigade even 😁
Any real evidence of this or this just your opinion?
There is plenty of real evidence of it printed every single year.
Fill your boots.
https://www.drcc.ie/news-resources/sexual-violence-information/sexual-offending/#:~:text=In%20general%2C%20just%20over%20a,conclude%20and%20charges%20are%20issued.
Really, dont think so, especially after the cross examinations this week & thats before we even see what the other witnesses have to say which id imagine to contradict her further. Also, from what ive read, it doesnt seem she speaks to her friend that she attended the party with anymore, interesting
From them, yes real imparting reporting there. Id like to see how they compiled their "data", how much of it is false accusations where the complainant later decided to withdraw and so on. Its not like they have a genuine vested interest in making the issue seem worse than it is
All of their data is from the CSO, which you'd know if you'd even bothered to open the link.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://www.boards.ie/applications/dashboard/design/images/banned.png)
