I wonder how this will work out for him
Threadbanned Posters:
Hamsterchops
take everything
road_high
FixdePitchmark
gk5000
I would have thought professional qualifications are more indicative than employment status. Does someone stop being a software engineer if Google let them go?
I don’t watch tv but I can imagine 🤣. Dermot Morgan would have had great craic with them all 🤣
This case could affect the career prospects of his siblings as well. We saw what happened to Ammi before this. And now what's going on with Enoch. Would any prospective employer really want to take on a Burke, knowing the baggage that comes with them?
From 3.34 or so on
https://www.rte.ie/radio/podcasts/22214538-berties-back-lilts-dead-enoch-burkes-forever/
A few??? 😅
Yes and my response was in relation to them admiring him standing up for his beliefs. Lots of people have different beliefs, it doesn’t mean they should be commended for it no matter what their beliefs are.
Not all beliefs are equal, if you believe you are being wronged and stand up for yourself, it would inconceivable that your belief could be construed as being equivalent to that of a serial killer.
How do you mean? At a time when the curriculum is being revised, it's hardly coincidence, no
Just ignore him.Sate has wasted too much money on him already.
Ignoring him isn’t an option. That’s a “kick the can down the road” approach. Deal with him, FFS
Actions have consequences
Agree. Similar to the Bertie thread, the man needs to be made a show of (and repeatedly) to ensure he does not get his desired outcome.
Ignoring has failed terribly
So what do you suggest?? How would you make a show of him?
Jail, sequestration of assets, etc. It’s not about letting him off to save the state money. It’s about deterrence, justice and the rule of law. It’s not a century and more ago in the Wild West
Back to jail would be a start. Income attachment order to ensure the fine gets paid. A couple of well deserved put-downs by the Judge (i've seen judges refer to defandants as "gobsh1tes" before so there is precedant). My imagination doesn't stretch much further so apologies but there's 3 fairly simple ones.
He had other options to stand up for his beliefs that were legal. He didn’t take them and chose to be a bully, demand that the school follow his beliefs and defy court orders instead. That is not something to be admired! He could very well have stood up for his beliefs and met with the principal and discussed his concerns without all this nonsense! He expects the school to follow court orders if they are in his favour of course.
Jail & fines have been or are currently in play and don't seem to have much effect. Burkes principled objections rise above such paltry matters.
So you better come up with some other way of making a show of him, if you think that appropriate.
On a kind of related matter, I read that Kate Forbes, one of the main contenders for leadership of the Scottish National Party, is from an evangelical background and would be perfectly in tune with Enoch in terms of views on same sex marriage and trans genderism etc. So Burke is not some outlier on these matters..
Those fines should be paid for a start, he owes the courts thousands.
she is smart enough not to verbally abuse people in the pursuit of her beliefs. enoch not so much.
Well we should find out at 2pm if he has won his appeal. Then what? Who knows? 🤣
The one day it’s probably snowing in Mullingar, he’ll be in the High Court! No wonder he thinks his God is on his side….
As has been pointed out repeatedly , it's not his views per se that mark him out as an "outlier" it is his behaviour.
His BELIEFS caused NONE of those things to happen.
Burke is an outlier, even in a group of outliers :)
It’s not listed for court or electronically under his name. Do we know if he’s in court or is he outside the school? Very chilly day. Hope he has thermals!
Does the court hold session for these things? As far as I know, it's just publication of a decision and I'm assuming Enoch will be notified personally of it via mail/email.
Forbes has also stated that she supports the individuals rights so, while she may have agreed with him, it's unlikely she's be carrying on like him. Or, given that she's a politician, even condoning him.
But again, it's not viewpoints that have gotten him into trouble.
I’m guessing it’s electronic if it’s at 2pm but I’m not sure? Justice O’Moore seems to have a busy schedule in court 3 today.
He was fired for being verbally abusive to his boss. His objection boils down to "They can't fire me for being abusive". Exactly what "principled objection" are you referring to? His views on non-binary and/or transgendered students have no bearing on his situation, as they had nothing to do with his suspension, the court order, or his being sacked. So what "principled objection" do you think is actually involved?
That's why Ash Regan will win it
“Enoch Burke, his parents and three siblings are in the Court of Appeal to hear its judgment on his appeal against orders restraining him attending at Wilson's Hospital School.”
Looks like they are there after all.
they may be there but there is nothing in the diary for them. they think they can just show up and get seen. i expect that this is what is happening.