From:
Petrol stations with three or more fuel pumps have been told they must start displaying a sign showing the difference in their prices compared with the electric alternative within weeks.
*Blended rate of charging - 90% at home (night rate) and 10% public (fast charge)
Needless to say petrol stations without EV chargers are not happy.
I see the idea, but frankly it should be the seai doing a weekly press release and advert rather than waste retailers time with something almost all people will ignore.
Retailers have enough crap to do already without yet another "do it or we screw you" obligation.
So much wrong with this.....
I'm fully EV committed but I think this is an absolutely stupid idea, I see what they're trying to achieve but it's so variable and unrepresentative it's ridiculous. Even the attempt at putting C segment in there is a joke, nearly all EVs are SUV types.
I see some merit in comparing prices of purchasing different fuels in that particular station but I own 2 EVs where one uses at least 50% more electricity than another and I don't have night rate or even a home charger. I do have a work charger I don't personally pay for but that's a special case.
So I don't have access to those low night rates, and either do many others. Plus it increases the cost of cooking your dinner in the evening, or working from home.
And is it a physical poster or what is it? Do they change every time petrol, diesel and electricity changes price?
It's too heavily weighted towards best case EV costs
Another way to rub the noses in it of those motorists who can't afford to make the change yet. The SEAI should also consider compelling those who live in A rated homes to put up a placard to let everyone know how little it costs to heat compared to the rest of the housing stock!
Putting this stuff up while reducing grants is peak "It's not us, it's you".
Silly advertising.
It’s pointless and will never be accurate.
It could cost me €2 or €10 to travel 100km depending on where i charged.
The tin foil hat brigade will be on spouting about it now with at least one social media dealer.
nothing Wrong with reducing grants. Prices have fallen significantly.
Grants should be gone. Artificially inflating prices for the manufacturers. Remove them and make the manufacturers fight for better prices.
I think it's a great idea personally, it'll finally put to bed the idea that EVs are more expensive to run than petrol cars
For those fuel stations that aren't happy about displaying it, maybe they could pull the finger out and install some EV chargers
Worst idea ever. For a filling station that doesn't sell CNG, LPG and a 9:1 blend of night rate:fast charging electricity - it's literally none of their business.
SEAI should buy some advertising or be proactive some other way.
Yeah, fair point.
If they'd used SUVs then the fuel prices would have gone up as well. The important thing isn't the costs themselves so much as the ratio of the difference.
As long as they used the same basis of comparison between vehicles and fuel types then it's fair comparison
To flip it another way, there was a pretty notorious study years ago that showed EVs were more polluting than petrol cars. Turned out they compared a Model X to something like a Honda Jazz, assumed the electricity was generated using something like 100% coal and didn't take the lifecycle emissions of the petrol into account
The point being that a group with an agenda (funnily enough, the study was supported by the oil industry) can manipulate statistics to suit their needs
The comparison here is based on an EU standard for comparing fuel types. While it isn't perfect, it's a generally fair comparison
I can see where they're coming from and I like the idea, the amount of people that think their 55mpg diesel is just as cheap to run as night rate changing. 🤣
Wrong way to go about it though. Are they gonna change the sign every quarter?
Presumably, they'll also be mandating signs at charging points telling people how little (if anything) they're saving compared to fuelling a combustion vehicle
https://esb.ie/what-we-do/ecars/price-plans
64.7 cent per kWh for a fast charge. If we assume 16 kWh/100 km, that's over 10 euros which is more than their estimated cost for a diesel car.
I also look forward to sellers of EVs being fined for not advertising how much cheaper a petrol Dacia Sandero is and how much longer its range is.
To be fair, they've included 10% public charging in their pricing. Whether that's an accurate percentage or not is another argument.
If I was a filling station owner I would put a second sign up under the seai one in the same font and colour but showing the cost of driving 100kms after charging at a public charger.
Even if it is an accurate percentage, home charging rates are not available at public charging stations. Let's say you are the operator of the Texaco in Ballinalack, Co. Westmeath. I've picked this station as I know there is an Ecars fast charger on site. Why should you be mandated to advertise that it costs 3.18 euros to run an EV for 100 km when it would actually cost ~10 euros using the charger that is less than 50 metres from your pumps.
I get what you're saying and the fact that it's compulsory is very problematic imo. But purely on an informational basis, it's not wrong. Very few people charge their EVs solely on the public network. The small print that states that it's a mix should be a lot more prominent too.
In fairness the grants simply made prices stay high and gave motor dealers and distributors huge margins.
Grant came off and prices magically dropped.
From a business point of view it seems a bit strange to make an outlet advertise the benefits of something they don't sell.
And so have sales
Market share has fallen, sales are still up
What a load of nanny state shite! (Four time EV owner here).
That’s incorrect.
Advertise a cost of fuelling at a garage that you actually pay significantly more for at the same location. Makes no sense.
I like the idea of promoting the cost savings of electric but this is not the way.
I save €10/100km in my i3 compared to my old Insignia. That's a really stark stat.
Now I've had a few hours to digest this, had it been written into law?
What's to stop a petrol station refusing to do it or also putting up anti EV posters around the place?
I just can't see this happening or being workable
No mention of where the posters will have to be put, no mention of how often they need to be updated
Loads of easy ways out of this as far as I can tell now
Unless it's a comparison of forecourt cost for petrol or diesel versus forecourt prices for EV then it makes no sense. It's completely misleading for the consumer- akin to forcing restaurants to list on the menu the cost of the food if you bought it in a supermarket.
I do feel SEAI could use this to help force down the price of charging at public chargers if they used real life forecourt charging costs- if the poster showed clearly the real cost of forecourt charing per 100km versus the cost of forecourt petrol or diesel per 100km, it could have the potential result of forcing retailers to get more competitive with public charger rates.
SEAI are also in dream land using a 10% number to represent charging at public chargers- their own website states its already 20%, and we know that most early EV buyers are people who can install a home charger. They also do not include any charing losses which are typically 10% to 15%.
If EV sales are to increase in market share to the level SEAI want, public charging could potentially be needed for 30% to 50% of EV charging, and will have to be affordable. People need public charger for many reasons - travelling long distances beyond the range of their car, for the 30% of people renting houses where landlords might not want to entertain charger installation works, apartment dwellers and houses without private parking for whom installing a home charger is not possible etc. I think its clear also that the environmental impact of large battery ev's needs to be assessed- we have ended up with typical family cars weighing 2200kg wearing down roads and adding tyre pollution where small ev's with range big enough for daily driving coupled with competitive decent public charging is a better option.
If you have a tank at home you can get cheaper petrol or diesel but very few people have tanks so they rely on public fuel stations. There are so many different tariffs and discounts available for domestic electricity someone who is proactive with swapping providers every 12 months could be paying substantially less than someone who hasn't changed in 3 years, how does the chart cover that?
When I'm on the road I'd rather know how much a kW will cost me at station A vs station B. Or when there is 2 supplier's at a station how much I'm paying at each. Plugshare isn't always right and it's dangerous to be interacting with your phone or car map when driving to find out how much it'll cost you to charge.
Have EV charging stations advertise their price and speed instead of some BS formula that isn't relevant if you are using a public charger.
Based on SEAI own figures if you pay 54c/kWh or more Diesel is cheaper. So with the likes of Apple green branded chargers at 73c/kWh a full table would list their EV "fuel" as most expensive option for those with say a PHEV who could pick electric or non electric fuels.
If they insist on this table then EV "pumps" should have to display actual prices with a comparison table. c/L equivalent would be an easier metric to start comparisons.
Look like this is it.
https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2022/si/703/made/en/pdf
And there is reference to this in the SI.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32018R0732#:~:text=Commission%20Implementing%20Regulation%20(EU)%202018,(Text%20with%20EEA%20relevance.%20)
Follow link to seai website. It lists references to the law, poster size etc etc.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c4199a9ade0a2d2a249cb2444a358382.svg)
