Not a good look. I wonder did he go because this was going to come to light?
Threadbans:
CGI_Livia_Soprano
Sorolla
Stevie2001
Rothco
realdanbreen
Paterson Jerins
Aldo006
HBC08
Clay Shaw
Pintman Paddy Losty
northknife
StevenToast
ButtersSuki
Bobson Dugnutt
T. Wogan and G. Ryan were amongst those cited as examples - so I suppose that means we're looking at the BBC and Death as being competitors for RTE talent! He was a little out of control, mummy will definitely be having a word with him over the weekend ;-)
I hear he is a nice man
Did I read somewhere that some new IFRS standard came in from Jan 2022? Maybe the way things were recorded/recognised changed from 2022 and that's how the auditors picked it up back in March when they were doing the audit. If they went back to previous years after that discovery then it would cause more questions. Maybe...
Any accountants on here know?
The barter account was deliberately excluded from audits until the new CFO insisted it be included, i.e., it was kept secret.
Is buying them through a slush fund charging 35% commission normal ?
Ever hear the saying 'If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys'?
You mightn't consider €100k to €150k peanuts, but a lot of talented, highly qualified people would consider that money peanuts. You'd have a load of people leaving RTE (and not just presenters) and the organisation would be in a jock.
The fact is that good people cost money, and if don't pay the going rate, you won't get them.
We are talking about complicity in the scheme and people don't think it is relevant why the scheme was needed in the first place?
Pay cuts announced across the company, Tubridy himself pontificating about taking a paycut while in the background RTE were skirting illegality trying to find ways to give him more money, and people want to pretend Tubridy was just a lucky beneficiary? That he was not in fact the root cause of the entire grubby little stroke? That he and his representative were not the origins of all this?
Its bizarre that people want to downplay Tubridys role in all this. Call the **** spade a spade lads.
Then give him the pay cut and have done with it.
No need to come with up any backdoors.
RTE need to grow a pair of balls.
Blind eyes could look at me and see the truth.
Lil Wayne
50% is commercial income and tickets for Rugby / CL would be standard practice in business .
The core issue is RTE being both public and private .
And the publicly saying you'd taken a pay cut. Wouldn't that be a lie?
It depends. If your employer comes back to you and says
“limnam. I’ve had to lie to some other employees and tell them that we can’t afford to pay them their Christmas bonus and that they are going to have to take a pay cut in order to give you your raise, but that’s what I’ve done. So I’m happy to tell you you’ve got that raise. Congrats!
Of course I’m going to have to be…creative… with the accounts so that the shareholders don’t see that you’re being paid more. They probably wouldn’t be pleased. But it will all be legal I just need you to understand that your pay rise needs to be…kept quiet… if you understand.”
And you stand there and say “yeah that’s fine. Where do I sign”. Then, yes, you are complicit.
As I said. It's not RT's or NK's business how the money is paid.
It's RTE's.
RTE designed it.
RTE paid it out
RTE put out false income.
RTE are at fault.
How was it found if it was 'off the books'?
Only way for Tubs to half rescue his tattered reputation is to hand back the money, end of story.
He was way overpaid as he was, even without the secret money.
100,000 or maybe 150,000 is plenty for the highest earners in RTE: we are only a small country. If they do not want that, they can F*** off and there are plenty more who will do the job.
RTE shouldn't have bowed to the request, RTE shouldn't have buried it in the slush fund, but RT and NK knew full well that is was going to be kept "off the books". Equals complicit
Absolutenly not.
RTE should have went and came up with a business case to increase his salary or told him he wasn't getting it.
RTE should be in control here.
A fairly arrogant one??
It is when you know the only way they can do it is through dirty deeds.
Because your pay is published.
And facilitate that deception with false invoices.
As I said.
I go to work to earn money. I dont want to "change" companies.
If thats what they're interested in then......
If my boss asks me whether I would like to earn an extra few euro - I certainly would accept and I would feel great within myself knowing I was highly regarded within the organisation.
any poster here would willingly take the extra few euro being offered.
Nothing wrong in getting an increase in salary for a job very well done
Maybe Tubs asked for a pay rise or didn't want a pay cut and RTE were trying to figure out ways to get him more money. That's on RTE, not Tubbs.
Fcuked if I'd be happy taking a pay cut and before I joined the public service I would have regularly asked for pay rises.
Again, nothing wrong with any of that.
Because the contractor or his agent asked for more money?
Does this really need to be answered?
I believe he’s superbly “talented” at being a medical consultant, though he doesn’t need an agent 😁
I'd try to change it from within, maybe they will too. Clear out the corruption and start afresh.
I'm fuming at the use of public money.
110k on Ruby tickets?
CL finals?
If RTE constructed the payments...
Still entirely relevant.
Because Tubridy, his agent and RTE knew his RTE remuneration gets published and subject to scrutiny.
It turned out that way because it had to.
But when more details emerge we will likely find RTE didnt come up with this alone.
It has been put to you multiple times Tubridy in his statement said he should have corrected the figures.
You seem to disgree but it is relevant to point out the man himself contradicts you.
Or maybe you think he is lying?
Your continual lack of a response is damming.
Either way, by action and inaction, lies of omission and commission he has put himself between frying pan and fire where any answer he gives about this grubby stroke damages his career.
Good luck with that.
Very disingenuous.
Why were RTE looking to increase a contractors income?
You have already pretended not to notice that question because you know if you follow it back it all leads to Tubridy, and that would be inconvenient for you.
Why would you work for a morally corrupt company?
One that offends and hurts you.
Go and work soemwhere else that will be light to your sensibilities.