Another senseless shooting that led to a young black woman being killed, along with her unborn child. Two surviving children left without a mother. Going by the bodycam footage, she looks terrified. Nobody deserves to lose their life over such a trivial incident.
🤣 you have no credibility, i think its fair to say that as all your attempted points have been rebutted, you are just resorting to nonsense accusations. Good luck with that.
Prove they are all bad
A breathtaking admission you don't really understand the rotten apple proverb.
Welcome to boards, mr credibility!
Try looking at it on this video, she made no attempt to "roll" the car, she was accelerating with intent to get to speed out of the lot.
If anyone drives a car -- a deadly weapon -- into police officers, they will shoot you.
This is particularly true in the United States, where they take law enforcement very seriously.
It was utterly reckless for a pregnant woman to attempt to do something so needlessly dangerous.
I have looked at the video. She is going at no speed and the cop could have got out of the way. But he decided to kill her instead.
And look where the car ended up. She was dead and it kept rolling. You telling me that action put nobody else in danger?
Disgusting from you justifying the murder of a pregnant woman who was stopped by cops for nothing.
I don't hear any engine acceleration, it's an internal combustion engine model; she clearly rolls the car.
"It's a police terror state so just comply TM"
She didn't drive the car into a police officer and she did not use it as a deadly weapon.
Yes he made no attempt to move because she was legally detained and should not have been leaving yet she continued to drive into the cop, unlike a reasonable person who would have switched off the engine, got out, and talked about the situation. If i was innocent i certainly would be making moves to flee legal detainment and assaulting a cop with a car.
Better than where the car could have ended up from her trying to speed away from the scene.
Justified homicide, not murder.
Yes he made no attempt to move
We're not blind, we can literally see him trying to shuffle to keep himself in front of the rolling vehicle. Rolling away from him.
She didn't assault anyone with the car. She steered hard right and only then rolled away on idle power in Drive gear.
And yet he was able to get out of the way after he murdered her and the car kept rolling, while putting other members of the public at risk.
Your video proves my point that the car was going at no speed and that the cop could have got out of the way easily. Because after he killed her he jumped out of the way of the moving car.
Keep justifying murderers there like a good person.
Where would the car have ended up, exactly?
Well i think at this point its a case of we agree to disagree.
She hadn’t stolen anything and the cops had no evidence she stole anything in the first place.
Justified homicide alright. What a disgusting comment that is.
Indeed. If her foot was anywhere near the accelerator when she was shot, the vehicle would have slammed into the side of the store, not rolled to a stop.
Did the cop get out of the way of the car after he murdered her, yes or no?
That is crazy logic isn't it.
You're a cop and you think wow, someone is assaulting me with a car, I literally and sincerely fear for my life, so -- let me jump in front of the car, shoot, then jump out of the way. Whew. Can't wait to **** my wife when I get home.
Or you're really, really in this situation where, someone REALLY wants to kill you with a vehicle, you're standing there and there's seconds to think so you... continue to stand there, line up a shot and/or spray and pray? Uh well great, you might have killed the driver, a passenger, maybe a bystander somewhere, oh and the vehicle is still a 0.5 to 1.5 ton mass travelling at speed aaaand you are quadriplegic now. Maybe just step the **** out of the way?
Do you have proof she didnt steal anything? No?
I believe i covered this earlier that an accusation of theft was made against her, the cops then had a reasonable articulable suspicion to detain her under Terry law for the purpose of investigating the alleged crime. Of course at that stage they had no proof for or against her as they were investigating which is the procedure to determine if she should be arrested for same alleged crime.
Keep spouting the nonsense that they had no evidence, it doesn't change the fact that fleeing a legal detainment is a crime, assaulting a cop with a car is a crime, she got shot for the trouble and is dead.
The kinetic force value of an assault, weather low or high does not negate the fact an assault has been committed. If the cop had moved she would have sped away from legal detainment resulting in a high speed chase where potentially other people would be in danger of said chase.
Albert Einstein: The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
This is what your repeated strawman arguments are at this stage, all your are doing to trying convinces yourselves how right you are and how you lack critical thinking skills to deal with just the facts, leaving race, emotion out of judging the situation on merit.
This isn't true; the officer was almost ran over.
Take a look at 1:39 here, and how very close it was for the officer to have lost his footing.
No he wasn't, if you look at the entire video she cuts the wheel fully to the right before rolling the vehicle forward, and he proceeds to keep stepping in front of it with his gun out, with one hand on the vehicle and one hand on the gun, is this how they are trained to shoot?
In your version of events she aimed the vehicle at him and slammed the accelerator. That is a total fantasy, that did not happen here.
She proceeded to drive through an officer.
If she is willing to apply deadly force to an officer, the officer has a right to defend himself with deadly force.
Are you telling me the officer has a car through him right now?
Stop being so daft please. She did not apply deadly force.
If a police officer is standing in front of the vehicle and the occupant of that vehicle nonetheless proceeds to accelerate that vehicle forward then yes, they could have killed the officer.
As it transpired, she didn't -- but the police officer had to act as if it could have happened. Hindsight is a great thing, but these officers have to act in the moment, making split decisions on the most appropriate course of action in often very difficult circumstances.
For your argument to have consistency Rapid, you're telling me these climate protestors should have feared for their lives and shot at these officers?
Why use lethal force TM in this situation, or are you gonna say the officers had used no lethal force? 😶
Used vastly more force than Ta'Kiya did in rolling her car gently to the right. None of the other officers seemed to recognize it as an imminent danger though and nobody came to blow his brains out for the good of society.
Oh the "let's ignore the fact they allegedly train rigorously for this circumstance" defense.
All you're doing is waffling and hand wringing now. She did not use lethal force, she didn't assault him with the vehicle, he had ample opportunity to get out of any harms way, and there is no indication she was an immediate threat to society, off to conduct a mass shooting like the case of Officer Jonathan Brown. All she was about to destroy was a bottle of liquor and her liver. Very similarly in another case, Officer Brown jumped in front of a car and killed the driver. This was blatantly against department policy which stipulated officers consider their own regard for their own safety when determining the use of lethal force. However a jury found that he had reasonable articulable and evidentiary suspicion to believe the driver was about to engage in a mass shooting, having responded to a call of shots fired, not a petty-thefted bottle of liquor.
He didnt have to as she was legally detained and fleeing the legal detainment.
People flee legal detainment all the time without being shot at. Fleeing is not a capital offense.
I would agree the cops in this case were wrong, they could have just arrested them protesters without incident as the protesters were just blocking and not being threatening.
Thats the difference though, they were being a nuisance but not threatening unlike the woman in this case.
Fleeing legal detainment with a cop standing on front of your car is different and you know it.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w6.vanillicon.com/v2/664b698b11ec85b4b0b9273f0c981eb9.svg)
