Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

Options
1717718720722723951

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 362 ✭✭RobbieV


    Realistically what would happen if the opportunity presented itself if he gathered up all of their stuff and threw it out on the front lawn and got the locks changed.

    What could they do? Nothing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,700 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    Thats what I would have done, but I later found out that its not that easy. In fact its even worse then i ever imagined it could be to get someone out who didnt want to leave.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,676 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I nearly take my chances especially if not in a city.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 362 ✭✭RobbieV


    As another poster said I'd take my chances. If they haven't paid rent in months then the judge isnt going to do anything for them.

    They themselves won't bring it to court either.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    It would seem from all of the reports in the RTB that this could go very badly for the landlord.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 362 ✭✭RobbieV


    Might not see court for 6 months or more. Unless they are planning to camp out on the footpath in the meantime and play homeless nothing will come of it.

    That's how I'd look at it anyway. It's them that's in the wrong. Not to forget this



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 362 ✭✭RobbieV


    Tell him to threaten them with court for the rent they owe too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    TBH having thought long and hard about it over the last year, I have noone to blame but myself.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    Guilty as charged. I was warned by many trusted people close to me to buy a house from as far back as 2012 I actually could have got a mortgage. Rent was cheap then and i was winning by renting. Its only since covid that the market has out run me and i cant catch up now that i want to buy. But back then I had no interest in buying a house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,276 ✭✭✭growleaves


    True. That seems to be deliberate.

    Institutional landlords can absorb a few bad tenants due to the scale of their operation. But they may have better screening processes for tenants also.

    However in the example given above by Vill05 of an LL who is highly leveraged but failed to lock down a lower interest rate within 3-4 years...any physical business like a barber or a restaurant is going to struggle if they don't own their own building. Any physical business that does own its own building is in a great position to succeed.

    This is not necessarily an institutional vs small question as such. A person with a mortgage is much more vulnerable than any entity/person who does not.

    Dudes who are over-leveraged and don't have the commitment to ride out periods of losses but demand to be in profit after debt payments to the bank. Is that a problem for the tax-payer?

    Corporate control of rental property will be bad though I agree.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Your ideas of the glory days ain't coming back lads

    Untitled Image


    Encouragement to illegally evict anyone from their home is terrible advice. Anyone who does it is likely to find themselves reinstating the tenants with hefty damages in tow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,132 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Not taking opportunities that were available is on your head, yes. The same is true for the mistakes that I've made regarding buying later than I should have. However, I heard similar things back in 2010 when I was using the economics board a lot. Many people would say things like "sure, we all went mad during the Celtic Tiger; we're all to blame." This has elements of truth to it, but it ignores a fundamental that is equally true; those who were given the power to govern fundamentally failed or abused their positions.

    To put it another way, I go away for a weekend and leave my house unlocked, it's on my head if the place is burgled. That, however, doesn't relieve the burglars of responsibility for the crime.

    Many people should have bought years ago, but they didn't for whatever reason. Now, many of them are priced out of owning a home, which will likely have enormous effects on their futures. Can one settle and raise a family with little security of accommodation? This also doesn't happen in a vacuum. Having people living with their parents in their 30s (and soon 40s) will be enormously deleterious to the future of Ireland herself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    So here is a question for you. Given that you were in a position to buy in 2012, but are finding it tough to do so 12 years later, what has happened in the intervening years to reduce your ability to buy the house? A series of demotions? Illness? Laziness?

    Because in a lot of your posts, you push back against the idea that any difficulties due to deficiencies in the market are to blame.

    Let's say you were 24 years old 12 year ago and you are struggling now at 36. Would you expect to be in a better position as a 36 year old today relative to a 24 year old today? If a 24 year old expressed the opinion today that it is more difficult for his cohort to get on the ladder compared to 12 years ago, would you dismiss him with "no it isn't, It's the same. Just give up the avocados"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 362 ✭✭RobbieV


    Tenants are not paying rent for some time.

    They have broken the rules of the agreement themselves .

    Maybe we need some more details from op as there might not even be a tenancy agreement in place. In that case they have no right



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,819 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If they're renting for 6 months they get part 4 and tenancy agreement is not strictly necessary



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 362 ✭✭RobbieV


    Could do with a few more details from the poster. They hadn't paid rent since last year. Hard to say that qualifies as "renting".

    If it was renting a room in the house the landlord also lives in part 4 rights do not apply.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭fartooreasonable


    To draw on your last point there a lot of the talk of home ownership is personal finance and personal issues but in reality this is a societal issue. This has and will continue to affect brain drain, foreign investment, fertility rates and much much more for a long time which will affect even homeowners in the future as they need healthcare, external services etc.

    Additionally I don't think a (in retrospect) poor financial decision made 10 or 15 years ago should prevent homeownership for anyone for life. The market could just as easily have went negative or stayed depressed like in many other countries that still haven't recovered from the 2007 financial crisis. Moreso many people never had a choice due to their age at the time to take part in the excesses of the Celtic tiger, I personally was starting university and remember being advised to consider a job on a site by my father instead and thankfully turning that advice down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 673 ✭✭✭Ozvaldo


    Renting in Dublin for the last 2 years cannot afford to buy a house here so Im looking at going back to Cork City



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,819 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Poster has given details before and has said it was a house share, the OP moved out but the couple in question remained and then stopped paying - they almost definitely have a part 4 tenancy, and are not licensees.

    The landlord has no recourse other than the lengthy RTB adjudication followed by taking it to court, and only then getting forcible eviction by a sheriff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    He also said the the owners solicitor told them that it could take years to get them out ........ so it's fairly safe to assume it's not a licensee scenario.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 362 ✭✭RobbieV


    Ok fair enough.

    How can it take years to get his house back if they have broken tenancy rules by not paying rent?

    It's grounds for a legal and legitimate eviction I would have thought. Or am I wrong.

    Also selling the house is legitimate reason to end the tenancy. They cannot stay?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,585 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Some interesting (if horrifying) figures for the new year. Not good news on the housing completions front from this government, things are only going to get worse for years to come apparently. It can only really be called gross incompetence at this stage, years into the housing crisis:

    "It will be “a number of years” before 40,000 new homes per annum can be delivered, according to Tánaiste Micheál Martin. [1]

    "Two separate pieces of research into required housing targets are currently being conducted by the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) and the Housing Commission. Both pieces of research are expected to recommend the state needs at least 50,000 new homes a year, significantly more than the 31,000 expected to be built this year."

    [1]https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2023/12/30/tanaiste-micheal-martin-says-it-will-be-number-of-years-before-40000-homes-per-year-built/

    [2]https://www.businesspost.ie/news/esri-we-need-to-build-50000-homes-per-year-to-meet-demand/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    Well strictly speaking we need more rental units, not necessarily more landlords. Not the same thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56 ✭✭Aguce


    I cannot find that video, but I saw one where mom owned house (US) with bad tenants that refused to leave. So son was made a tenant with official rent agreement and moved in. Bad renters soon after left and because tenants are protected so no one can complain about new tenant. I wonder if something like that would work in Ireland and @SharkMX friend could get bad tenants out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76,216 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    No, it absolutely and utterly would not work here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,700 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,676 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Yes I would expect where the house was rented by tge room that you could move new tenants in to replace tenants that had left. However you could not use it to change licence/normal tenant rules

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,676 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    If they had left it alone 10+ years ago there would be no need of tax breaks. 30 years ago most LL were paid in cash. Tge great and good on the left side of the political spectrum decided this needed to be regularised and regulated. They also wanted good corporate LL

    Since the RTB came into existence rents have only gone one way. REIT's are probably pushing rents harder and faster than any other entity.

    Long time private LL are exiting the industry. At first the assumption was it was tge accidental LL that were in negative equity. But it seems its also LL's with multiple units.

    Tax treatment of LL's is a significant issue and I do mean income-tax. Those involved as a service provider a have tge income treated as unearned and even though they pay PRSI it not counted towards dental or OAP qualification.

    Wear and tear is treated totally different to any other business sector and can easily be disallowed for tax treatment. The RTB is a disaster for LL. 3-4 changes would make a significant difference but there is political unwillingness to make those changes.

    Finally on exiting any other business sector there is significant capital reliefs, these are not available to sole traders in the rental sector

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Mike on

    Slava Ukrainii



Advertisement
Advertisement