If you want to worry about Orc money in UK politics, I'd suggest a quick look at the source of team Sunak's finances - (hint) info-sys. Boris' flat and loan scandals suggest to me he was extremely bad at negotiating his portion of borscht or he didn't get any. The Torries are a dead party walking; they ought to go down for the count shortly.
Why does this and some Telegram screenshots look like ransom notes from the 1970s?
...
Looks like Biden has said no to F-16's
I didnt know I could read Ukrainian until now...
Was that created on ms paint.
Which part is the big news?
Likely enough that the US suggested they delay it until their troops were well skilled on the latest lovely force projection stuff they are getting.
Big if true?
Put the link into archive.ph and then link to its recovered version of the original.
Don't like to publicise/promote such things really...! If you google article title from the post you may be able to see it (I think).
Dang they totally forgot to include the existential threat Putin made against the UK here
Nobody ever dies in the A-Team. The Wagner group are just like the A-Team. If you`ve got problems and you know where to find them, maybe you can hire the Wagner group. (A-Team music kicks in). Just joking. But seriously, the Wagner group are private contractors. Western media certainly throws out an awful lot of fake news, some of which is genuine mistakes, some of it is extreme bias. So, like the boy who cried wolf, how are we to know if/when they report something that is actually true? We can`t know. This is why the assumption should be made that everything they report is false unless it happens to makes sense from the point of view of any given individual.
I don't suppose you know a work around for paywalls. I had one before but lost the damn link
What I find suspect is the timing of all of this. He could have shared this many months ago, but he waits until now. He’ll be facing a Standards Committee Hearing in the near future that might get him kicked out of the House if it goes very badly for him. This might be an attempt to drum up support for him so that he won’t lose his seat. (Apparently he still harbors fantasies of being PM again). It was front and center on BBC today, which just raised my eyebrow more about it.
Although Johnson’s support did offer Ukraine an early morale boost, I can’t condone his likely motivation of draping the conflict around his shoulders to deflect from the trouble he was in for being such a crap PM. Ukraine’s suffering gave him an «out» whenever he was being grilled for not doing his job, and I feel that was just despicable.
I hope he fecks off for good soon and that Ukraine can (hopefully) count on the support of actual statespeople and not a Spitting Image puppet come to life.
Johnson is a pathological liar and narcissist (as is Putin of course). I wouldn't believe a word out of either of their mouths - but I suspect Johnson has made this one up.
For those saying Johnson was telling the truth.
Downing streets readout of the call.
Have to admit, I'd rather like to see Putin follow through on that threat (assuming no collateral damage of course).
I think it's pretty clear that Johnson is trying to "Ukrainewash" his image for a future attempt at re-gaining the leadership of the Tory party. As a disgraced former PM, he's nothing more than a backbench politician and has no business visiting Kiev in any official capacity other than that of a representative of the people of Uxbridge and South Ruislip.
TBH, Johnson's putting Zelenskyy in an awkward position as he can't exactly afford to risk upsetting the British when they're a major arms producer and supporter of Ukraine by snubbing him but I'm sure he's well aware that unless Johnson's given some official position, it's Sunak he should be talking to.
I wouldn't believe Bojo if he told me today was Monday. Doesn't mean putrid didn't say it. But, the only reason Bojo was so active with Ukraine was he needed to distract from his dire situation at home, the only reason I'd like to see him back.
I personally think Putin probably did say it but not in dead earnest given the pre-war context, but it's now being deliberately misrepresented by Boris.
It's clearly just a PR stunt to get himself back in the headlines. He's making it all about him, it's not even about about UK-Russia relations.
Those at top/running UK have had serious problems with Russian money alright. It's really IMO an issue of utter greed leading on to corruption + a defective moral compass. Bad, but (I admit) it may not be as harmful as sympathy for aspects of pov/worldview of Russia/Putin (as opposing US/NATO/the West) + a resulting unwillingness to support Ukraine that we might have seen had Corbyn been the UK PM at this time.
Roughly on subject, saw interesting story last week about Prigozhin getting a sanction waiver (pre war, note) to move lots of money into the UK. It was to hire law firms, barristers etc. and use the UK court system to wage lawfare on journalists writing about his activities + "Wagner group".
I suppose the people involved will (if they need to sleep) tell themselves "everyone (caveat: with a fat enough wallet) has a human right to the very best of legal representation" to protect their reputation in court in a democracy and so forth. I suppose where there is muck there is brass and for the lawyers the money received has no smell of course.
Wagner Inc: a Russian warlord and his lawyers: https://www.ft.com/content/8c8b0568-cdd1-4529-a4fd-82e57983ddc5
Also:
1. I agree but Boris doesn't do anything for the common good. He's obviously on a crusade to distance himself from future russian money scandals if they get dug up in London. A nice consequence of his utter corruption and ego was help for Ukraine though.
2. Not directly makes no sense. Russian state threats were veiled and murky the first few months. Why the hell would Putin threaten a strike before the invasion he thought would last a week even start.
Boris is a liar and a only fools would believe anything from a conversation we will never get to hear ourselves.
Two things:
And I think Russia has quite a track record on threats generally.
I wouldn't believe a word what Johnson says
There's an air of desperation about the whole thing. Anyone can tell they are a bunch of blowhards, spoofers and wafflers making it up as they go along. You could understand this nonsense being aired in a podcast, but the fact that it is taking place on state television is off the wall.
Havent we seen that before Ukraines last offensive,Russia making gains taking heavy losses,so heavy that they need another mobilization,and so heavy that it weaken their defences.
Russia is just trying to grab enough land again,before Ukraine gets their next batch of heavy weapons,tanks and artillery,then dig in again,or have another mobilization ,and try and go for the whole of Ukraine again.
I am more keen to see the reactions of the russian people if another mobilization is coming
Maybe then they will finally wake up
It actually becomes pretty hilarious with multiple people because their propaganda starts to contradict itself and we see realisations setting in
The propagandists appear to have gone completely bonkers in the last week or so. Every day it's "let's fire nuclear missiles at the US", "let's bomb Polish military bases", "let's sink Estonian ships". They're like a bunch of drunks in a late night bar - how this gibberish can even be aired on state TV is anyone's guess.
The fact that the NATO countries have been convinced to send expensive offensive weapons would lead one to think they must feel there is a decent chance of an effective counter offensive, it might not happen until mid summer but they got those tanks and infantry vehicles for a reason and it's not to retreat at high speed.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/e050b53be62f0ae2404c620976170938.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w9.vanillicon.com/v2/99cb88aba86d6cd761548c5d5bb50f6a.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c635d680d76ce16e490d61f21d7a1353.svg)
