Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

Options
19399409429449451866

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,620 ✭✭✭✭phog




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭ScissorPaperRock


    Excellent news.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,507 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    ROG praising Aki for dealing with the ref... Not sure what expression best covers that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,209 ✭✭✭Mr Tickle


    Probably no harm keeping Aki in place, assuming his form stays up, to help settle in the new 10s. For this season anyway. After that assess again based on whether his performance outweighs the benefits of developing new partnerships.


    EDIT: Accidentally quoted someone rather than just adding a new post



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,670 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Brilliant for Ireland and Connacht. I was amazed by the number of posters wanting to get rid of him after the World Cup.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,491 ✭✭✭✭bilston




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Absolutely ridiculous that a 33 year old who'll be 37 at the next World Cup is getting a 2 year extension at the start of a World Cup cycle. We need to be ruthless.

    Brilliant player, fantastic servant to Irish rugby, but time to move on the old guard. No other serious rugby nation would be doing this.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,555 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    hes not been given the extension to get him to the next RWC (obviously) so any mention of that as a reason NOT to give him an extension is a complete waste of breath.

    He has just put in his best season so far, and (again obviously) the finances are working to keep him staying on, so it is overwhelmingly positive that he is.

    New Zealand are showing that (again, obviously) you do not need 4 years to plan for a RWC. South Africa in 2019 planned from 16 months out. it can be argued that NZ this year have planned from less than 12 months out.

    Rugby does not stop for 3 years between every RWC competition so making decisions now on what may happen in 4 years is not good business sense.

    But hey, way to go for trying to turn a (very obvious) positive story into a miserable one. You do you boo.

    Post edited by sydthebeat on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TRC10


    hes not been given the extension to get him to the next RWC (obviously) so any mention of that as a reason NOT to give him an extension is a complete waste of breath.

    It's 2 years of development for other centres thrown away. It shows once again that the IRFU's priority is to try to squeeze out every possible win at the expense of building towards a World Cup. It's such a small time mentality.

    SA and NZ have lost plenty of matches over the last few years, while Ireland have been on an unbelievable winning run (think we only lost 2 games since February 2021). Yet, SA and NZ are in a World Cup final. I know who's position I'd rather be in.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,555 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    It's 2 years of development for other centres thrown away.

    prove it?

    your argument is based on this simple opinion... so.. prove it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TRC10


    The proof is that he's just been given a 2 year central contract, which means he's going to be starting basically every game, except maybe one test a year against a tier 2 nation.

    That's at least twenty games that could be going to say Frawley, Osborne or Forde, who will actually be available at the next World Cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,402 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Andy Farrell has repeatedly demonstrated that if he thinks a player is good enough to break into the Ireland squad then he'll select him. Happened with Doris, Kelleher, Sheehan, Baird, Lowe, Keenan, Hansen, JGP, Crowley and even Harry Byrne and Ciaran Frawley. The latter didn't pan out, but he's not afraid of giving opportunities.

    He doesn't care about contractual status or pecking orders. I don't see how you can look at the last three years of his tenure and think he'll select a player that he thinks isn't the best available.

    Post edited by Clegg on


  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,555 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    hummm... i wonder why all those games given to Joey Carbery, Jack Carty, Billy Burns and Ross Byrne didnt actually make them better test rugby players... seeing as your clear factor for making a test rugby player is minutes playing at test level. strange one that, its almost as if it disproves your opinion.

    or maybe, just maybe, someone like forde might actually become a better rugby player by training and playing alongside Bundee for the next 2 years? could that be possible? Could it actually be possible that someone like Osbourne might actually benefit from training and playing outside of a player like bundee for a couple of season should the situation arise?

    your opinion that older players should be cut would have had sexton in the trash heap in 2020.



  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'd say the IRFU get a lot of ROI on any contract given to Bundee, he's a big draw in Galway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 27,620 ✭✭✭✭phog


    It is mad to suggest that this is anything but a good thing for Irish Rugby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Augme


    I've no real issue with Aki getting a contract extension but I would have an issue if he starts the vast majority of games for the next two years. There's needs to be a focus on trying to transition between the old timers and their potential replacements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,670 ✭✭✭OldRio


    For goodness sake don't bring common sense into it. Things like logic have no place here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,267 ✭✭✭Nigzcurran


    So let's get this straight,you want to dump one of our best players who's just been nominated for world player of the year? For an unproven youngster who may or may not come good in time for 2027? More complete nonsense from you

    Time is contagious, everybody's getting old.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,165 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Planning today around what will be taking place 4 years from now is just the height of folly. None of those players might be anywhere near the squad (I highly doubt Frawley will for one).

    There is not a team on the planet that essentially fires all their 30+ old players the day after a world cup, the obsession among some that Ireland should do it is ridiculous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TRC10




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Because what we've been doing has worked so well



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,555 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    like i said, mentioning RWC 27 is a complete waste of breath. it is not a factor to be considered at all.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,165 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ah, this classic trope.

    We haven't succeeded, therefore by definition anything we do differently is the right move. This is, obviously, not correct. You also haven't countered the point that this is not something any of the other successful teams does either.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,555 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    yep, every country bar the world cup winners are doing everything wrong every single year. sure why bother even playing the game at all?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,054 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    If the World Cup is all that matters (and that’s what you seem to be heavily implying here), I presume we won’t hear any criticism or negativity from you around performances / results etc in the meantime.

    Right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,873 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    while i would agree in theory, it also is a good idea to keep him around for the first year/two years of this cycle while the 10(s) gain further experience, given the unfortunate injury profiles that GR and RH have



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,054 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    No other serious rugby nation would be doing this.

    I’d wager the exact opposite of this is true.

    There isn’t a serious rugby nation in the world who would discard a player playing the best rugby of their career, to the point they’ve been nominated for World Player of the Year, even if they are 33.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,114 ✭✭✭✭Pudsy33


    We won a grand slam 7 months ago, I reckon its going fine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TRC10


    We've never won a knockout game at the World Cup



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I mean, some of them have won knockout games in their history.



Advertisement
Advertisement