It seems like a Jewish right wing are determined to start a Middle East war and WWIII . Israel is the equivalent of a Fascist state and it’s time to call them out as such .
Well, you keep using words. I'm not sure you actually know what any of them mean.
PB
Just another day in Israel - stealing land. Nothing to see here!!
Doesn't change the fact that your parrotting antisemitism that was once de rigeuer for a certain party in the past.
And apparently, you're comfortable with it.
Life choices as they say.
What do you think is going to happen?
I'm not trying to stifle discussion at all.
I would just prefer that the discussion wasn't led by a bunch of conspiracy totin anti-Jew mopes.
You can have a discussion about immmigration centered on solid socio-economic arguements or you can let the lads in Coolock lead the way instead.
I think it's best to keep the racists out of these kind of arguements. Then you can concentrate on the actual issue.
Incredibly naive after what we have seen.
Give over, there's no good in either side of either conflict …all wrong'uns
but it's convenient for 'the left' to be anti-Israel with a hint of antisemitism in the mix, the convenience being they're kinda white to boot
Generally they like to call them self hating Jews. As if their opposition to the Zionist colonial project makes them less Jewish
Ridiculous
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-seizes-unrwa-headquarters-east-jerusalem?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=Social_Traffic&utm_content=ap_l8mosgqqof
Your comfort blanket of shouting 'anti-semitism' at anyone who dares to question the actions of Israel is gone. It is quite embarrassing that is all you have got to justify Israeli blood thirst
Lads, come on. A lot of you have been posting here long enough that you ought to know better.
I read a report last night that Hezbollah had indicated that they were open to ceasefire talks, but no longer tied such talks to a ceasefire in Gaza first.
That's a major shift. Can only, if true, indicate that they are under pressure somewhere, most likely on the ground.
Israel attacked UN peacekeepers today, and still most of the debate around here is about defining anti semitism. Distraction.
If colonisation upsets you, then the Palestinian backed, Saddam Hussain attempted, inpromptu colonisation of Kuwait must have drove you crackers.
'Blood thirst' is also demonstrably a well known anti-semitic trope employed by the National Socialists. And You!
Woeful attempts to stifle discussion. Try harder. Maybe use something of substance rather than accuse of anti-semitism when someone justifiably calls out war crimes, crimes against humanity and just outright savagery that the Israelis are engaged in.
Israel is living off it’s victim hood in WWII .
Others who the Nazi’s targeted are
Jews were not the only victims , but due to the US they are portrayed as that . Israel under BN has become exactly opposite to what it was supposed to be
They will be accused of being anti-semites by the cult
a lasting settlement….
Israel will only be happy when Gaza, and Lebanon are settled by Israelis
Absolutely. It's all down to the West Bank.
Unlike most here, I'm optimistic that there will be a lasting settlement after this war ends, probably based around some form of regotiatation of the former 'Oslo' agreement.
How do you explain the large numbers of Jewish people who are opposed to the terrorist state?
He certainly is
I don't think the US election has helped with the more recent rabid nonsense from the US
I honestly can't speak for anyone else on here. My views are clear - Israelis have the right to peace and security, as do the Palestinians. But neither "side" deserves to take that right by lethal (or any other) force.
I don't think phrases like "quite a few" and "many others" are accurate though. Some, yes. There will always be some. I've certainly called out people "gloating" over Hamas/Hezbollah but I will equally call out those who "gloat" over the IDF.
I don't think expressing inevitability for Oct 7 automatically paints a person as "justifying" Hamas. Some people perhaps, but not all.
anti semitic trope? is that what you’re hiding behind? the slaughter of 1000s of innocent people, by Israel and you think it’s antisemitism to call the slaughter out? Jew, Christian or Muslim, what Israel has done and is continuing to do is slaughter and barbarism
The USA are making fools of themselves over Israel. Biden in particular. Their moral authority is severely diminished.
More Israeli blood thirst
I don't give a flying duck if it is catholic, protestant, jewish, islamic, buddist or hindu colonisation - colonisation is barbaric irrespective of who carries it out
It is demonstrable that Israel is blood thirsty
Still has 'Jewish' in the definition, and still, therefore, no conflation necessary.
The 'Blood Libel' trope was particularly popular with the National Socialists. Friends of yours?
"What is now Israel" and what is now Israel? 1967 borders or including West Bank, because this is the crux of it
This thread is jam-packed with anti-semites, and you should be well aware of it as you post so much. They just insist that they are merely anti-Zionist, which of course you could be, but not in these cases.
Meebins is the only name I can remember because I interacted with him. There were a few other short lived posters, but I'm not going back searching for them. There is another I would DM you if I could, but I'd prefer not to draw him on me.
People who express that Oct 7th was inevitable are expressing that Hamas were justified. They weren't. It wasn't. Hamas had agency. They knew what they were doing.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/eaabbaf8a16773590ee22dd6c15f1d68.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c599644a213e5f18742e0afff85076a6.svg)