Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Irish politics discussion thread

Options
1196197199201202310

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,224 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    If they're able to establish that the person has already left, I assume those numbers should be available to report too?

    I'm aware the numbers will never line up totally, with even the best enforcement some will disappear into the black economy and there's an inherent delay from creating an order to enforcement but I would've expected that if the number of people who left before enforcement made things look much better, the Department would've pushed to report those numbers too?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,299 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    A great point.

    Can I ask you: do you think that the GP knew, or had an idea, in advance of joining the Govt in 2020, that they would suffer due to being the junior party in a coalition and being blamed, but that they joined the coalition anyways?

    What I mean is: did they willingly accept future losses of support / seats, make a sacrifice, to get policies implemented?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 46,328 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Given that the normal trend is that the smallest party in a coalition (unfairly) gets the brunt of the blame, I'd be surprised if they weren't aware of the potential backlash they'd get at the end of their term.

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Yes, I do believe that, because it happened before. They have a conviction about their politics that other parties lack. It doesn't matter to individuals if they lose seats, they come again the next time. Because they are thinking long-term, they don't have to be in government all the time but once they get in every second or third government, they make it count.

    It is far more effective than sitting on the opposition benches forever. From the Greens perspective, what does it matter if you are greatly reduced in numbers if you have made permanent changes that will last? This time around they have a large number of public transport projects at procurement stage, they have Locallink, they have progress on childcare, they have carbon tax embedded, etc.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,769 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The Gov should be making the decision on IP applicants as fast as is possible.

    More than 50% are bogus and should be detected within hours or days. Now whether that figure is 50% or 90%, the decision should be made as close to entry into the country as possible - preferably at the port or airport. [Passengers cannot get onto a Ryanair flight without a passport so how can they arrive at passport control without one?]

    Is it not better to make a decision to reject at the earliest opportunity than to let it hang on for an ultimate rejection after many years?

    Next for successful applicants, a support system should be put in place to teach English as a spoken and written language, and the opportunity to build on any skills or education that the applicant has. That way, they would be welcome and would contribute to their own lives and those of others.

    Instead, the Dept is scouring the country looking for accommodation that does not exist. Any failed applicants need to be moved out of the country as soon as possible - either by agreement, by assistance, or by deportation.

    Just to be certain, I do believe we should assist those fleeing from armed conflict as much as is required, and as much as we can. However, we cannot take everyone, worldwide, that falls into that category - or even that many.

    We should be guided by our friends in the EU.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,972 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Did the election thread get deleted?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,271 ✭✭✭MFPM


    Again, as I've previously stated the Greens made a few small gains in government, and they are about to pay an electoral price for it, hopefully, they'll return with as few seats as possible. It's been amusing watching the Hollywood actor, Mark Ruffalo in recent weeks lashing the Greens over fracked gas, he was wheeled out (among others) in 2020 to encourage GP members to jettison principal for a shot at power, now he's decrying their alleged betrayal. As an aside, he doesn't seem to have learned his lesson as he champions Kamala Harris for President in the hope she can be influenced on Palestine - good luck with that!!

    I think you can add the Greens in 2007 which was pure opportunism. They weren't necessary to government formation, BA brought them in any way, and they paid a huge price. It was great to see the likes of Dan Boyle lose his seat, and then Labour way back in 1992, too. Spring had lashed Haughey and FF continually and then, when it came to it, jumped into government with him, and they paid the price in 97, too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,866 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Paid

    Paid the price in the next election, but got policies implemented while in government.

    Surely it's better to have a seat at the table and get policies turned into government backed laws every 10 years or so rather than remaining pure but outside of government?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 28,440 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Fair question. I suspect the division of the 1,046 non-actioned cases into those who've left the country and those who've simply gone underground with any degree of precision would be quite hard. Plus, given the nature of the IRL-UK border, some of those who've left the country could have returned again (though not as asylum seekers, obviously.) And there's a limit to the amount of resources the Dept will want to put into investigating this, given that as far as their work is concerned the two groups are functionally identical — they're no longer seeking asylum, no longer claiming benefits, support or provision.

    An easier subset of the 1,046 to identify would be those where no action has been taken for policy reasons — humanitarian considerations (e.g. the person concerned is too ill to travel); practical problems (no country will agree to accept the rendition of the person concerned); etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,271 ✭✭✭MFPM


    There's an air of false equivalence about that choice as you acknowledged yourself with regards to Labour in 2011.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 33,400 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    People are making huge assumptions about what might have happened in 2011 if Labour had held out.

    An FG government supported by Ross, Healy-Raes and a few other gobsh1tes would have implemented unrestrained Toryism. Have yiz forgotten that the country was literally bankrupt? On one simple measure, the FG manifesto planned €5 billion in state assets selloffs. The Programme for Government with Labour brought this down to €2 billion. You'd be paying an entry fee to take a walk in a former Coillte forest if Labour had stayed out of Government. You'd have private sector control of the national grid if Labour had stayed out of Government. There would have been no marriage equality and repeal referendums if Labour had not pushed these hard. If you think the cuts to disability allowances and general welfare under that Government were bad, you ain't seen nuttin yet.

    The idea that Labour would have prospered by another term in opposition pretending to have all the answers about everything is nonsense.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Absolutely it is. Even though they are long gone, the PDs still get referenced in political debate. Why? Because they had an actual influence on policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,202 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    They weren't necessary to government formation, BA brought them in any way, and they paid a huge price.

    I remember taking on the phone to my dad after that government was formed, I noted the Irish Times were struggling to fill the allotted pages with coverage of another FF-PD government, imagine how hard they'd find it if the Greens weren't involved. He replied "Well that's kind of the point…"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,041 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Dan Boyle who lost his Dail seat in 2007, before the Greens entered government?

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,098 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    I don't think Labour helped themselves by Eamon Gilmore becoming invisible as Tánaiste and then the complete mess on messaging around water charges, it gave SF an in that they exploited.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,866 ✭✭✭✭dulpit




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,735 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    There would have been no marriage equality and repeal referendums if Labour had not pushed these hard.

    I don't think that's true, FG were fully behind them and Leo loved a referendum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,000 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    The Repeal referendum also being held 2 years after Labour were back out of Government



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76,224 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Varadkar did not become leader of FG until 2017. FG had no intention of putting the marriage equality referendum, which happened when Varadkar was a Minister, in to the Programme for Government.



  • Posts: 33,400 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    My post isn't a general defence of Labour in government. They certainly made mistakes.

    I'm just pointing out that FG in government unrestrained by Labour would have been a very different animal.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 33,400 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This Leo?

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/when-leo-varadkar-came-out-delays-hesitation-and-then-courage/37229592.html

    "It was January 27, 2010 - more than five years before the marriage equality referendum - when Leo decided to set out his stall. But if campaigners on marriage equality had been looking to Varadkar to champion their cause, they were left bitterly disappointed. His first speech on the issue was guarded. His contribution was littered with caveats and reservations about the potential impact of the bill in its current form. Civil partnership could have a number of unintended consequences, he warned. But, above all, single people should not have the right to adopt a child. "Every child has the right to a mother and father and, as much as is possible, the State should vindicate that right," Varadkar said in his Dail speech."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,735 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Yeah that Leo, like I said he loved a referendum, to his detriment. And like I also said, FG were fully behind the referendums, they approved them and could have prevented them if they wished.



  • Posts: 33,400 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    He was a long way off 'fully behind'. Were either of the referendums in FG manifestos?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,866 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    They could have prevented them, but were unlikely to push for them too..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,386 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Not before time. Was a ridiculous anachronism for quite a while.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,267 ✭✭✭Peter Flynt


    FF and FG voted for every green tax for the past five years.

    Now a matter of weeks before the election they are "joining forces" to block the Greens.

    These people in FF/FG think the voters are idiots.

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/fine-gael-and-fianna-fail-join-forces-to-block-green-partys-ridiculous-pollution-tax-on-drivers-before-election/a550272342.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,041 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    To be fair to Leo, he said on his first day as FG leader there'd be a repeal the 8th referendum within a year, and there was. It was a political boil that needed to be lanced.

    Post edited by Hotblack Desiato on

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,041 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Maybe, but they wouldn't have been anything like as extreme as you claimed if they ever had hopes to be elected again.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,769 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Great idea of VR to try to fool the Irish voters by saying he would appeal the ninth but then go ahead and appeal the eighth!

    Brilliant.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Even better that he was proposing to appeal them rather than repeal them.



Advertisement
Advertisement