A pit bull dog below in Wexford the latest episode of a child been savaged . Are these dogs suitable for pets .
PS The only people with Pitbulls or similar in our town are involved in drug dealing and or general criminality.
Threadbanned Posters:
xhomelezz
I will give you this. Your posts are throughly entertaining and enlightening.
Good to hear that.
If you so happy with what I say, I wouldn't mind a bit of contribution towards my new Volcom hat, always getting new one for Xmas. If you are interested to donate I'll PM you my gofundme page. New hat is about 35 bucks. For that little gift, you'll get the life time warranty my three girls won't bite your ass off. Think it's fair offer. It will cost me a lot of encouragement to push it through with them, cuz they can smell bùllshit for miles.
Anyway, happy to help 😁
No need for PM's, post you address here & I can see you next Tuesday with cash to assist. Sorry, busy tomorrow and Monday.
You really should teach your daughters not to bite. Responsible parenting is important too.
..
You really should teach your daughters not too bite. Responsible parenting is important too.
Unbelievable, but funny! Or unbelievably funny!
😁
Yet again the 'biting'..
It's not about the biting it's about the capacity to kill and seriously injure as clear from the stats.
Another dog attack but it sounds like a dog on dog one but the other one survived. Very scant on details and imo, made up.
Advice I received recently about a dog that bites and won’t let go - the only way to him to release is to put a lead around his neck and cut off his air.
Jaysis it’s slow enough news a dog attacking another dog. That’s a national newspaper hahah
That’s it , idiots think oh well jack russels bite too why don’t we ban them then is that the solution. No the solution is banning the beasts that can kill.
Big difference to being nipped by a small dog and a staffie, cain corso etc. or other crossbreed with powerful jaws biting down and refusing to release. Powerful dogs that can knock a child or other vulnerable person down and attack are the problem.
Just to use your rhetorics, only idiots think banning is a solution... I'm sick of reading this búllshit being posted here over and over.
I think some people are so iresponsible when it comes to dogs. The thing is, that at the end the dogs are the ones who pay for it. Not the clowns who actually are behind and responsible for dog attacks. Go figure huh.
I think you are a zealot with this topic .no convincing some people.
Whatever you think.. Using a word you clearly have no idea about doesn't help your ban argument either..
On the other hand, there's plenty of freely available evidence and data for you to read, if you can operate Google search, to show you bans do not work..
Man is fighting for his life in hospital after out of control 'XL bully' savagely attacks two people before being shot dead by police | Daily Mail Online
Another "family pet" needing to be shot dead by armed police after savaging two grown men.
I'm baffled that people on this thread still think this is an acceptable state of affairs. What a mentality.
Literally no one on this thread thinks that way. But it takes certain level of imagination to put it that way. Well done.
What a remarkable mentality shown in your post..posts
What about the level of imagination and remarkable mentality it takes to not connect this as a possibility with your snarling, foaming at the mouth XL bully or equivalent any more than you would a newborn baby.
Not so sure what are you on about?
Dangerous dog owners are notorious for having delusions that their own dog wouldn't hurt a fly.
Still don't know what your original post has to do with my post?
Not that this post of yours makes much more sense imo..
Do you know what a dog is? Does that make sense to you?
His post was totally fair. What's the problem?
He/she posted this
Personally I don't think his post was fair. As I said, I haven't seen any posts here suggesting dog attacks are acceptable. Maybe you did and can point them out?
Do you know what a dog is?
Nope, I have three big vicious rabbits...
To be clear, the issue is not that people think dog attacks are acceptable. The issue is that people don't want to do anything to prevent them.
But the net effect is the same, i.e. no reduction in likelihood of serious injury or death.
Exactly. The attitude is ‘you can’t tell me what to do. I know better than you. And I don’t want to hear anything else or anything that might change my mind’
Its selfish, immature people (or any age) who have problems with authority and rules and have no thought for anyone else in their community or that they might meet out and about.
I remember chatting to a guy with a staffie one day, years ago. Lovely, placid dog but it was still off lead in public place and wasn’t muzzled. Unprompted he brought up muzzles and said the anyone scared of his dog was ‘stupid’.
Where do you start with educating someone with that attitude?
And there is no education that you can do with low level dealers using these dogs as weapons. They will do anything to protect their income and we need harsh penalties for people using this animals like this.
The issue is that people don't want to do anything to prevent them.
That's not true..
That's not true. From what I've everyone on this thread wants to do something to prevent dog attacks. It's just some of us disagree with knee jerk reaction that is banning certain breeds. I think dog ownership and breeding should be regulated. There should licenses, registrations and laws that are actually enforced and breaking those laws should have harsh consequences on the owner.
Why is it questionable that "responsible owners don't get restricted breeds"? It appears self-evidently true to me. Ownership of a restricted breed isn't outlawed but it is restricted, in such situations, a responsible owner wouldn't get one.
Of course, the situation whereby the list is subsequently changed doesn't apply, as the dog wasn't a restricted breed when you got one.
There are plenty of other breeds that are not restricted so nobody is stopped from owning an unrestricted breed. Why anyone would want to own a dog so destructive that its breed is restricted is beyond me.
In theory, yes, and for the 99% of normal dog owners and normal dogs out there, this is more than enough.
Unfortunately, what we're talking about on this thread is a combination of reckless people and incredibly dangerous dogs. Saying that licences and registrations is the answer is just not realistic.
When you have a dog than can savage a grown man and withstand being stabbed and tasered without loosening its grip, eventually needing to be shot four times by police, and it's being led around without a muzzle by its owner, then you need more drastic steps to control both.
Man attacked by XL Bully screamed for 15 minutes until rescuer poured cold water over dog - Mirror Online
Consequences for the owner after the attack is not a preventative measure.
Well your view of responsible owner is different than my one.
Responsible owner takes a proper care of dog, or dogs, no matter the breed, size, weight. Not so sure how some list can play a role in it.
Still remember your small dog small garden equals to happy dog perfect logic 😉, so I'm kind of a sceptical, when it comes to your post.
There are plenty of other breeds that are not restricted so nobody is stopped from owning an unrestricted breed.
And that's the problem, any clown can own the dog.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/v2/bc72f221de9dfb5cc318c7fbf7264382.svg)
