obi604 wrote: » Can anyone recommend a smart watch that is “always on” ? I like the look of smart watches but hate the fact that you have to “wake” them or even wrist flick to see the time. Budget: about 50 Euro
IrishHomer wrote: » I had that and I returned it for a full refund. After a few days I noticed it burned all the skin on my wrist. I never have sensitive skin. I left a bad review on Amazon
obi604 wrote: » Any thoughts on the Amazfit Bip S? Bit over budget but looks okhttps://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B085TX4QXV/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_eocJFbGRPKWX6
Cienciano wrote: » I did 20 minutes of research and found that one too. But the downside is that it looks absolutely poxy :pac:
Dravokivich wrote: » Sure that isn't just the silicon straps? They are very poor at dispersing sweat and come with all the watches. I always get different straps because of it.
Cienciano wrote: » A hybrid watch might be the way to go if you want battery life
obi604 wrote: » What does a hybrid mean exactly with watches?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Physical watch hands. Longer battery life. Far more limited in smart functions but pass as normal watches. This fossil for example that I mentioned above. You can change the complications or remove them. It's an e ink display and you can upload any grey scale sort of image for a background. The display is really easy to see in bright light because of the tech. Same as a Kindle.
beauf wrote: » Does that do notifications and vibration alerts?
Check out a Garmin Forerunner 45s.
Display always on.
Great watch, I happen to be selling one as it happens! 👍
1st dabs on being that person to go to Japan..
Garmins have great always on battery life. Mine (Epix) has been in always on mode since I bought it. Expensive though.