Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

Options
15805815835855862009

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Who in their right mind would shelter in a Hamas built bomb shelter?

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Doctors without Borders nurse from the US recounts what she saw in Gaza. She evacuated last Wednesday

    "Me being safe is the result of having to leave people behind."

    "...Children with massive burns down their faces, down their necks, all over their limbs because the hospitals are so overwhelmed they are being discharged immediately after and being discharged to these camps with no access to running water, there's 50,000 people at that camp now, and 4 toilets. They're given 2 hours of water every 12 hours."

    "fresh open burns and wounds, fresh amputations just walking around"

    As it got worse the survivors even turned on the healthcare workers and because accusing them of being Israeli spies etc. for letting these atrocities continue. They "would have died in a week" without help from Palestinians in Doctors Without Borders. "only ate 700 calories a day" for 50 people each. No cell service. "The National staff (palestinian doctors)" didn't leave our side... "incredible men who have sacrificed everything for us -- time with their family, their own physical safety, their own water supply -- watching them fight to get us across the border knowing they were not coming with us -- they didn't waver -- [then we found out Abraham's] parents were dead, -- they were losing family members and friends"; "When I say we would have starved to death without them, I am not exaggerating." They also kept desperate civilians from othering them as conditions continued to deteriorate "with love and kindness, no violence in their heart -- they calmed everyone else down around them."

    Anderson Cooper: Would you go back to Gaza?

    "In a heartbeat. In an absolute hearbeat. My heart is in Gaza it will stay in Gaza."

    "The Palestinian people that I worked with -- were some of the most incredible people in my life." "We lost a nurse weekend one, he was killed when the ambulance outside the hospital was blown up."

    "I would like to send out a reminder that there are civilians seeking shelter there, and that my doctors and nurses didn't leave out of loyalty to their community; and, I know there is an idea being pushed right now that anyone staying behind right now is going to be considered some kind of a threat, and I want to remind people that the people that stayed behind are heroes. The people that stayed behind -- they know they're going to die, and they're choosing to stay behind anyway" "If I can ever have an ounce of heart they [they] have, I will die a happy person."

    "I wake up every morning and I send out a text message [to the hospital staff], and I ask are you alive?, and every night before I go to sleep I send another message that says are you alive?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 838 ✭✭✭Sir_Name




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    Just like how the Troubles in Northern Ireland were entirely due to anti Protestantism.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    It's not the main focus of their argument so I don't see it being both ways. The focus of their argument is to color Israel a state of victimhood that just has no choice but to bomb its neighbors children because 'being nice' isn't an option.

    I just don't see how it's interesting here to re-litigate the 48 war, or engage in interrogatives about the 48 war like it was a sporting match. It's neither the origin or root of the 'issues' as argued, those go even farther back for modern history (red line agreement), and even farther back and biblical beyond that: Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.

    So as to why I don't bring up in my arguments the 48 war, the 67 war, etc. etc. etc. wars, most people involved, especially the victims, weren't alive then, they have no role in what happened. It's not like Israel is run by the same people, heck Palestine isn't either. I find it more interesting to talk about a more modern inflection point (there have been a couple but) where the Oslo Accords were going well ie. Land for Peace, and then -- political assassination with Bibi's hands all over it, Bibi despised the idea of land for peace, regime change in Israel, and the emergence of the a new status quo for conflict. Decades of illegal settlements, house by house, family by family evictions, these are not things that can simply be swept under this great big rhetorical rug of 'because antisemitism'; the Oslo Accords were the beginning of the end of war and then, new war started under new management. People who plainly benefitted from the status quo.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu floated a plan for Israel to be responsible for Gaza’s overall security for an “indefinite period” after the war in an interview with ABC News. Israel has vowed to destroy Hamas, which has ruled Gaza since 2007, but had not offered a vision of who would administer the enclave after the war. Israeli forces advanced deeper into the territory, closing in on Gaza City — a move that U.S. officials said would probably lead to increased casualties. In a phone call with Netanyahu, President Biden discussed “tactical pauses” that would allow civilians to flee areas of fighting and ensure safe access for aid, according to the White House.

    Unless someone tells him differently he will annex the north of the Gaza strip.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/11/07/israel-war-news-hamas-gaza-palestine/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 838 ✭✭✭Sir_Name




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭keynes


    They know full well they can never "destroy Hamas"; if anything, their offensive is a recruitment campaign for Hamas. The entire "going into Gaza" thing is merely a pretext for another land grab and the forced displacement of Gazans (ideally to some other country).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,134 ✭✭✭crusd


    Yes, murdering 10,000 people and cutting of aid is a perfectly reasonable and proportionate reaction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Arabs rejected it all. And then the Arab states ganged up on Israel and lost.

    Similar border changes and decisions were made in post-WW2 in Europe. Anyone went on rejecting the changes, ganging up on neighbouring country, invading them, hating the other party for decades, and waging terrorism culminating in a extermination death cult 80 years later?

    No, everyone accepted the new borders. The prime example being Germany, which had millions people expelled from Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary and elsewhere, and went on becoming a highly successful democratic country.

    It's akin the Germans driven out of the borderlands of Czechoslovakia after the WW2 (where they lived for up to 800 years) would reject the plan, asked Austria and Germany to invade Czechoslovakia, which would fail, and then waged terrorist warfare against Czechoslovakia ever since.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭McGiver


    That is decided by Israel not by Ireland protected by the NATO umbrella for free with no army to speak of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭McGiver




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    "Might makes right?"

    Israel decides how many it kills, yes, not how many are proportional.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42 weary1


    So you maybe think Hamas are not capable of building bomb shelters, yet they can build extensive tunnels



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    What bomb shelter is immune to being destroyed by the IDF?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Did she ask the lovely people if they support the two-state solution too?

    Because only <30% do. Majority supports "from the river to the sea" i.e. a genocidal islamist project. Also marked as "Others" in the survey results below.

    image.png




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭McGiver




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42 weary1


    Shelters that are not built by Hamas, according to the post I responded to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Niccolò Machiavelli :

    "To ally with great powers to defeat your neighbour is a strategic trap; if you win, you become the slave of the greater power; if the allied power is defeated, you remain alone and defenceless against the angry neighbour, and you are destroyed." - Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,414 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,134 ✭✭✭crusd


    Any solution will be complex. Simply thinking force will do anything other than a short term reduction in rockets is naive.

    What needs to be done is pull the rug out from under Hamas by giving a victory to Fatah in the West Bank. A UN mandate and UN troops on the ground in the West Bank. Massive investment in the West Bank. Both to improve the lives of Palestinians living there and incentivise settles to leave. Because leave they must. Working towards an independent Palestine based in the West Bank. Jerusalem to be designated a “free city” under UN mandate. Opportunities to improve their lives will see a move away from the extreme. It might be slow at first but will happen. All the time Gaza’s will see the improving lives of their kin in the west bank and start to hope for similar. In the short term an increase in security on the Israel / Gaza border is needed. Perhaps a UN buffer zone. Won’t stop rockets but will prevent oct 7th style attacks. Then go after the finances of Hamas in a major war. If this needs sanctions on Iran and Qatar so be it. Put the squeeze on them and send in UN troops to distribute aid. Target specific Hamas strongholds also, but prioritising the safety of civilians, all civilians. Would be a long hard path but the Hamas support would erode and eventually allow a more rational faction to emerge in Gaza leading to a United Palestinian state, alongside Israel with Jerusalem under international mandate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Since the IDF won't differentiate between a civilian bomb shelter and a hamas tunnel what would be the utility in doing so?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,182 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    No..

    What I am saying is, Hamas built shelters would be specific targets for the IDF. The IDF have bombed UN bomb shelters for which they are given coordinates to prevent the IDF bombing them.

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Clutching at straws ad absurdum....And IDF would surely bomb the shelters because they are vampires.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Augme



    No, my point is Israel is full of ****. They'll never attack Qatar or eliminate the Hamas leadership. They'll just continue to primarily kill Palestinian women and children.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,134 ✭✭✭crusd


    There were sizeable Jewish populations all over the region prior to the emergence of the state of Israel. Anti-semitism in the Arab world was not the major issue it was in Europe. Zionism and anti semitism in the region emerged on parallel. All the Ottomans cared about was if the population were loyal and paid taxes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 929 ✭✭✭nolivesmatter


    What the **** does a proportionate response even mean? Is it the same number killed? The same number of rockets fired? Or given that the attack on Israel was an escalation in the numbers being killed in a single attack, maybe a proportionate response would be an equal escalation. It really is all a load of bollocks to use proportions to determine whos right and wrong here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    shouting ad absurdum, and then engaging in ad absurdum. 😂

    It is a fact that the IDF has bombed refugee camps. How is it absurd to point out this fact? The IDF have proven they will revoke quarter to any refugee site. It doesn't matter if it's rated as a bomb shelter or not.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Who is going to put sanctions on Iran and Qatar exactly ?

    Niccolò Machiavelli :

    "To ally with great powers to defeat your neighbour is a strategic trap; if you win, you become the slave of the greater power; if the allied power is defeated, you remain alone and defenceless against the angry neighbour, and you are destroyed." - Niccolò Machiavelli



Advertisement
Advertisement