Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

Options
17547557577597602009

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Yes, there's more than enough blame to go around but it's a totally fruitless exercise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,457 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Don't just accuse someone of not understanding or knowing history. Explain why they're wrong.

    Look at the population growth in the 30-s and 40's.


    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jewish-and-non-jewish-population-of-israel-palestine-1517-present


    between 47-48 they went from 32-81% of the population.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,457 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Nope. I never said anything like that. So please pause with your accusations.

    However, the Irish people have their own country, their own parliament, Palestinians don't. And the unionists aren't taking more and more of the republic.

    And finally, the Irish people never agreed to the plantations or to english rule. Just like the palestinians didn't. So you're comparing now, post good friday agreement with Israel/palestine in 1948. A more accurate comparison would be to compare israel/palestine in 48 with Ireland during the plantations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,457 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    The PLO agreed to a two state solution. The PA was supposed to be a stepping stone to it. Hamas, whilst refusing to recognise Israel have said they'd be happy to have a Palestinian state on the borders agreed to in the Oslo accords.

    Netanyhu is firmly against it and has refused to negotiate any further with either the Palestinian Authority or Hamas (Well, obviously not with Hamas) .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,045 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, good points. This is not an ongoing conflict between two neighbouring states who happen to not like each other. It's the story of an occupier (some would say oppressor) and an occupied region fighting for independence and statehood (a very different dynamic.....and this type of dynamic is often one of violence and bloodshed, as we know ourselves).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,457 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Israel was the victim of assassinations by jewish right wingers who were against the accords. That's why Rabin was assassinated.

    BTW, the second intifada occurred after Israel had backed out of negotiations. So that was before the vast majority of suicide bombs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    You can use the same source: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-arabs-in-palestine

    The population of Palestine in 1880 was around 300,000 to 350,000. The growth in the Arab population was largely driven by Zionism. That irony shouldn't be lost on anyone.

    Neither side can excuse their blood letting based on a unique ancestral claim to the land. It justifies neither the actions of Hamas or the ethnic cleansing of vast areas of the West Bank. Comparison to this country and our history just don't stack up, no matter how much either side, or the apologists for the child killer in the Provisional IRA, would like them to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    Netanyahu was always against the 2 State solution and the religious crazies keeping him in power think their god is against it too. It is disingenuous to suggest that it was only the Palestinians who opposed it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,457 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    And that's the thing. There were so many mistakes made when Israel was created. And we can't undo them.

    But the current situation is a Palestinian population living under a violent occupation. And the only way for Israel to get long term security is through a peace process but they're not engaging. They're actually hampering the chances by expanding settlement building.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    No it's not. That's very inaccurate. What should have been the Arab Palestinian country was invaded by Syria, Egypt and Jordan in 1948. Israel pushed them back and took a good chunk of it for themselves. The West Bank was retained then formally annexed by Jordan and Gaza was annexed by Egypt. There was no way Egypt and Jordan were going to give the Palestinian Arabs their own homeland either. They are a victim, a blood soaked pawn, of their Arab neighbours in their conflict with Israel.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭ Faith Steep Comic


    "the Irish people never agreed to the plantations or to english rule."

    We did agree to a British presence on the island when our government signed the GFA and it was subsequently passed via a referendum.

    "Just like the palestinians didn't."

    Time for the Palestinians to ditch the mindless jihadi inspired violence (and ideology) if they want a state of their own (just like Irish republicans had to do). It's brought them nothing but failure, and will continue to do so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,457 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    You do realise the Irish free state was created in the 20's, long before the GFA, and it was created through violence?

    And the Irish population, at the time of the plantations never agreed to it. And what the Irish agreed to in the GFA was to allow the population of the north to decide what country NI belongs in. That's self determination. That's not something that Palestinians have.

    BTW, Israel itself was formed by violence. It was jewish settlers who fought the British. Was that wrong too? I'm a pacifist but I'm just wondering if you believe the Irish war of independance was wrong and if the foundation of the jewish state was wrong.



  • Posts: 1,264 ✭✭✭ Faith Steep Comic


    So you think if the Palestinians persist with their current violent strategy, they'll eventually achieve statehood?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,680 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    "Israel itself was formed by violence."

    Define 'formed,' because Israel's one of the few modern countries formed by political decree. Every country has violent origins. Well, o.k., maybe not Vatican City (a Catholic country created by treaty if I remember right, so yeah, religions can have their own country.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,457 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    I honestly don't know. But negotiations haven't worked. The PLO gave up violence and negotiated and look what happened.

    Like I said before, I'm a pacifist. But I honestly don't know how long my ideals would last of I was a Palestinian living under occupation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,783 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    In pretty much every year in the 90's (before and after the accord) more Palestinians were killed by Israeli's than Israeli's killed by Palestinians. From 2000 to 2005 the death toll was approximately 3000 Palestinians, 1000 Israeli's.

    So, to suggest that Israel was simply victim in all this is patently untrue and is disingenuous to suggest that but for the Palestinians, there would be peace.

    I've asked this before. Do you think Nelson Mandela was a terrorist? Because he was branded as such and spent decades in jail. So say that you would have agreed that he was a terrorist, then is it fair to assume that you would have rathered that that what he was fighting against had prevailed so that a terrorist wouldn't have had victory?

    I've repeatedly said that Hamas' attacks were terrorism in practice but I can also see the reasons as to why Hamas exists.

    Trying to look at this with a right and wrong filter is not something anyone can be doing by accident at this point so we can assume that you are favour of the apartheid that Israel inflicts on Palestinians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,457 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    The reason the British handed it over to the UN was because of a jewish insurgency. Were you not aware of that? I'd assumed everyone posting here had known about the jewish insurgency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10 Set Adrift


    The period 1948 to the present is now and living memory. Are you trying to equate that with the Ulster Plantation of 1609?!

    I've condemned Hamas in all my posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I could well understood why history is being discussed but I think it a bit of a deflection of what is happening now. I'm more interested in what Israel is going to do with Gaza after this operation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,680 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Israel like every country has violent roots (Ireland and the USA jump to mind wrt to the British.)

    To say Israel was 'formed' in violence is pretty meaningless, basically it's just pejorative. Most countries were 'formed' in violence with few exceptions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,541 ✭✭✭Rosahane


    "The PLO gave up violence"?

    Like hell they did!

    They still pay pensions to the families of terrorists and suicide bombers including every recent one!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭Ulixes


    The Shinners gave up violence as well but like PLO they did so because it was politically expedient to do so, not because of a moral recalibration. They also hero worship child killers and terrorists. They are cut from the same cloth. I'm not sure if the PLO still run protection rackets and wash diesel though.

    If anyone thinks Ireland it anti Israeli now just wait until our very own (former) child killers are in power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,783 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    It is most definitely not meaningless when there are people involved in the situation are older than Israel itself. I mean, with that rational, any country could invade an other and immediately claim that it's settled because of historical precedence.

    Not to mention what has happened since Israel was formed and how it has taken more and more land to get to where we are today.

    If Israel is behaving appropriately in its behaviour, than there is no argument to denounce Putin for his actions on Ukraine. (A fact that several in power in the US and EU have failed to grasp)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    What is the cut-off date?

    We Irish are claiming land occupied by our ancestors 800 years ago and currently in the possession of the British. If the Israelis can't claim from 2000 years ago, how can we have constitutional provisions relating to 800 years ago?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,317 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I don't think the shinners will get in, their popularity has reached its peak. So you won't have to listen to our (former) child killers criticise your current child killers (Israeli army).



  • Site Banned Posts: 5,279 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Some of the women who were murdered by Hamas were also raped before they were murdered. Why did the UN Women group take until 1 December to condemn Hamas's crimes?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,680 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Sorry, did Ukraine invade Russia and slaughter its citizens?

    Must've missed that. When did it happen? /s

    Those older than Israel are pretty elderly at this point; sure, some might be politicians, they've seen plenty I'm sure. But I don't think they're actively making decisions guiding Israel's war on Hamas.

    And, I stand by my statement that most countries are formed in violence. No where did I use that as an excuse for those countries behaviours. Just pointing out its a meaningless point to make, since we're no longer in 1948 (or 1916 or 1776 or whatever.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,783 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Sorry, did Ukraine invade Russia and slaughter its citizens?

    Again with the BS that this conflict originated out of thin air on Oct 7th.

    image.png


    Israel killed on average 12 Palestinians for every Israeli killed each year for the last 3 years (including 2023 up to end Sept).

    If Hamas' attacks on Oct 7th are justification for Israel killing about 20K Palestinians since then, can you explain to us why with the death tolls the Palestinians have suffered above, they, whether in the form of Hamas or whatever, is not entitled to defend itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,680 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    How was Hamas' invasion on the 7th defending itself? How is Hamas' endless rocket barrage defending itself?

    If Hamas is justified in whatever they do as 'defense,' then so is Israel, correct?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,045 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    All of this talk about the massive threat Hamas supposedly poses to Israel and yet scarcely a single Israeli citizen has died or been harmed since the October 7th atrocities. How come we're not hearing about dozens or hundreds of Israeli deaths every day, with this monstrous and existential threat to their very existence on their borders?



Advertisement
Advertisement