So I recently took a case against my former employer to the WRC due to underpayment and won. At the hearing they begged me to settle after having ignored me for months. I have left that company now but have recently had a chat with one of the employees who's still with them. He told me that, having read my case, that he asked for the same requests (with reference to me) as me and was politely told to **** off.
I hoped that once I'd won that all the other employees at my location would kick up and that they'd easily get the same remuneration that I was granted in their payslips from now on. It seems they don't have the courage or the intelligence. Ironically a good few of them were joined a union, and I wasn't! I thought there'd be some sort of a consequence to being publicly named and shamed. The only other thing is that the case is a tiny bit complicated to understand. It's not something that you'd grasp in if you heard it as a headline while driving your car. So my question is, what can I do to draw more attention to this?
In spite of the fact that I won, the case is framed in such a way as if to imply that I lost. I challenged them on a few other things that I wasn't sure whether I was right or wrong about... taking the view that I might as well make cases about such issues while I was already reporting my main issue. I lost those cases, and in the summary of the published report, those are the ones that are mentioned first. Only down the very bottom does it mention that two issues where they underpaid me.
They were ordered to pay me within 40 days of the published report, and ended up taking 45 days. What I was paid was then taxed, which wouldn't have been taxed if I'd got it first day.