'Who we are, the world wants to be'. Yes, right.
He's not wrong.
Meanwhile the unraveling of the party continues:
well apart from describing the CNN town hall as the "lions den". CNN could not have done more to accommodate him
True, but to his base, their perception would be 'alpha move' with DeSantis relying on careful screening of journalists at conferences and standing around a bunch of cops etc. for optics as 'beta'
This "alpha" "beta" claptrap is such stupid terminology.
That's the code they talk to themselves with. The Nick Adamses and Andrew Tates of the world. A staple of the "MAGA bro"
Prime evidence:
Its dire, but Bill can't come out and says he wants Trump to win the primary because that's given the game away. He and the other professional never trumpers need Trump to win the primary to keep the money rolling in.
Nate Silver alluded to this earlier
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1661369968624058376?cxt=HHwWkIC2xeTLr44uAAAA
To be fair to the 'NeverTrumpers,' more than a couple candidates are literally just Trump surrogates.
So what really is the political deference these pro-seditionists should be receiving to be treated well or even endorsed by NeverTrumpers?
Show me them attacking Asa Hutchinson, then we could say they've gone stark mad.
Speaking of which, Tim Scott's announcement was weird, 'I'm failing at civics, so I'm running for President!'
He's also suddenly quite shouty, which is entirely out of character for normally softspoken Scott.
Nick Adams has to be a troll he cant be real.
Or a real troll, but this is how they all seemingly communicate.
They want Trump to win the primary because that is where the money is. The likes of Bill Kristol who was all in the Iraq war does not care about Democracy etc. So many people need Trump to win the primary, the dead legacy networks such as CNN who hosted Trump and the professional Never Trumpers.
I don't think the never Trump movement have much power these days outside liberal circles, they seem to live on MSNBC etc anyway.
Obviously, Musk desperately wants to draw Trump back to Twitter, and to that end, he will attempt to buoy up Trump's biggest rival, making Trump feel like he has no choice but to come back on and not let DaSantis have fairly uncontested access to the set who are on Twitter but not Truth Social. Then it's all about the incessant flaming and sniping between Trump/DeSantis and their respective supporters, driving up user engagement and all that sweet money for Musk.
WTAF... That bit at the end about the 'eye of Sauron turning on the American people?" That's a *sitting Congresswoman" speaking at a press conference based on the farcical 'weaponization' investigation. Harriet Hageman of Wyoming. Wyoming has one.
She’s as mad as a box of hammers.
I honestly thought pictures of her on the internet were George Santos in drag 🫤
She's got a facebook page... You can imagine.
Republicans take credit for hostage taking on debt ceiling/govt shutdown.
The fact she replaced Cheney is a great indication of the calibre that appeals to Republican voters now a days.
Fantastic comedy.
‘Americans are struggling to make ends meet under Biden’s economy,’
except when they’re not, as Republicans clamor to explain why they’re forcing a government shut down isn’t bad for the Econ.
RNC openly declaring that defaulting on our debts helps the party of fiscal responsibility somehow.
For someone who doesn’t support Trump, you sure do defend him an awful lot.
I've condemned January 6, and I've repeatedly said I wouldn't vote nor support Trump at the next election.
You're making things up.
I don't think anyone has to discredit him at this stage. All there is to do is sit back and watch the shitshow play out.
Buddy, I am not going to link to all the times you have defended Trump. What do you take me for?
I didn't say I never defended Trump.
I said I have a more objective perspective; acknowledging flaws whilst also accepting some of the benefits of his administration, and policies generally. That's what a genuine analysis consists of.
I do not have this evangelical perspective that Trump is the the source of all human evil.
Actual comments on thread calling Trump the source of all evil? Well?
So unless you can provide these quotes you just holed your own argument below the waterline.
So nope. Thats a strawman you have invented in yet another defence of Trump. How is that 'objective'? It isnt remotely because your statement is false and without foundation.
Trump was found liable in a court of law for sexual assault. And still you defended him.
So spare us claims of a more òbjective perspective when you threw out every argument you could lay you hands on to dispute the trial and verdict. Including attacking the victim herself. Yet where were the attacks on Trump? Thats a more objective persepective in your book? More objective than the trial jurors,that found him guilty?
'Objective' statement of fact: Trump is a sex offender, verdict of court.
And you defend him. Including in relation to that sexual assault.
Your claims of objectivity are discredited by your own posts.
As for acknowledging his flaws. You do not. You do not post unprompted criticisms of Trump or as part of a broad analysis. Any remarks critical of Trump have to be dragged out of you after multiple times of asking.
Trumps future possibly includes a return to the presidency. That is the context of the remarks critical of his conduct in office and personal character which manifests daily. We should also view his past conduct through the prism of such current actions. Any benefit of the doubt is long gone.
Trump continues to troll Jean Carroll further defaming her and incriminating himself.
Here's the now defunct GBnew thread... https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058116572/new-alternative-news-channel-gb-news-chaired-by-andrew-neil-launching-read-op-before-posting#latest . Now there's some evangelical style posting. Your lack of self-awareness (or trolling) is epic.
Donald Trump needs no help discrediting himself. Most posts here are simply showing what he, or those associated with him, has/have actually said or done.
Objective?
Really?
Pull the other one.
The same GB News that was going to cease broadcasting at the end of 2021 ?
You were right!!
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w6.vanillicon.com/v2/664b698b11ec85b4b0b9273f0c981eb9.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w7.vanillicon.com/v2/7eb61b90d43b6a9f2815c2a58d0f497f.svg)
