He died earlier from a heart attack, very curious guy whatever you think of him. If he didn’t kill Sophie Toscan du Plantier he certainly didn’t help himself by his attention seeking behaviour.
True, but not relevant to anything I said.
He was in Ireland when France sought his extradition (which Ireland rejected on the grounds of quality of evidence, not his nationality).
Britain or being British doesn't come into the equation at all, except for the fact that he couldn't return to Britain, because he risked another French extradition request from there if he did.
They come across as smug knobs.
Body language is nonsense.
Ian Bailey is obviously going to display signs of anxiety when being grilled by a journalist about a murder.
It doesn't prove anything.
Not sure, but I think better investigators would have squeezed a bit more evidence out of Bailey and the other witnesses than what was actually obtained.
Grilled him more concisely on his comments after the murder.
i mean thats it, nothing else
she was the problem, she basically ruined the investigation
There's a reason why body language analysis isn't admissible in court - because it's absolute, unadulterated hokum.
You may as well be linking to videos of astrologers pouring over his birth charts, or fortune tellers reading his tea leaves.
That for starters. A big chunk of the case methinks.
Bailey was British not Irish.
I don't care if you do or not. But its there.
Indeed, and that's why Ireland didn't extradite him to France.
100% no
again, no one has come up with anything specific the police did wrong in this case, perhaps other than listening to a bad actor witness
I asked a fairly specific question.
Do you honestly expect me to watch 90 minutes of quackery to ascertain if the answer is even in there?
Just so we are clear, no I won't be doing that.
you can have your own laws but other countries don't have abide by them
I would rather have them doing the detective work than the guys who actually did it.
my body language analysis of that clip is that they dont have a notion what they are talking about and thankfully aren't allowed anywhere near a court
💥 Analyzing Ian Bailey's RTÉ Interview: True Crime Body Language (youtube.com)
Many countries, France included, have a legal concept of Universal Jurisdiction or extraterritorial jurisdiction, where certain crimes committed either by or against their citizens abroad can be prosecuted in said county.
Ireland also has provisions for extraterritorial jurisdiction in certain cases: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterritorial_jurisdiction_in_Irish_law
Have you a link to where he said the phrase and specifically in what context?
Either am I and I wouldn’t be a fan of his lol
I'm not sure if that's a red flag at all tbh.
The red flag for me was when he said "I know I am innocent" instead of "I am innocent".
It's not logical that if you know that you are innocent that you are innocent.
Very weird turn of phrase. A better detective would have grilled him on that.
well as I said , the scum got the end he deserved.
you need to read a newspaper once in a while
it took place in ireland is the key, irish courts said no
if you look at the french court you would be wary of ever setting foot there
Why were the french looking to extradite Bailey? Sophie was a french citizen but her murder took place in Ireland.
Regards Thomas, she does appear to have given conflicting alibis for Bailey, first saying he was in bed all night, and then changing it to say he had left the house and returned in the morning.
For me his alibi is central to his role as a suspect. I don't believe there is a single witness to him doing what he said he did, writing an article for a Sunday paper.
He didn't help his own cause or the garda investigation with the conflicting alibis.
A rock solid alibi is the number one way you rule yourself out as a person of interest. He didn't have one, just one based on his own word, which is obviously not good enough.
it isn't evidence though, theres no evidence, other than hearsay and lies
It’s allowed when finding suspects. I don’t think there’s enough evidence to convict Bailey , but this is a message board.
its not victim blaming at all, just pointing out the reality of it and possibly the reason she didn't boot him out
if she thought he was a killer, would she have let him stay, come on
past criminal history is not allowed in evidence in the same way as statements of someones good character aren't allowed.
so no
Gardaí are pursuing a twin-track investigation into the unsolved murder.
Ms Toscan du Plantier was apparently confronted by an intruder at her holiday home in the early hours of December 23 and then chased across a field and down the laneway.
Her clothing is believed to have snagged on barbed wire, allowing her killer to catch up with her. She was then bludgeoned to death with a rock and a concrete block. Gardaí described the attack as frenzied.
I would also think it was possible that there may have been multiple attackers, not just one.
Motive is burglary or intruder?
Where that info come from
Link ?
If AGS received new evidence which would have incriminated bailey then they would probably have acted on it already. I'd assume that the new team still have nothing of worth (but hope I'm wrong).
