He'll be sat next to the woman he was cheating on which caused his whole court case!
And we all know how much Melania likes spending time with him of course.
Trump shares rocketing towards $50. That has to be wrong. They had dipped below $30 at some stage.
only a limited amount of shares to play with, and people grabbing them for a short. has to be that.
no one is really investing in this clown shop.
also, this exists:
To be fair - He did actually go to the school/college graduations of the others - It's been debunked that he didn't.
Having said that , him making all the noise about this is complete theatre , at absolutely no point did the Judge tell him he couldn't go.
The Judge has said from the off that if Court was on that day , he'd have to be in court as per the law but that court might not be on that day and that is what has come to pass.
thanks - i'll edit my post
Bedminster's Senior Golf Championsip is on, he is the current holder, 9 years running, course record has been lowered by him each year, will be first man ever to win any Championship 10 times in a row.
Barron and Melania are fully behind him to go for it (relieved) and Stormy has been booked to provide extra incentive.
They don't need one. The media and Republican PR team convince the voters that only the Republicans create the jobs, keep Americans safe yadda yadda regardless of who the candidate is.
Democrats are always fighting the uphill battle. They are the communists/socialists who come to take your freedoms and your money and now your jobs because they are flooding the country with illegals.
That's why even when the economy is booming like it was in 2000 voters instead of choosing the candidate who would continue the trend they did a full 180 and picked a guy like Bush Jr. Similarly in 2016 the obvious choice to continue Obamas economic drive was Hillary but they decided "nah let's give it to the guy who has no political experience with a highly controversial past.
It's the same thing with candidates. Obama was too young and inexperienced to lead while Hillary and Biden were too old. Next Democrat will be too short or too thin or some other rubbish. Whereas little is made of Trump complete lack of political experience or his age. The US voters gave Reagan a second term remember when the guy was clearly suffering from Alzheimers.
But then you aren't talking about swing voters, just the usual low info, follow-the-party-line voters.
Either they are swing voters or they aren't.
If they treat the parties differently in their expectations then they aren't swing voters, they are something else.
https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/1785351608282267857
Don Snoreone asleep again!!
He's clearly cogitating on his defence strategy.
There ya go folks.
Vote for trump, and this is what it gets you...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/apr/30/donald-trump-hush-money-trial-michael-cohen-latest-updates#top-of-blog
Like the pic of Donald coming back in after a break, he has either walked away from a big one or very relieved he got there just in time for the nappy change.
Compliance... For now
Time magazine today https://time.com/6972021/donald-trump-2024-election-interview/
deleted wrong thread
As has been pointed out a billion times already, the whole controversy is being driven by conservative Republicans to begin with.
NeverTrumpers or whatever you call them vs Trump and his people.
Dog voice
You do realise that that is literally what you tell a child?
"Fluffy has gone away to a new home in the country" etc.
Why are you infantilising people? A photo of a cute dog with big eyes...
This is the worst kind of manipulative hackery imo.
I didn't make the image, dude. I posted it after seeing it on another site just to make the point that Biden didn't take the dog out behind the White House and shoot it in the head.
The whole republican/MAGA contingent are saying what she did was wrong, and you aren't.
If that doesn't give you pause for thought....
It's a photo of Commander Biden, the First Dog.
It being "cute" and having "big eyes" is your editorialization. You're bringing that in. That's just a photo of the actual dog. If you think he's cute, that's on you. The image is not manipulated.
This is "the worst kind of hackery" however, couldn't find enough black americans to fit inside a photo frame in support of him so AI was used to generate this image:
https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/ai-is-so-powerful-it-is-tricking-voters-into-believing-donald-trump-loves-black-people/article_f76c2ec2-dbe8-11ee-85a6-1f30129c0a29.html
and see also
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68440150
Why are you defending this of all things?
Because they feel that someone has to? I dunno, it strikes me as contrarianism for the sake of contrarianism.
Photo of Trump going into court this morning
Some people need infantilising tbh.
Some folks are so incredibly detatched from reality that being too blunt with them could lead them to a complete meltdown.
'It being "cute" and having "big eyes" is your editorialization. You're bringing that in.'
Just look at the photo though. Whether it's the camera angle, the lens or the dog's expression at the moment of photographed - I'm not exactly sure what it is - the dog is 'big eyed'.
That and the fact the dog is 'speaking' and re-assuring people that he's been "sent to a good home"…
All of these things are meant to appeal to children - or Peter Pan adults who indulge child-like emotions in themselves.
Also if it is true that that particular dog bit multiple humans several times, it would not have been scandalous if Biden or one of his people had put it down.
No it wouldnt if it was properly done.
It'd be a scandal if Biden decided to to a DIY job and chuck it in a ditch after, before deciding that that nearby horse smelled bad and blowing its brains out aswell.
And you wonder why people need to be treated like children when incredibly basic details are utterly beyond them.
Good question.
Because I find the childishness around the way this is being discussed in the media provocative.
Even though people here on boards have made good points around the way it was handled, the lack of training etc., etc. the core of is that if you are an adult you understand that putting down a dangerous animal (that has deemed, rightly or wrongly, 'untrainable') is not a "murder".
For McCain, Filipowski and others saying that…do they even believe what they're saying or do they just see a big mass audience of overgrown infants who they can mold, pander to, and squeeze tears out of? I don't know which is worse honestly.
A person with dignity and self-respect should resist this kind of discourse, if you could even call such meme-ing 'discourse'.
It would have been put down following proper procedure.
This has been pointed out to you in multiple posts by different posters and you have run away from it.
So are you pitching your argument to those who follow political debate at the level of children and respond to child like glib insults as a substitute for following an argument? Seems like it.
Because anyone paying attention can see right through such tactics.
They are the resort of those defending the indefensible conduct if MAGA types such as Noem. Because they cannot be defended based on facts or evidence.
But if you take away the shock value - conservatives are shooting puppies now! - what has happened except that an animal was put down after it was getting dangerous? Which is unremarkable.
Then once a person realises that, it is just on debating surrounding details ('Why didn't Noem contact a reputable vet' etc.)
Adults can see its a pretty big detail.
Children might miss the significance.
