Thats a convoluted way to confirm that they are Russian shills 😀
Some of the evidence given in the indictment is hilarious.
"Prosecutors said Tenet's founders "admitted to each other in their private communications that their 'investors' were, in truth and in fact, the 'Russians.'"
"When the company's fake backer, "Eduard Grigoriann," did not reply to a message about money, one of the founders allegedly Googled "time in Moscow."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-tenet-media-right-wing-influencers-justice-department/
Tim Pool's view on Ukraine: https://www.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/1f9504t/flashback_tim_pool_pounds_the_table_and_yells/Joe Rogan has a great bullshit detector to keep these fellas on the show.
It absolutely is not. Even the DOJ, through the indictment, have clearly stated that the content creators were decieved. This isn't difficult stuff to understand.
”useful idiots” is the term the Russians use.
I'm surprised Rogan hasn't had Trump on yet especially with Trump doing the podcast rounds on Theo Von,Shawn Ryan and the few others he appeared on
Maybe waiting for closer to the election to get maximum exposure?
Going back to Rogan's 'comedy' - He really needs to give up the ghost, it is absolutely dire.
Right so is getting Harris or not? How do you think JRE fans will react to Harris?
I have a feeling if she is on the show. It will be like the Brian Dunning of Skepid, episode. For only the second time ever. Joe will demand references and proof for everything that comes out of Harris mouth.
JR- You ever get high as balls and just make a manjina in the mirror?
KH - Well, as a woman I….
JR - (Interupting)Hey you can't just put that out there. Prove you are a woman? Show me some evidence.
KH - OK, here is my drivers licenece.
JR - Not good enough, it could be fake. Anyway drugs. Will you make them legal
KR - As a former AG for California. I….
JR - (Interupting) That is crazy, you cannot just say you were the AG for California. For starters you need a law degree. Are you telling me you have a law degree?
KR - Yes.
JR - I don't belive you. Show it to me right now if you have a law degree.
KR- Well ok Joe. My people thought this might come up. Here is my confiring degree and here are my transc…
JR (Interupting) I can't read this. Its in Latin or some sh1t. It could say anything. How do I even know this is a real degree. It could be latin for "I am a dumb jackass". Yo Jamie, load up Google Translate.
Didn't he have Graham "there is no archaeological proof for my claims" Hancock on recently? I'm sure his paradigm shifting claims were thoroughly challenged.
Trump going on later in the week.
Recorded on Friday probably be released same day.
Are the shows normally recorded and released. Or are they just done live?
The only time I have ever heard him push back on anything is when he had Brian Dunning on. Dunning has been involved with the skeptic community for almost twenty years. I find Dunning a bit bland personally. But if anyone is intrested it was episdoe 441.
I like his skeptoid youtube series, concise and to the point. As for Rogan, there shouldn't be any doubt he is a partisan hack with mush for brains and no bullsh!t filter. His interview with Tucker Carlson where describe treat Alex Jones as a prophet and his nut jobbery is the result of psy-ops he's uncovered is pretty pathetic.
Watched the trump episode this morning and it's just the same thing of asking Trump a question, he'll start to answer it, ramble off on some tangent then 2 minutes he might answer it. If you've seen one Trump interview, you've seen them all. Talked about same topics like 2016,2020,Russia,china, tarrifs, ufc etc
Dis Joe push him on anything or was it more of a puff piece podcast?
To a degree I suppose but mainly just trying to keep him on topic as he kept going off on tangents. It was just a conversation between the two of them rather than trying to hold Trump accountable for some of his actions
Joe’s just an ordinary man having a chat, it’s not as if the other fella is important or influential.
Ordinary Joe. Lol
A good coup for Trump to get on the podcast. I recall in the past Joe said he wouldn't have Trump on but that was probably when he was a bernie Sanders supporter. Haven't listened to Joe in a while myself as tired of his constant harping back to covid.
Rogan said that as soon as they tried to assassinate Trump he then wanted to get Trump on the podcast.
A snoozer of an interview though. Got 45 mins through it and packed it in.
It was tough to watch. One of joes strengths as an interviewer is letting his guests respond how they want without interrupting... But trump needed interrupting. The answer would go all all over the place.
I find joe has gotten worse in some interviews in directing the guest to what he wants to talk about. I listened to the Adam Sandler one a while ago and Sandler barely got to direct any of thr conversation.
Humanising Trump in any way after what he's done is worse than hounding him for hours imo.
The episode with Michael Shellenberger was very bad when they brought up legalisation around drugs, Rogan just went full steam ahead
It is funny though when the guest realise they have opened up a floodgate of nonsense opinions from Joe. Rogan really is a good advertisement for using drugs in moderation.
Or not at all.
Oh I dunno. The guy has 4 careers any one of which would allow him to quit 3 and still have a decent income. On top of that he trains fighting a lot - hunts a lot - does archery a lot - and still has time for his friends and family. And still finds time for occasional moderate drug use.
There are people with no drugs in their life who can't put the play station controller down and get off the couch. His drug use doesn't seem to negatively affect him in any way I can discern.
As for the Trump interview - like the Theo V podcast appearance, he really managed to humanize himself on it. But that tends to be what Rogan says he wants from every podcast he does. Not an "interview" or a "debate" usually but just to talk to the human behind it all and see if he can find anything that makes them tick.
Im not sure what this means. Like, you mean silencing anyone you don't agree with?
Rogan is of course loaded but I think his drug use as he gets older will have an effect on his cognitive abilities. He seems to be way more gullible too, he even surprised Tucker Carlson in their interview by saying he didn't believe the moon landing was real.
He had a similar thing with Matt Walsh. They were discussing how social media conditions you to pick up and support conspiracy theories. Rogan mentions Flat Earth and makes the point that way too many people would have to be involved to keep this under wraps and that, by now, there would be some credible sources blowing a whistle on it.
Walsh points out that the same is true of the Moon Landings……. nope! Rogan goes complete conspiracy loon and starts talking as if he was reading a speech from the Conspiracy Theories forum of Boards.ie
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/106011ca5625d81dfb148c9c1e2df535.svg)
