How many more robo-posters, trying to "both sides" the thread into the ground, can we expect to be visited by between now and November 🙄
What was Habbas opening gambit of the defence?
"Alina Habba, one of Trump’s defense attorneys, asked the judge to throw the case out, arguing E. Jean Carroll failed to establish any causal link between her damages claim and Trump's statements.
Judge Lewis Kaplan cut Habba off, asking her whether the point of her request is that there is insufficient causation. She replied yes and was allowed to continue her argument for the record.
The judge denied the request."
How many times can they ask the same question and get the same answer??
Interestingly - The first witness for the defence is Carol Martin , who testified for E Jean Carroll in the original Sexual Assault case.
Doesn't look like her testimony has changed, so not sure what the angle is here.
dog and pony show for more fundraising emails and duping their very information-insulated base.
I pointed out on a subreddit, r/walkaway, that he wasn't even required to appear in court. The mods permabanned me for daring to poke the narrative that the judge was barring him from going to his mother in law's funeral, which is a complete fabrication on MAGA's part. They were farrrr more interested in fomenting rage against the judge.
Proud boys, stand back and stand by.
Sure.
Give us a few words about Trump's awfulness so. Something about being a rapist for starters?
It was a comment from Trump himself actually. You claim to be pro facts at least.
Which was received loud and clear
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/29/us/trump-proud-boys-biden.html
Are facts rabid anti-Trumpism now? Oh dear, the poo-diaper rapist's white knights these days.
Simple question - Do you think someone who attended a far right White Supremacist rally , even if only as an observer could reasonably be described as a "very fine person" ?
It's the equivocation and the refusal to actually outright condemn the whole thing that's the problem.
Trump has done it consistently - He tries to thread this line of not disparaging any group that support him regardless of how crazy/awful they are for fear of losing their votes.
Proud Boys are not supremacists. They have many mixed race members. Terrorists? Maybe, but the initial point was about Nazis, not terrorists. As usual, you're trying to make me defend a point I never made.
Peter Navarro sentenced to 4 months for not complying with the Jan 6th Committee subpoena.
Peter Navarro has been given 4 months in prison for his contempt of congress conviction..
Peter Navarro was sentenced Thursday to four months in jail for contempt of Congress after defying a subpoena related to the congressional investigation into the January 6, 2021, US Capitol attack.
Navarro was convicted on two counts of contempt of Congress in September for not complying with a subpoena from the House select committee that investigated the attack.
Each count carries a mandatory minimum sentence of one month in prison, but prosecutors had asked US District Judge Amit Mehta to sentence Navarro to six months for each count – running concurrently – and fine him $200,000.
I have no idea what you are responding to, ironically, as nothing in my post describes them as "supremacists" or "Nazis" or even "Terrorists"
Everything okay?? Try reading it again. But actually reading this time.
Can we put a sticky up to once and for all.
"Trump is a rapist.
Trump defamed, and continues to defame his victim.
Trump is a racist.
Trump is misogynistic.
Trump committed fraud.
Trump did not improve the economy.
Trump did not solve any "border crisis".
Trump ruined international relations."
Thanks
Oh..
And don't forget -
Everything Trump Touched Does
well i dont suffer nazis nazi apologists on this thread or anywhere
This is your guy? THIS GUY?
Haley mocking Trump for 2 mins straight to applause
What's odd is given how much time he spends outside playing golf, Trump could easily have a healthy and natural tanned complexion. Yet without the cake he looks so pale and sickly - so what gives? What are the side effects of syphilis? And why if he does wear the tan does he always apply it so crudely? The white house stylists must weep at his shítty application.
I have no idea what you're trying to say. I simply directly quoted Tiny sending instructions to a far-right group as proof of his Nazi flirtation. Are you denying he said it? Are you saying he didn't really mean it? Did crooked Joe mess with the prompler? I'm just guessing here as you haven't narrowed down your objection to my use of a direct quote.
Ah, the far right can't be racist they have a black friend defense
His colour looks like liver disease to me, or covering up the jaundice. Although he's teetotal right?
What a circus.
He is a rapist. Do you disagree?
"The media" is the new "they" for conspiracy theorists
If hes convicted of any felony his own party could try and stop him running for president.Then all hell could break loose in the US.Putin is loving this.
He doesn't need any party to run. It's not the UK or here. He can always run as an independent. Like H. Ross Perot did
Oh they won't stop him. They're too busy lining up to kiss the ring and pledge fealty.
It won't happen because instead, the GOP are busy trying to argue the Constitution doesn't explicitly say the President shouldn't commit crimes. All because they're running scared of the MAGA base (even though it's not necessarily the powerhouse it's thought to be). There's a cognitive slippery slope where they end up arguing for a king
So Trump just testified and nothing really came of it. Weird. I wonder why Kaplan was so soft on him?
Trump says he 'wanted to defend himself, his family, the presidency'
Donald Trump has sat down at the witness stand. His lawyer, Alina Habba, asks:
Do you stand by your testimony in the deposition?
Trumps responds: “100% yes.”
Habba asks if he has ever instructed anyone to hurt E Jean Carroll in his statements. He replied:
No – I just wanted to defend myself, my family and frankly the presidency.
Habba says she has no more questions.
Trump is then cross examined. Carroll’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, says:
Sitting here today, Mr Trump – are you aware there was another trial between you and Ms Carroll?
Trump says “yes”. Kaplan asks:
Is this the first trial between you and Ms Carroll you’ve attended?
He also replies: “yes.”
Kaplan says she has no further questions
Why didn't the lawyer ask him on the stand if he accepted the last judgment against him? We're they thrown that he actually was on the stand?
One suspects he believed Kaplan would go a lot further and let Trump the opportunity to rant. Kaplan didn't take the bait. Case already won.
Not a Trump supporter
If the GOP scupper the bipartisan border deal being negotiated, just to pander to Trump, we will really see them with no clothes.
