Breaking story, NY Times
**Threadbans**
briany
Susan678
We should just get more women as our politicians.
Short enough to be covered by the big manly secret service agents. 😝
Is that what he's doing? Hosing down a dead body?
No, but the blood, bits of brain etc, etc.
I imagine he is washing blood, brains, bone, lung and flesh fragments off the roof.
He looked to have been clipped by a rather large hand canon.
Hes washing away all the deep state evidence in full view of the public and hoping that no one will notice!
Have you abandoned the demolitions expert claim?
I didn't make any claim of demolitions expert.
over in the other Biden/Trump thread too - I’ve never seen such denial and such b1chy comments when someone simple points out, from reliable references that Trump is leading in some of the swing states - it’s as if you called their mother a huirs handbag 🤪
Also like Charles Guiteau who killed Garfield
Demolitions training rather...
“One of the females on the stage, she’s with me for three years. I know every thing about her. She would take a bullet for me, she would take a bullet for him, as courageous as they come. Same with everybody else who is around him — the head of his detail was on that stage,” Eric Trump said.
Trumps campaign manager also disavowed the narrative that somehow blame the agents at the podium - particularly and exclusively the women on the detail.
https://www.mediaite.com/tv/trump-campaigns-jason-miller-rejects-attacks-on-secret-service-agents-there-shouldnt-be-any-criticism/
Just a tad bit of difference there huh? Training vs Expert. So yes, a person needs training in demolitions to make bombs. Sure, the unabomber did it by himself. But he was particularly gifted in terms of his intellectual abilities and had the resources, time, dedication and motivation to self-train.
Now what about our shooter with no digital footprint?
You were asked before for to backup your claim that "a person needs training in demolitions to make bombs." No answer.
Again, you are just repeating it without foundation or standing.
So the claim is dubious.
There are ways to cover your digital footprint online.
The shooter may have learned from others. The information \ training may have been passed on in a general sense, without any knowledge of its purpose, by militia loons.
Also, you were asked earlier in the thread, what was the purpose of the explosives in the car? No answer.
They don't, the anarchists cookbook and plenty of other things can give you the instructions to build explosive. The Columbine shooters made multiple explosives, they were high school students. What explosives training did they have? Iirc, they used the anarchists cookbook.
the no social media seems like a glaring gap , where is the media glare when you need it?
They had a propane gas bottle with nails taped to it's outside, and propane torch directing it's flame toward it. That was it, no remote detonation device.
Doesn't really suggest a liberal activist does it?
Suggests more the paranoid right wing type.
my guess would be mental illness combined Trump=hitler pumped by the Dems
Have you been reading the thread?
'pumped by the Dems'
He was a conservative gun nut, a registered Republican.
And you had no response to the previous point about the lack of social media presence:
Doesn't really suggest a liberal activist does it? Suggests more the paranoid right wing type.
Come back to us when you have anything to support your 'guesses', because the evidence is pointing the other way.
That's laughable, the Anarchists Cookbook is from the 70's. A person isn't going to learn anything about remote detonation devices from that since it pre-dates mobile phones!
Or his VP pick who called him America's Hitler.
You've moved the goalposts now. Before it was that you couldn't make bombs without explosives training. While not remote, they had timed bombs. There's not a huge difference between that and a phone call acting as an initiator. They're both triggers that do the same thing. So no, somebody would not need explosives training or to be gifted. This is just something you've invented to push a particular conspiracy.
A registered Republican means nothing , if he was in a right wing bubble shooting Trump wouldnt make sense, are there hard core Nikki Haley types out there? I wouldnt have thought so.
A 20 year old with no social media but the skills to make an IED doesnt make sense either. Im happy to ask questions and make guesses until more definitive stuff comes out which it hasnt yet
Do you think electricity has changed substantially changed since the seventies? It's just a matter of a current acting as an initiator. So no, it's not laughable and it's more that you don't realize there's no huge complexity involved.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/cellphone-bombs-the-new-american-terror
i assume that a chortle har de har kind of comment, yeah good one!
today I learned remote detonators haven’t existed before mobile phones
Oh wait, the 1920s?
https://www.standingwellback.com/russian-ww2-radio-controlled-explosive-device/
He had no social media profile. Do you think a 20 year old engineering student would be able to find ways to hide what they are searching for, if they wanted to?
There's even far right heads talking about shooting Trump, as it would make him a martyr and 'guarantee' election victory. Evidence is earlier on the thread.
He was a conservative gun nut registered Republican. You picked out one part of the sentence and ignored the rest. You asked a question and there's your answer, how about not ignoring it next time?
The evidence does not point to him in the main being Democrat or mainstream media influenced, he stood out from his liberal classmates as a conservative. He is a gun nut. He used a weapon Biden wants to ban.
So trying to blame this on being 'pumped by the Dems' is barking up the wrong tree at this stage. The messaging is more likely to come from the right.
Numerous examples listed above where a fan has tried turned against their 'idol' because of some specific personal action.
Or messaging may have nothing to do with it, it maybe an apolitical \ personal grudge. His version of a school shooting.
Honestly, it's a mix of not understanding something and there having to be a deep state conspiracy.
And you still don't understand the points being made.
He donated money to ActBlue: a Democratic PAC. So yes, that makes him a Dem.
