Donnie's gotten hold of a Sharpie again😳😉
**Stolen from reddit
Looka like Donny and the judge are on a collision course…
"I didn't say it, Jesse Waters said it."
Pure bully stuff.
Obviously if Trump is done in any of the cases against him, it will be because of bought judges and nests of liberals infesting the juries. Not because of overwhelming evidence which incriminates him or anything.
If challenged on it, he'll blame an underling and say it was one of them that posted it and not him.
And fundamentally , nothing will actually happen - The Judge will "admonish him" and everyone will say it's terrible , but absolutely nothing will happen to Trump - Nothing.
Although, Merchan has been quite the "none of your bullsh*t" judge.
It's the hope that kills you.
the prevailing legal opinions I have heard say that the request for a 1k fine per post is just the starting point, as it appropriate under the statute. However, it is just the starting point.
🎶it's a cult! It's a cult...🎶
You have at least one spelling mistake there
Another 'out' is it's referring to someone who is no longer either a juror or prospective juror. He keeps skating the line, eventually he'll cross it by accident, though.
I always love the mugshot one.
"Look at this guy! No surrender!"
(While surrendering himself to be charged)
while being majorly out raised by Biden, Trump funnels his campaign money where else but back into his own businesses:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/04/18/trump-campaign-funnels-money-to-his-businesses/73344744007/
This is why what happens with the SDNY Fraud case is so critical to Donnie's long term survival. He's likely hoping out of hope that he can delay until November and then hope that being president will yet again shield him from consequences.
But if the SDNY start to gut the Trump Org. for cash in the next couple of weeks, it'll likely sweep the financial legs off him. I don't know a lot about Donnie's current businesses, but if they at all reflect his previous attempts he's likely not making much money beyond the various MAGA grifts he's pulled.
Now, even after clearing out what little the GOP had in their account, he still hasn't got enough and is using this campaign money to keep his above water (or at least enough to create the impression of that). I suspect / really really hope that if the SDNY go ahead and gut the Trump Org., he won't be in any state to even maintain the fiction of being successful. We could end up seeing yet another Mike Lindell train-wreak, bereft of cash and doing whatever campagning he can from Mar-a-lago (while he still has it).
Who knows, maybe then Melania will jump ship? I somewhat suspect the extremely high "stylist" fees paid for her, might have amounted to a sort of "wage" in compensation of being married to Donnie. If he can't maintain that, she might just leave.
Its a New york case, not a Federal Case, so even as President he can't stop the case. Assuming of course that the rule of law in the USA is not totally overthrown by the MAGA mob.
One of the seated jurors has now been excused because after sleeping on it and talking with family, they were concerned they couldn't be fully impartial. Which is absolutely the right and fair thing to do.
Jury now back down to 6.
Yep, you really wouldn't want to be the person responsible for blowing the trial.
That's exactly it.
His entire "empire" runs on a knife edge of cash-flow and a bunch of his loan agreements require that he keep a certain amount of cash/equivalent assets available at all times or they will foreclose.
If he loses any of the NY cases and has to actually hand over a large chunk of cash , the entire thing comes crashing down as the domino effect of that loss of ready cash will wipe him out.
I'm amazed anyone is willing to be on that jury. Their names are 100% gonna leak.
Some of the media have been very careless already , giving far too much information about the jurors (like where they work etc.)
If the Jurors are being given anonymity then absolutely nothing about them should be allowed to be made public that could help someone track them down.
Stock's gone back up over 30 just now, now that is a surprise.
Zero logic to that whatsoever - Would love to know who is buying the stock.
Are there foreign actors buying the stock to "donate" to Trump??
No one is buying it because they think it will be a success (other than the MAGA's emptying their pension accounts for it).
That house ain't gonna re-mortgage itself:-)
I think it would be a good idea if it were 1K for the first post and each fine was double the previous fine for each subsequent post.
1K, 2K, 4K, 8K, 16K, 32K it starts to get into big numbers very soon and it's logically sound - if the previous fine wasn't enough to persuade him to obey court orders, it needs something more persuasive.
This sounds like meme stock doing it's think, it'll go all over the place.
that’s what the right is hoping on, with all the witness intimidation and conspiracy to jury tamper
It's something the Nazis would have done in the 1930s.
So, taking a step back, 30% or so of Americans would be very happy for a guy, who along with a section of his supporters, are known to intimidate juries and judges.
That's where we are at.
Seems like we've lost 2 of the previously selected jurors , so down to 5 seated for now.
The first juror to go expressed concerns about her identity being shared publicly, saying friends and family had already reached out to her asking about the trial after her description was published in news reports.Now, a second juror has been excused, this time after prosecutors said they found information that called into question the truthfulness of their answers during voir dire, the period where lawyers from both sides question potential jurors.
The first juror to go expressed concerns about her identity being shared publicly, saying friends and family had already reached out to her asking about the trial after her description was published in news reports.
Now, a second juror has been excused, this time after prosecutors said they found information that called into question the truthfulness of their answers during voir dire, the period where lawyers from both sides question potential jurors.
I'm sure they're not alone, but the CNN reporting on it is crazy, giving out details on potential jurors. Why not at least behind doors until the selections are made? Then it's just "Juror one, a man who looks to be mid-thirties."
Such a belligerent a hole. You can tell he's never suffered ramifications in his life!
