Which side will debate the facts when presented with opposing salient emperical facts and which side run, ignore, or whatabout when shown that they're incorrect?
Agreed. When more outrage is directed at the steering wheel of a limo than there is at the botched withdrawal of afghanistan which handed the country over to the Taliban and set womens rights back decades even centuries , then you know you're dealing with a level of mind control that's never before seen and will never be seen again in our lifetimes.
Why did Trump agree to the withdrawal then? Could it be that the man found guilty of sexual assault and who boasted about grabbing women by their genitals cares nothing for women?
This post is even more ironic when it was Trump who botched the withdrawal.
If you dispute this go ahead, show us Trump's plan and resources for the withdrawal and how it had any chance of success. If you want to fault Biden for not ripping up Trump's disastrous policy and plan, go ahead also.
A U.S. review led by the National Security Council of the chaotic 2021 withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan largely lays the blame on former President Donald Trump, saying President Joe Biden was “severely constrained” by the decisions of his predecessor.
“President Biden’s choices for how to execute a withdrawal from Afghanistan were severely constrained by conditions created by his predecessor,” the White House summary states, noting that when Biden entered office, “the Taliban were in the strongest military position that they had been in since 2001, controlling or contesting nearly half of the country.”
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/u-s-review-of-chaotic-afghanistan-withdrawal-blames-trump
You care about women's rights but defend a guy found liable for sexual assault of a woman?
Fantastic 👏👏👏
Speaking of that still haven’t heard your outrage that trump negotiated with the terrorists and released 5,000+ of them from prison?
You care about women's rights yet applaud the guy who installed judges to get rid of access to abortion?
False. The withdrawal was conditions based and the conditions were not right when the towel was abruptly thrown in. To blame it on Trump further exemplifies what i just touched upon above.
You've been fact checked bellow by the United States Government . Debate over
President Biden and his Administration’s decisions during the Afghanistan withdrawal led to the deaths of 13 servicemembers, left Americans completely stranded, allowed U.S. military equipment to fall into Taliban hands, jeopardized progress made by Afghan women, and destabilized the entire region
Being fact checked by Comer? ROFL.
fact check this mate
And there's another linkdump that you've not read.
There's not the merest modicum of sincerity in your posts, frankly.
The conditions were not right because that was HOW Trump had set it up.
So basically you just admitted Biden should have ripped up Trump's plan and reversed his policy and sent back in more US troops. That Trump had set the situation up as a failure. But somehow this is a defence of Trump!
Statement of fact:
When Biden entered office, “the Taliban were in the strongest military position that they had been in since 2001, controlling or contesting nearly half of the country.”
As to your other faux concern about women's rights, at which point do you come to the conclusion Trump cared about them - was it when he said "Grab em by the pussy?" All the time he spent creeping around dressing rooms at beauty pageants? Perving over female journalists? Him being found liable for sexual assault??? Well? Which one was it???
FBI agents with a rare vestige of integrity who went to seniors to say what they were doing was wrong have been silenced , sacked and denied whistleblower protection are speaking before Congress. The truth is all coming out now. You're either for the truth or you're not.
You’re awfully gullible clearly
protection is not privileged for those agents who supported the insurrection or illegally downloaded files onto a flash drive. This must be what republicans meant when they said their whistleblowers who hadn’t simply disappeared were all in jail 🤡 “rare vestige of integrity” ROFLMAO
Another tedious dump with more conspiracy stuff. No thank.
Care to address the previous posts in any substantive way at all, before dumping (dump being the operative word) another link you've probably not read?
Conservatives judge people on who they are, not what they do.
By this ironic piece of logic, you must be a conservative too.
As usual, you don't read the links that you post. The only mistake (if any) that the FBI made was taking so long to suspend these two miscreants - one who downloaded data to a thumbdrive in violation of his job, another who shared things via email that were, to put it politely, 'out there.'
But, feel free to rebut after you've fully read the link - do you agree with their suspensions? Why or why not?
I expect you, like the other trumpbutts here, won't reply. Bluck, bluck, ba-gaaack!
'Judging people on who they are' is a QED of "what they do"
What are you blathering about
Dunno what Republicans expected, that the Dems would just sit there and let them put on the charade?
Jim gets himself right triggered reminding himself how much blather he made about whistleblowers during impeachment one 🤣
Fox News already analysing the hearing as a farce over GOP trying to withhold information from dems against house rules to try and conjure up perry mason moments.
I haven't seen that many self-burns since the I visited a pyromaniac ward the day after Halloween....
Trump told Jr. to ease up on the coke
That's what happens when you just read the heavily spun tweet headline and don't bother to read the actual articles before you breathlessly post them as "gotchas" when they really really aren't.
Reading is hard for some unfortunate people.
'I love the poorly educated' Donald Trump
MTG claims being called a "white supremacist" is the same as calling a person of color "the N-word"
Which cannot logically be true even to her as she happily said one of those things verbatim and talked in code about the other owing to how hateful and offensive the term is.
I do love when they try to conflate words as being as bad as the n-word yet still are unable to say it, the word you won't say is always going to be the worse word.
Republican star witness, so-called whistleblower, getting roundly excoriated with receipts for his own tweets and self promotions seeking to among other things, defund the FBI and calling on ordinary citizens to pressure local law enforcement to refuse cooperation with the FBI on any criminal investigations. It was also noted he lined up a book tour to coincide with his testifying before Congress, and that this hearing coincides with law enforcement appreciation week. One can only guess how many copies will be pre-purchased by the RNC.
The woman is a real poster-child for the Trump movement. Dumb and uneducated. Just comes out with soundbytes and quotes without even really understanding what she's saying. Bizarre.
More skewering of the witness and additional uncovered conflicts of interest: he received financial donations from Republicans, including from within the Trump inner circle.
“We established earlier credibility matters, certainly for witnesses who appear before us. Mr. Boyle, do you know who Kash Patel is?” Goldman, a former federal prosecutor, asked Boyle.
“I do,” Boyle answered.
“Have you received any money from Kash Patel or his organization?” Goldman asked.
“I have,” replied Boyle.
“When you previously met with the majority members and or majority staff of this committee, was Kash Patel present for that meeting?” Goldman asked.
“No,” Boyle replied.
“To your knowledge, has Kash Patel ever spoken to the committee members on your behalf?” Goldman pressed.
“Not that I know of,” Boyle replied.
“Not that you know of. Was anyone present for your previous meetings with committee members and staff on the majority that were not members of this committee or staff of this committee?” Goldman asked.
“My counsel,” Boyle replied.
“Your counsel? Anyone else?” Goldman asked.
“I don’t think so,” Boyle replied.
“Is Kash Patel helping you finance your counsel?” Goldman asked.
“Not that I’m aware of,” Boyle replied.
“Okay. And, Mr. Friend, what about you?” Goldman asked turning to the other witness. “Are you, do you know, Kash Patel as well?”
“Yes,” Friend replied.
“And did you receive any money from Kash Patel,” Goldman asked.
“Yes. He gave me a donation last November,” Friend replied.
“A donation?” Goldman asked.
“Are you a charitable organization?” Goldman shot back.
“I was an unpaid, indefinitely suspended man trying to feed his family. And he’s reached out to me and said he wanted to give me a donation,” Friend replied.
“Did he have any… Was he present for any of your meetings with committee members or staff?” Goldman asked.
“No,” Friend replied.
Goldman continued to grill Friend about his connection to Patel and whether or not he requested documents and testimony he provided not be shared with Democrats on the committee – a common complaint the minority made against the GOP majority during the hearing.
There really are just really really bad at this aren't they?
The utter incompetence of everyone remotely associated with the modern GOP never ceases to amaze me.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w6.vanillicon.com/v2/664b698b11ec85b4b0b9273f0c981eb9.svg)
