Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

Options
14894904924944952009

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Beyond the pale? Both antagonists? Are you equating Israel military operation to Hamas thugs terrorist attacks which murdered, raped, brutalised and kidnapped unarmed men, women and children, including Palestinians?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 962 ✭✭✭Burty330


    If Hamas leadership hiding out in refugee Camps doesn't convince you there are a apocalyptic death cult then nothing will.. Support within gaza for a group on par with isis should have been 0%.. I heard someone say it was only 44% what's the big deal.

    44% support , plus the full force of hamas means total subjugation the other 56%. Hindsight is 20/20 but there should have been more efforts from the outside and within to tackle the increasing control hamas was taking over Gaza. Allowing them to build influence was always going to lead to the to current situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,762 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    They certainly excuse civilians casualties as a collateral damage in the way other armies do. We sometimes hear the Russians say we dont target civilians or we were going after a military target when they kill civilians. That is very much excusing their actions

    Also using a bunker bomb in a refugee camp is not minimising civilians casualties. They knew civilians would die but calculated it was worth it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,378 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    I think its time to change the title of this thread now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Minimizing civilian loss still means that one accepts the reality of war and that they will occur.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,002 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Oh they are occuring alright. Bombing refugee camps will never be minimising civilian casualties no matter what way you spin it.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,762 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    As mc Giver admitted a few posts up this war won't go long on that long. Biden has likely given Bibi a window. So Israel even if it could achieve its objectives- which isn't likely to - Biden won't give Bibi that long. Its going to end up in a ceasefire. Hamas maybe weakened but Gallant's objective of it being destroyed I very much doubt it- especially given the political leadership will still be in tact in Qatar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭McGiver


    This is what the IDF are up against. Of course, just like their Russian friends (Hamas is Russian ally) Hamas is using unmarked military personnel which is against the Geneva Conventions with no lapsing clauses or exceptions.

    So will the Israel critics on this thread declare war crimes and condemnation? Looking forward to seeing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,762 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Do you know who Mahomud al Zahar is? What is unusual about him Mc Giver?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,142 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Begin a peace process, negotiate, talk, treat all terrorists as criminals and pursue them to the full powers of the law

    Bombing civilians is the worst thing Israel can do if they have any intention of ever making peace

    Ban billionaires



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    800 metres to the coast for the Israeli forces south of Gaza city , mostly fields.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Spot on. Just that it's not a death cult. That's only a rhetoric and a tool. They're gangsters, Hamas has a structure and all traits of an organised crime group. The freedom fighting, Al Aqsa, islamism, death cult etc are all theatre to fool the poor Gazans, while the Hamas leaders get you steal humanitarian aid (we give to Gaza), get rich, live in luxury and party in Dubai. It's about money and power, which leads to money. That's why Iran are OK to support them because they aren't a serious Sunni group that would compete with their Shia Islam.

    They're gangsters but very dangerous gangsters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Well if that happens it just ensure that the next time this happens Israeli restraint will go out the window.


    A ceasefire now means Hamas survives, that means the existential risk endures, that will necessitate a large fenced exclusion zone in from the border and a fence across the middle of it, with what was Northern Gaza becoming an Israeli army administered range.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Hopefully the Hamas fighters will not just tear up the court summons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,762 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    This is what a Russian apologist would say, but you wouldn't accept it from them. Using a bunker buster bomb in a densely populated refugee camp is not miminmising casualties no matter how you try to spin in. We should really be grateful a mini nuke wasn't deployed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    If there was a very senior target and command compound there then Israel had an obligation to take it out.


    It's tough on the people who were above, no doubt about that. By taking out such a target it weakens Hamas all the way down and that saves lives in the long run.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,669 ✭✭✭brickster69


    The first action was when Israel started it's illegal occupation of Palestinians territory. You are either on the offence or the defence, you can't be both.

    Niccolò Machiavelli :

    "To ally with great powers to defeat your neighbour is a strategic trap; if you win, you become the slave of the greater power; if the allied power is defeated, you remain alone and defenceless against the angry neighbour, and you are destroyed." - Niccolò Machiavelli



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,895 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    But if a mini nuke was deployed, then that's ok, it wasn't a large nuke. That's classed as restraint in some people eyes.

    I can remember outrage when the like of the US would use a drone to bomb a terrorists house and kill a few innocent civilians along with the target. We're now on to bombing refugee camps and people bending over backwards to defend it or justify it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,002 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    You're not really getting the debate, are you? Does this video of Hamas terrorists attacking IDF excuse bombing civilians and killing 420 children per day? I didn't see any civilians in the video. By all means, kill those terrorists in their tunnel.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Bar the 700,000 Ukrainian children who have been disappeared by Russian force's into Russia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,762 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    If Israel was showing restraint why is even their staunchest supporter calling for them to do everything possible to not kill civilians

    Hamas is going to survive. They maybe weakened, but they will survive. Your right wing principles won't allow you to accept that you can't defeat an ideology militarily long term

    As I explained to you before there is no existential threat to Israel from Hamas. To suggest so is deeply misguided. Israel is one of the most powerful armies in the world backed up by America. They cannot be defeated militarily. If they could this would be a wider war already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,181 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Says it all that all the people shouting murder / genocide / stop bombing children / stop bombing hospitals / stop bombing refugee canps never have any answer to that. Do they think anyone here is happy that there are civliian deaths, many children? It's awful, brutal.

    But what other realistic way is there to remove Hamas?

    Or should Israel just cease fire, retreat, and let new waves after waves of October 7th attacks come onto them and exterminate them? That is what Hamas announced yesterday that it will do

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,995 ✭✭✭McGiver


    The principle of proportionality when taking out HVT (high value target) in practise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,762 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Would you accept this rationale if the situation was reversed, say scores of Israeli civilians were killed in a conventional war with one of its neighbours ,during what was deemed a self defensive measure, that from the enemies perspective they felt was necessary to save lives in the long run by weakening the military capability of the IDF to prosecute a war ?

    I think in both scenarios the obligation is to minimise civilian casualties which the IDF didn't by using a bunker buster bomb in a refugee camp. Do these commanders live 24/7 in bunkers outside of war time by the way? There are other ways to get at them if you truly want to minimise civilian casualties.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,055 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    An absolute war crime of course. International law states you cannot move children anywhere without the permission of their parents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Again, that is a moral rather than a legal position. From an international law perspective, a truce and peace were in place on 6th October. Hamas broke that with their terrorist war crime actions on 7/10.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    If Hamas could take out an Israeli chief of staff and that meant blowing up a residential block with him, I wouldn't see the difference and the rationale would still stand.


    Presumably the higher up Hamas leaders live most of their lives in the bunkers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    There are other ways to destroy deep tunnels other than bunker busting bombs?? Maybe you would explain this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    People need to drop the idea of trying to compare Ukrainian to Gaza losses considering that large parts of Ukraine are still currently under illegal occupation so there is no reliable figures for casualties, only the other day a Family of 9 was massacred by a Russian soldier in donesk



Advertisement
Advertisement