What are you talking about? Mad? Whataboutism?
Looking at the video in your link again, the clip is pretty shocking obviously. It's supposed to be.
The irony of the woman after saying that it was unclear what Trump was referring to. Yes, it's unclear when you remove the context. Here's the context before it: https://youtu.be/_7gJxku_BYM?t=1838
He's clearly referring to the auto industry and the second definition here: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bloodbath
As I said before, Trump says a lot of awful stuff so it's frustrating to see a whirlwind being fabricated.
Grab him by his properties!
Ah yes, it is everyone else's fault for listening to what Trump says and taking those words to mean what they say.
As usual. Everyone has to give Trump licence as he clearly can't be expected to actually say what he means.
Did he expand on this Auto makers bloodbath? What will happen if Biden continues in office to start this bloodbath and what is Trump going to do to avoid it?
Yes, the "bloodbath" referred to the auto industry....
In a speech which started off calling Jan 6 prisoners "hostages" and praising what they did.
“Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath for the whole — That’s going to be the least of it,” said Trump. “It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country.”
the whole country, not “the auto industry” and “that’s going to be the least of it”
I assumed he was saying two things at once.Using the auto industry to get in his threat to cause violence if he did not win the election.
I can't see how "bloodbath" would be appropriate language to use for when (he says) an industry is in trouble.
Did the miners (Scargill) threaten anything like a "bloodbath" scenario at the time even though that actually happened ?
He is just shoehorning violent language whenever he can because he thinks it works for him.
In his "speech" he did apply "bloodbath " to the industry and then clarified that he was talking about the "country" as well.
What do they about him? Believe it when he says it the first time.
I think he flies kites and if it works he goes with it and hardly ever retracts unless it is obviously not in his interest.
I see he has now "admitted" that Putin was "probably involved" in the death of Navalny.
I wonder why?
Of course we know that Putin murdered Navalny ,but Trump loves the uneducated,from his own boastful lips.
Fuller story here.
Bond underwriters being very clear, they don't want properties as collateral, it's cash or equivalents only.
If the actuaries at the underwriters don't trust a billionaire? Why should anyone else. I saw his gofundme has also died a death too.
Who can blame them? A case that revealed Trump's properties were already overvalued has made them toxic. What a fool.
So, if you can't post a bond, or pay or appeal - what then? Even in a civil case could someone can't or won't pay go to jail? In theory cos ain't happening with Trump of course.
Oh I fully agree, no trust whatsoever should be placed in any valuation proffered by Trump. The bond he is seeking is to cover a case that's seen him already convicted of fraud and financial misrepresentation over decades.
If he can't offer liquid assets as a guarantee nor find someone willing to assume the bond risk? Tough.
If he can't post the bond required for appeal, the plaintiff can seek immediate action including asset seizure. E Jean Carroll has won the case. If Trump wants to appeal? He's gotta pay to play. If he doesn't? Enforcement and seizure would follow.
She’s ready to help you auction off some property to make ends meet Donny
That auto Industry excuse is just ridiculous. He also spoke about the election being rigged. He's a dangerous lunatic.
I wasn’t aware the auto industry even held elections. /s
No one will under write the bond because they know he's not good for it. They also know that the net profits from selling his properties won't cover it either which is why they won't accept them as collateral.
Billionaire my arse...
NY should just seize everything and I mean everything, and fire sale the lot.
Likely won't cover the entire amount but as long as they take every single penny he has it won't really matter.
falling for the latest hoax, lol, its funny at this stage
Credit to u/Schoseff over on reddit
I'd say Jared has a few missed +966 area code calls this morning.
Indeed, it will say a lot if none of the family will bale him out.
Taking the monies quick so he does not have to return.
Maybe his FSB handler can give him a dig out?
Russia Russia Russia, 2024 edition
Speaking of other Trump criminals...
* Wrong link
Navaro is going to jail. SCOTUS declined to take the case.
It's not been a great day in Trump world has it. The NY hush money and election interference pre trial motions were resolved today, and not a lot for Don to be cheerful about.
Motion to preclude Cohen's testimony: DENIED
Motion to preclude The People from arguing Trump sought to improperly influence 2016 election: DENIED
Motion to preclude arguments on element of intent to defraud: DENIED
Motion to preclude evidence on 'catch and kill' scheme: DENIED
Motion to Preclude testimony from Dino Sajudin, Karen McDougal and Stephanie Clifford: DENIED (GRANTED preclusion of polygraph results from Stephanie Clifford aka. Stormy Daniels)
Motion to preclude Access Hollywood tape: DENIED
Motion to Preclude the People from arguing violations of FECA: DENIED
Motion to preclude 3rd party evidence of admissions of FECA violations: granted to extent and with caveats
Motion to preclude evidence of AMI's books and records: DENIED
Motion to preclude evidence and argument that Trump and his Trust is the "enterprise" (in the alleged crimes): DENIED
Motion to preclude notes by Allen Weisselberg: Reserved, The People must provide proper foundation
Motion to preclude Giuliani evidence: Moot, The People do not intend to reference it
Motion to preclude some 100 statements attributed to Trump: DENIED
Motion to require The People to disclose a "realistic exhibit list": the court throws shade in pointing out "Rather, the People suggest that whatever disorganization there may appear to be is of Defendant's own doing or due to Defendant's failure to properly navigate the evidence and the list. This Court accepts the People's representations and directs the People to continue, as they have done so, to update the Defendant on any changes..."
Navarro's plea to SCOTUS is denied in 1 page order by Roberts
In denying Navarro’s request on Monday, Roberts agreed with the appeals court finding that Navarro had given up the right at this stage to challenge the District Court’s conclusion that executive privilege was not invoked.
See ya tomorrow Peter!
You know what? I'm beginning to think this Donnie fellas mightn't be a Billionaire after all.
I can't imagine any asset seizure is going to happen fast. Of course, he might magically come up with enough to cover the bond by the deadline.
Mark Levin demands to know why Republican billionaires aren’t bailing out Trump (wouldn’t that be somewhat… socialist?)
Good video going over his options.
Mark Levin is a Jewish Zionist.
That takes precidence over ever other issue for him.
This is a key issue that is missing from all these discussions.
Trump is beholden to Israel just as much as Biden, but maybe he is not as reliable as Biden.
Conspiracy theory forum might be more welcoming to you..
