Breaking story, NY Times
**Threadbans**
briany
Susan678
While the far right have come to dominate the conspiracy sphere, the fringe left aren't too far behind, so I'm not surprised. Great how reality gradually exposes them all over time.
within minutes of the shooting, a right wing congressman accused Joe Biden of sending orders to kill Trump.
but something something something it’s all the left, right? Cope.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/republican-mike-collins-accuses-biden-ordering-trump-shooting-1235059900/
That's very generous, but you do realise that tripods legs can be adjusted individually so to accommodate setting up on uneven surfaces right?
Hysterical?
Not sure how you can detect hysteria from a couple of lines of calm rational text.
I'm happy to leave it there though, not a fan of being gaslighted.
I’ve never dealt with a bipod so it’s not my area. Personally I think what she’s saying doesn’t make terribly good sense, but that’s just the most generous I can be with what she’s given to try and get a read on what her argument was. I think she’s going to catch hell.
Like this you mean ?
It appears the Secret Service were securing the inner part of the rally and the local SWAT or whoever had the outer parts, including the roof the shooter was on.
Communication was piss poor as were the actions of the SS who listened to Trump when he said "wait" and let him do his "Fight" thing
An incompetent sh1tshow all round.
yeah like the spotter on the right of frame but notice they don’t have a rifleman/sniper there on that perpendicular-to-slope
a photo shoot in the woods. Ooooh.
No armed marches in public then, no fist bumps with the lefty police?
They didn't say they had his DNA to check against… what they said was: we're trying to run his DNA
we're trying to run his DNA
So they might be lucky and get a match or get a match on a close relative.
Noted how you skipped over the part where they also mentioned photographs and biometrics.
Federal investigators said the gunman was not carrying identification, so they analyzed his DNA to provide a biometric confirmation of his identity.
How do you analyze DNA to compare/confirm biometrics for likely: fingerprints?
Still need a database to compare it against.
Slope of the roofs from where the shooter was to where the 2 sniper lads were just behind where Trump was.
I'm leaning toward ingrained incompetence, I'd imagine any previous rally probably was a similar debacle but they got away with it…probably an element of starving the Trump campaign of extra resources, just like RFK's campaign.
The head of the Secret Service is a DEI hire, her goal is to increase the amount of women in the Secret Service…not it seems to protect the people she is in charge of safeguarding….the same DEI programs that is destroying companies and institutions everywhere…
I had to laugh at something Megan Kelly said, she was describing the women who were putting Trump into his limo, "they are like a bunch of hungover sorority sisters"….The Secret Service needs to be gutted, just like all the other institutions DEI has destroyed.
The Democrat party is probably stocked full of similar types, so the next few months will be entertaining if nothing else!! Expect calamity after calamity, a lot like the last 4 years really!!
I'll get some links later for you. That OK?
Dan Bongino pointing out what an absolute disaster for the Secret Service this was.
Thats a summary / garbled version of what was actually said... which was:
Officials had said during that press conference that they were using the suspect's DNA to confirm his identity, because the suspect had not been carrying anything that would have identified him.
"It's a matter of doing biometric confirmations," Rojek said. "So, there was no identification on the individual, for example, so we're looking at photographs right now and we're trying to run his DNA and get biometric confirmation."
First reports said shooter carried no identification and had to be identified by his DNA. They also said he had never come to the attention of the authorities or police. How then was his DNA compared for identification? And so quickly!
you can have a suspect in mind and correlate their dna to a sample from a family member. The family has been cooperating with investigators since the shooting. We don’t really know how they came to suspect it was him or if someone who did know him came forward.
https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/police-are-using-newborn-genetic-screening
Site is down apparently...Wayback machine to the rescue
https://web.archive.org/web/20240716051840/https%3A//www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/police-are-using-newborn-genetic-screening
Thats not what was actually said as clarified in previous post...
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-rally-shooting-suspect-fbi-names-pennsylvania-man/story?id=111921870
No your pals in the democrat party didn't fantasize about taking out Trump...Cope
brother, you mean Trumps legal argument at the Supreme Court??
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4398223-trump-team-argues-assassination-of-rivals-is-covered-by-presidential-immunity/damp/?nxs-test=damp
Yeah go on and cope brother
Epic fail there.
It was an argument Trump's legal team seriously presented in court as a defence of Trump's acts, that a president could order the assassination of rivals and be immune. Not some random Tweet taken out of context.
This was Trump's legal team arguing on his behalf to the Supreme Court.
Former President Trump’s legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive’s broad immunity to criminal prosecution.
Will you disappear, deflect or surprise us and condemn their argument? Or will it be hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil of Trump as usual?
Obviously they were not referring to Trump .
They said "political violence".
Trump is no politician, he is a criminal, lying hate merchant.
I suspect that most Democrats would want to let the garbage live despite Trump being of less value than something One would "poop scoop" though.
Have you even read what you posted there? That was the proven rapist's legal argument.
Your tiktok Democrat boyo posted it with reference to Taking Trump out so yeah I stand by it!
my what?
Again, Trumps own legal team argued POTUS would be immune to do so.
Again doesn’t change that the right is making up conspiracy theories immediately after the shooting despite people coping online who claim only “the left” has entertained theories about the shooting.
Looks like the real victim is Tenacious D after jack black took offence at a comment made by Kyle Gass about the attempt during a concert. Yeah, stick it to the man Jack!
that scenario wasn't raised by trumps side
Trump supporters on January 6th... Trump thinks these are fine people.
