You mean like the virtue signalling Democrats , do as we say not do as we do ?
You'd think Democrats like the Clintons, The Obamas , the Pelosis etc were living in a slum.
They like money just as much as Republicans, alot of whom were wealthy before entering politics unlike many high profile Democrats.
Lets be honest here, US politics revolves around money.
Do you actually think they watched a single second of tape?! Of course not, they will sooner believe Trump reached into the cockpit of the presidential limousine to wrestle control away from a secret service agent before they believe irrefutable video evidence. People who believe the former over the latter are too far gone , in fact they will only trust their media even more after you show them lies and deception on an immeasurable scale.
In the real world Jan 6th will never be looked at the same way ever again. The democrats have been exposed as the liars and manipulators we all knew they already were. This is been a huge turning point and its really only the beginning once this guy gets released
You seem to be ignoring the question about your belief of trump/russia money link, would you care to answer that?
It shouldn't have to be explained to you, but riots over systemic social injustice and racism does not equate to lads ransacking the Capitol building because their racist, corrupt and morally reprehensible leader lost a free and fair election
I already addressed that issue before and nothing has changed since, I'm not wasting time going over it.
What about the other fella and Ukraine money link, thats alot more relevant now.
Au Contraire
Yes and we remember your denials at the trump/Russia connections, yet you must have read this right?
GOP operative sentenced to 18 months for funneling Russian money to Trump
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/02/jesse-benton-donald-trump/
Judge finds a "pattern of deception" by a longtime Republican consultant.
Actual court conviction as opposed to a conjecture piece of journalism
"What about the other fella"
Literal whataboutery....
If you looked up a dictionary, you would not find a better example.
Kudos!
There's a whole thread for that, - clearly you don't want to waste time being wrong about that, either, given you're not talking about it in that thread - in fact in it you last called that a "Nothing burger."
Deny dodge deflect to something else or are you all out of deflection
Yeah the lads have no issue with their man's ethics and strong family ties with Ukraine
Back to Trump this is great to see 😆
There's a whole thread for that, - clearly you don't "have no issue with" it either, given your lack of presence on that thread. Deny dodge deflect to something else or are you all out of deflections.
Oh I've a few posts to make on that thread a bit later! Don't you worry
Oh, good. Then we can get back to the topic here as we've exhausted your distractions, which was Trumps ties to Russia and the Insurrection.
"Unwoke America"
Ffs
Jacob Chansley PLED GUILTY....
“The defendant then stalked the hallowed halls of the building, riling up other members of the mob with his screaming obscenities about our nation’s lawmakers, and flouting the ‘opportunity’ to rid our government of those he has long considered to be traitors.”
Thats a quote printed Nov 2021 about Chansley. Its a proven falsity as there is now video evidence that proves he attempted to de-escalate the crowd before they got inside. Along with the 5 police who were "killed that day" , its just lie after lie about an insurrection that never happened.
the cockpit of the presidential limousine
Can you point out where the "cockpit" is.
You seem to be implying you think it is physically impossible for a passenger to physically attack the driver but clearly it's the case they can. Not rocket science or avionics I'm afraid for the deniers - simply roll down the partition between the driver and the passengers and grab your lad by the throat.
This was all testified to under oath, and penalty of perjury and serious jail time. The other persons involved in the incident despite swift public denials all refused to similarly testify, under oath, and penalty of perjury and serious jail time.
And the fella your tweet is about pleaded guilty in a court of law.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/defendants/chansley-jacob-anthony
I see nothing there about Trump getting money for favours.
Benton was acting for himself and he took the money, a conman.
Its standard procedure for people to donate to political campaigns isnt it, the Democrats generally raise alot more than Republicans do they not ?
Do you believe all of these huge donations are no strings attached, with no favours expected ???
There is far too much money, lobbying in US politics.
Thats a lovely piece, such a showman.
Oh,
then you clearly didn't read the article again. Bad faith arguments again.
Jesse Benton, a longtime aide to both Ron and Rand Paul, was convicted in November on six related charges. The court found that he and another GOP operative accepted $100,000 from Roman Vasilenko, a St. Petersburg-based influencer who wanted photos with Trump to display on his social media accounts. Benton kept most of the money for himself but donated $25,000 to the Republican National Committee as part of a plan to secure two tickets to a fundraising event for Trump in Philadelphia. At the event, Vasilenko was allowed to sit close to Trump at a roundtable discussion and later took a photo with him. Foreign nationals, like Vasilenko, are not allowed to donate to US political campaigns or committees, and it is illegal to make a donation on behalf of someone else.
And remember, this was all verified by the courts. As an inaugural fundraising event, Trump directly benefited.
Trump spokeswoman Hope Hicks said Tuesday that the Trumps did not approve the early draft invitation [obtained by TMZ and confirmed by ABC News], which said donors who contribute $500,000 or $1 million would get private receptions with Donald Trump Sr., as well as a multiday hunting or fishing trip with one or both of his sons.
Despite the PR firefighting by Hope Hicks Trump still honored the man's $100k donation favor.
An insurrection I destincly remember watching in real time on the day. That insurraction that never happened? Whatever is going on about this Chansely fella, throwing in that this thing didn't even happen, when it clearly did, in broad daylight in front of the entire world goes beyond just being dishonest.
Reality is a cruel mistress, who will not smile upon whatever nonsense fiction you've decided to buy into. Facts do not care about your need to feel special.
How is it a "proven falsehood" ?
Unless there was a video camera following him for the whole day and you've watched it , this proves or disproves absolutely nothing.
Him being filmed for a few seconds reading out a Trump tweet and saying "go home" does not for a moment prove that he did not do all the things that he pled guilty to at some other point in time.
If that was the case , then Begby absolutely did not throw that glass in that pub.
Free Begby , he's an innocent man and we have the video to prove it!!
I presume this will be about some mythical evidence that Guilani or someone else has been sitting on for years. Evidence that will be revealed in..... wait for it.... two weeks?
(Why is it ALWAYS two weeks?)
It'll be released during infrastructure week...
Happy to defend my position.
Jan 6th
BLM protests
Are you still confused and think the two types of events were the same?
Literally the pot calling the kettle black.
lol.
But yeah, it's ALWAYS "Two weeks" away. Guillani had evidence of Dominion tampering. Was gonna come out "In two weeks". They had evidence of voter fraud "in two weeks". Hunter's LAPTOP!!!! Evidence in.... Guess.
I think I commented on timeframe previously. I suppose it's so that, when it doesn't manifest, people will have forgotten the promise.
But I mean anyway, when someone believes that that insurrection "debunking" episode, you know where they are at. A video even the GOP don't believe. A video even the GOP says misrepresented the Jan 6 insurrection attempt.... From a host even the owner of the station is calling a liar. Honestly. Somebody ACTUALLY thinks qanon shaman was being given a tour by the police.... Where do you do with that? How does one debate a person who believes that?
Im well aware of your position, you have reiterated it many times, mostly ad nauseum in the BLM thread.
Frankly its one I and many others do not agree with.
And yet, as just now, you can neither counter it, or accept it.
Why is that? Genuine question, why can't you accept the facts which are irrefutable in this respect?
I and many others have countered it, often at great length multiple times before. Often ad nauseum.
It was futile though as a dog with a bone wont give up.
Literal whataboutery.... If you looked up a dictionary, you would not find a better example.
You also don't agree with facts, though. Your disagreement means nothing, we've seen what you agree with.
Then you clearly didn't read the article again. Bad faith arguments again.
Anything else to add ?
