Just found the above chart backing up what I have been saying for years.
Global warming is a wholly natural event, if humanity disappeared tonight, global warming would still happen.
actually, tell us about your research about plants not absorbing CO2 anymore, first, and then we'll answer your question for you? deal?
No, waste of time with you. Not gonna bother anymore.
All evidence & processes have been provided so far. And can be found on fixed deserts.com
"I have done lots of research over the years,"
Really! Where have you published? Can you share some of the links?
Consuming content and forming opinions isn't research. Research involves investigation and discussion. Consuming content is no different than watching Youtube cat videos.
If you're good at research and you've lots of experience in it, surely you can find the answers to these questions somewhere other than an internet discussion forum. If you have a point to make, why not just make it instead of asking questions in a way that looks like you're trying to set a trap?
There is no evidence for a correlation between vulcanism and current warming. Volcanic eruptions happen all the time and many are simply not noted because they happen in unpopulated areas. There is no trend which accounts for current warming.
I have done lots of research over the years,
Based on Actual science, mainly related to population expansion from palaeolithic to neolithic.
I do have a question though,
How much carbon dioxide is being released by the volcanic eruption in Iceland?
How many eruptions have occurred during the current recorded period?
Savory method doesn't reverse desertification, and if you think it does please show us the proof.
Here's a clue - a promotional vid is not proof.
Iv provided all the evidence of what I’ve said.
You keep side stepping what else are we going to do to solve these problems.
Yee support the mainstream science, and ao does most of the world. And that’s mainly that there’s any animals.
If that science was working we wouldn’t have habitat destruction, desertification and global biodiversity loss on a global scale.
So reverting back to recommending videos by Savory and not providing any evidence... Round and round in circles we go.
We did and came to a different conclusion.
Hey all I’ll say is i suggest you start getting some second & third opinions on ecology & watch some of the Savory video’s and people practising no till farming, no dig gardening and regeneration of deserts.
Its actually extremely easy to measure. Initiate a program of management and then measure the soil carbon year by year. The experimental measurement can be performed by a first year graduate - so why has Savory never subjected any of his demonstration plots to this extremely simply test ?
Hahaha
I wont be answering any of your questions - since they are based on misinformation.
What is your source that says otherwise? Vaguely claiming that their measurements are inaccurate requires some proof too.
Yeah and iv seen evidence that suggests otherwise. I think carbon sequestration imo is extremely difficult to measure accurately because of sheer complexity & management.
And i haven’t seen any other realistic solution to the problems iv already named such as feeding a rising population & restoring biodiversity to the world’s lands.
You were also provided with an actual study that pointed out their carbon sequestration will not stop or reverse global warming....☺️
not the first time that’s been posted & when you see the word’s Environmental friendly Meat substitutes & assumptions then that’ll tell you all you need to know. Very heavily influenced by vegan & vegetarian belief’s.
You never answered back to any my questions earlier.
What options do we have to stop biodiversity loss on 60% of the planet
Desertification
Store carbon
Feed a growing population on diminishing resources.
More negative analysis of Savorys wild claims.
The problem with JAQ is that if you are honest they always lead to many more questions and seldom the gotcha moment you hoped for.
The problem is that those JAQ are never honest people.
'how come they are not absorbing CO2 like they should?'
was this an observation of yours?
It's trolling masquerading as a question. Otherwise known as "JAQing around" or "JAQing off."
Why don't you... I dunno... Do Some Research and publish it, lets start easily and say publish it here, and see if your observation is in fact anything beyond an uninformed opinion.
It wasn't so much a question as a simple observation,
If its a serious question, it's frighteningly ignorant. I think it's trolling though. Hence the historical film reference.
not sure what your question is - they do absorb CO2, but are not storing it long term unless they're creating wood, etc.; any CO2 absorbed to make leaves is re-emitted if those leaves decay again once they fall off the plant.
^^^
Has anybody noticed that plants are growing faster and flowering earlier and longer nowadays?
How come they are not absorbing CO2 like they should?
'world hunger? But I had a slap up meal last night!'
It was later than May, it snowed in England at the start of June.
the point is, 1976 was undoubtedly exceptional in many ways, but what we are seeing now is becoming normal and each year breaks new records in both average global temperatures and the frequency and severity of extreme weather events. Pointing to exceptions like 1976 is completely missing the point ( I suspect that is the point been made here).
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://www.boards.ie/applications/dashboard/design/images/banned.png)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wf.vanillicon.com/v2/f6ec3b6ae14cc6cd4a0e3a3374e0ef7b.svg)
