Not a good look. I wonder did he go because this was going to come to light?
Threadbans:
CGI_Livia_Soprano
Sorolla
Stevie2001
Rothco
realdanbreen
Paterson Jerins
Aldo006
HBC08
Clay Shaw
Pintman Paddy Losty
northknife
StevenToast
ButtersSuki
Bobson Dugnutt
I'd suspect Dee Forbes will never set foot in front of any committee, it is already very clear that she was up to some very dodgy practices and knows full well that by speaking she can only makes things worse for herself. If she was American there would be an immediate invocation of fifth amendment rights.
Personally I think the biggest disgrace isn't the existence of a slush fund, it is that they were paying the exorbitant fees involved, fees such as 80k on a 150k transaction. That is far beyond bad practice and right into fraud as far as I am concerned. Nobody, absolutely nobody sees those fees and is ok with them, not unless they are getting a cut.
I think if Dee Forbes actually started talking the end result would be criminal charges, so she will be well advised to stay quiet permanently.
The likes of extra.ie live by the fluff pieces, probably negotiated by NKM - some people must be interested in what Lottie had for breakfast
"RTE actually paid Noel Kelly (as a consultant) to advise RTE on the best way to give more business and money to Noel Kelly - Even the West African countries haven't managed to pull that stroke"
Or even akin to, inviting the local burglar around to your house, to review your security arrangements, and paying them for their services?🙄😲😁
(Although it turns out the payments were not for these reasons anyway)
You’re overreacting here. There is an awful lot of histrionics about all this. I reckon his safety will be just fine in Montrose
Dee Forbes could be pulling a sickie, or genuinely unwell due to stress. Only she knows..
Center Parcs won't be renewing their sponsorship of Tubridys programme and likely to pull out of it altogether according to the Journal.
That's alright for you but when your a staffer in some media enterprise do you just sit there with a smug superior smile looking at your colleges who have to make their living by playing the PR provided game?.
Most or not booked or paid. They are sent in as there is always space for puff pieces and also if you publish it they will give you an exclusive in the future. If it is a big spread that is minimum one page long some payment might occur but its worth noting these won't be puff pieces.
Its looking clear to me that those employed are in a relay race.
They hand the baton to the next DirtBird who will continue the legacy and scutter of tax payer abuse.
Omerta.
Well I don't know anyone apart from you who privately believes she's unwell. But you're entitled to believe that.
It depends, if they for example put unsold late in the day advertising slots that they couldn't shift though the usual way into the barter account and they were bought up at cents on the euro, but the alternative was it was to remain unsold then 65% of something is better than 100% of nothing.
One would have to know what was lodged or bartered in order to know if using this method was offered value for money in terms of business.
I suspect that this is how it went off the main books. If the unsold slots (I'm presuming that it was used mostly for advertising sales) were given a main book value of zero but actually did manage to have some value through this side method of sales, it's easy to see how with no oversight it could become a slush fund.
I don’t believe her or disbelieve her. Nothing difficult here. Only she knows.
I don't believe her. I've gotten off the fence.
No I am just glad that I am not playing the game. I deal with certain pr companies who send me interesting stories and not puff pieces.
Surely stress and pressure are only default states of her stratospheric well paid job. Water off a ducks back so to speak in cash strapped RTE.
She tested positive for dishonesty.
I dont believe her. She is a stranger to the truth as her conduct in RTE demonstrates. So no benefit of the doubt.
The Center Parcs story is huge.
Other advertisers will probably withdraw during the Tubridy programme. This should force the RTE management to sack him.
Fair play. I’d kinda lean your way too. Just that I’d not at all be shocked if I was wrong.
Course she's not actually sick. Ridiculous conversation to even have.
I should also add none of my colleagues has ever published a puff piece.
Indeed. I agree.
There was a window where Tubridy could have donated the money. It was the obvious thing to do given how much his radio gig is worth. If he had done that he might get back on air sooner.
So either RTE cant get rid of him without huge payout
Or there is more to come that even donating the money would not atone for.
In a way they have no choice of they want to stay on the gravy train. They are obligated to appear before Oireachtais Committees if employed in a position of responsibility public body. If you have left ( Dee Forbes) you are not obligated.
For people in senior positions and significant salary's they seem to be ''not very capable''. Was it a case of ''see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil''. Normally the first rule of public bodies is ''cover you ar5e''.
If I owed a large company I would expect better of senior executives.
I've said that and more all day.
Just on RT donating the money. That would mean he’d have to admit that he never should have taken it (which he shouldn’t). I don’t think he thinks like this. Very self indulged individual
so the "taxpayer" was "defrauded".. I'm quoting Richard Collins.. law broken? arrests?
It was an opinion, said rather lamely. Awful long way to go before any arresting
The "donate the money" thing seems strange to me.
If a mate scams a tenner from me and gets caught, yes I would like to have the money back, but getting it back won't change the fact that he pulled a scam on me in the first place.
So why exactly would returning the money absolve Tubridy of the stain on his character?
Donate within his first statement would have been the right thing to do and brought a lot of support for him, but we now know he's a money hungry so and so and not a penny will be leaving his bank account
PR is selling an agenda no matter how worthy or else why would a homeless NGO need PR? Even the journal has puff pieces so your doing we to work somewhere that has none.
RTE seem to think that he's out of contract. It appears that in these personality contracts they attribute a value to radio and TV work separately. For Duffy he said his is 300 for radio and 51 for TV. It seems that the established practice in RTE is that if you change a commitment mid contract, that until a new one is put in place you are paid for the value of the work that you remain doing under the old contract. If relations hadn't soured in RTE with RT, that's likely what would have happened.
However since they are all at war in Montrose, RTE have decided that this contract is null in its entirety. It puts them in a tricky place, what do they pay him for his post late late radio work? Nothing? Pay as per the old convention, but does that imply a contract still exists and do they then have to continue to pay him?
It may end up in court tbh.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/19a7a778b727ad07a3bbcea8101c61b3.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w9.vanillicon.com/v2/969fb1b269f9df53c6c1b7670ae4616b.svg)
