The war wont be won or lost until the Ukrainian counterattack succeeds
Yes. But really it's down to the excellent radar on the SU-35 and its long range BVR missiles. However, their pilots are shockingly badly trained, and have no ability to conduct asymmetrical warfare etc.
F-16's will not go to Ukraine, in my opinion. What they need is effective anti-air systems, and lots of them. This will take away Russian goals of air superiority. NATO is already giving the Ukranians tracking data with their AWACS aircraft. They now need the systems to deal with the target's. Much more efficient.
How could it be a victory to give the foreseeable future winning and losing the odd town and City, Russia aren't going to achieve their objective which was conquering Ukraine, they are the invading force so the current stalemate is a failure/loss.The only question is how much more damage will be done before they accept it.
Contested can be enough. Here's a map of the situation in Stalingrad on 18th November 1942. The black line is the front line and the grey line outlines the extent of the city's built-up areas. Note that the Germans held all of downtown Stalingrad, the high ground of the Mamayev Kurgan, and most of the factory district, with the Russians barely hanging on in the Red October factory. Meanwhile Hitler was bragging to a Munich audience about how they had "just about" taken the whole city. But while he was bragging, the fat lady was warming up...
So if the conflict is frozen as is, Ukraine win despite losing the land bridge to Crimea, and the rest of luhansk oblast?
What planet is this guy on? That's like saying Germany and Poland were friends in 1939 just because you could put them together on a map. lol.
No, they will be both losers in that scenario. But one loser will continue to be backed by the West. The other will be devoured by China.
Both losers, but with one loser gaining a decent chunk of the others' territory.
a pyrrhic victory maybe, but hard to describe it as both sides losing.
Anyways the point is that the OP claimed its a foregone conclusion that Russia have already lost & Ukraine have won - until the Ukrainian counterattack happens , that is not the case
Bakhmut still holds despite all your propaganda.
That’s just one scenario, yours.
I don’t see any scenario where the Muscovites back home genuinely will think they have won.
Bearing in mind Putin will declare victory even if Russia is pushed back to its borders and its conventional army decimated. Something like, giving the “Nazis” a lesson. Whatever, we know he’ll make something up for the masses(including some further afield) to swallow. Then Russia goes down the sink hole as China’s lapdog.
Just reward for his true leadership.
Russia havent taken one of their main objectives yet in the war,first it was whole of Ukraine,then Kiyv,now its Donbas,but that failed too.
So basically Russia have lost allready,strategically
Taking Bakhmut wont make much of a difference
And with the staggering losses,Russia cant keep doing this to capture every city in ukraine
It remains to see what priorities Ukraine have,take Bakhmut,or cut of the landbridge to Crimea,or both.
I am pretty sure they will use some sort of deception first to fool the Russian into a different area,like last time,before they attack.
Russia lost morally and maybe physically/economically from day one. The world will never be the same again.
Can someone get those files? I need them for science
Edit: the pics are for reference only according to the op
Waaaait a minute. Is he suggesting that the Russians are only hiring their female propaganda talking-heads on the basis of their sex-appeal and not their political acumen?! Say it isn't so chief!
:P
Research is a pain, but gawd dammit, somebody’s got to do it!
They haven't even won this one despite 9 months and 10's of thousands of dead.
I knew she was a little filth
Further down on that thread… oh, and uncensored picture…
I just think is gas that people join the Irish Navy and expect a Monday 9-5 (and actually get it a lot of the time, which is half the battle) ...
I spoken to a few in it an it does seem like a grim job though, with low chances of progression
Be putting my money on lost. Counterattack with what? Pressganged untrained kids without artillery or air superiority.
Ukraine will be out of 155mm Artillery shells by early summer, NATO does not have the capability to continue supply. Will never have the capability of having air superiority.
Time for common since and diplomacy.
So, you’re betting on the whole of the West not being able to compete with Russian artillery production? You do realise Russia has a finite store of artillery and then have to rely on present day Moscovy production 🤡
It’s less about “could the west” and more about “will the west” continue to prop them up to the degree they need to be?”
It’s likely some form of truce will have to be made, especially if predictions are for a lot more bloodshed on both sides but with very little gain aka a stalemate.
But who knows, maybe it suits Putin to keep this war going for whatever reason.
What diffence does joining NATO make for a few fiber optic cables off the coast if they can just venture further out than the EEZ and interfere with them in International waters and out of our sight?
If it comes to it the West will continue to support the Proxy war against Russia. Cheapest war to deplete Russia imaginable.
Go on, let your fantasies run wild… how would a long drawn out war against Ukraine suit Putin. I’ll be waiting…
https://images.app.goo.gl/d4fCeoXaYwnbuWZG7
Loving all the shills… ‘maybe we should, you know, possibly give diplomacy a try… best way to sort out that big meany Putin.’
🤪 best indicator possible Russia/its supporters knows they are in big trouble.
Ireland joining NATO would pave the way for US bases on Irish soil, which can then patrol our EEZ and harass Russian ships.
Not true at all
It wouldn't be the first time
I say that Xi Jinping could smell the crazy off putin, cant back a nut job.... just steal his resources/take advantage of him.