I wonder how this will work out for him
Threadbanned Posters:
Hamsterchops
take everything
road_high
FixdePitchmark
gk5000
It's getting to the "**** or get off the pot" time for the Burkes now. Do they really believe in the hyperbole crap they are peddling or is it all just an act?
We will know if the next few hours.
Id assume that any future earnings would be affected by potential fines building up.
I'd imagine that those fines are there forever until they are paid and would result in some kind of garnishment of any future earnings whether that is from an actual job or from dole payments etc.
That isn’t what I answered though.
Apologies, I meant this is response to one of the posters questioning transgenderism as a whole. I completely support the transgender community, and think Enoch's actions to date have been abhorrent.
It'd be funny if the gardai set up about 30 speedtraps on the road between Multy and the high court JUST in case Enoch suddenly changes his mind and decides to turn up in person
We all need to make compromises in life.
If an LGBTQ+ goes into a pub and the toilet options are M or F they need to pick one and get over it.
If a dwarf goes to a terrace at a rugby game they need to accept that getting a good view won't be as easy as the 6' 6" basketball player beside him.
If the 6' 6" basketball player goes on a plane he needs to accept getting a comfortable seat won't be as easy as the dwarf beside him in the queue.
If a person with allergens goes to a restaurant they need to accept the limitations of the menu.
And likewise if Enoch Burke has certain beliefs he needs to accept that he can't impose them on other people and it's him that must compromise, not everybody else.
Just shows what an ass the legal system in Ireland is. unless he goes for self employment, he will never, ever get a job in Ireland again. Enoch is enoch now.
No , its about something more than that. This article explain it. Are you saying they are wrong?
Burke was suspended with pay following his refusal of a request to recognise a transgender student by their preferred pronouns, they/them.
The article completely omits the verbal abuse of the principal that lead to his dismissal. the article is a disgrace.
Yes - They are wrong.
He was suspended for how he reacted to being asked to recognise a Transgender student in the school , not for his initial refusal to do so.
The article is lazy and inaccurate journalism.
That article is wrong.
He was suspended with pay pending a disciplinary hearing regarding his conduct towards the principal.
Have you got a transcript or something , how do you know what was said?
Last one I promise
115 pages in and still people trying to peddle this nonsense.
This is from the article you posted:
Burke has cited his religious beliefs as the reason for his refusal to comply with the student’s, and the school’s, request.
On several occasions he publicly voiced his objection to the school’s request, on one occasion publicly questioning the principal following a service at the Church of Ireland school.
Subsequently, the school suspended him. He continued to attend the school while suspended, following which the school went to court. He was jailed for failing to obey a court order to stay away from the school.
Following chaotic scenes at a disciplinary hearing at which he and members of his family repeatedly chanted at the school board, he was dismissed in January.
He refused to comply with the request to refer to the student by they/them profiles, but he was not suspended for that, that was the inciting event. His refusal went to the point of repeatedly and publicly challenging the principal about the decision (many reports said he had to be restrained/separated from the principal and refused to follow proper channels to discuss it), which led to being suspended and everything that followed after.
He wasn't suspended for refusing to refer to the student with they-them pronouns. You're quoting one line from the article out of context of the following paragraphs.
So would I! I’d pay Vinnie to do it!
Publicly challenged the principle? So there's video's? I ask because i hadn't the time nor interest to follow the story until now.
By those standards children shouldn't be allowed any medical treatment at all.
Except we allow them to with their parents blessing. And most jurisdictions have provisions for when a child wants one thing but the parents don't. For example a medical treatment that goes against the parents wishes or religion but is essential to the childs health.
Childrens health is an ethical minefield but generally they processes, when applied correctly, work pretty well.
Ah the old "I don't really know much about it so I'm just asking questions" routine.
Questions that just happen to perfectly align with your worldview, as evidenced by your entire posting history on the site..
Sure.
We'll know in an hour or two.
I recon the judge shall let it run to about 80k before committing him to jail again - or whatever else the judge can do - and I'd say all the high court judges are racking their brains on this one.
you were quite happy to accept the article when you thought it supported your point of view. when it is pointed out that it doesn't you suddenly demand more proof. almost like you are not posting in good faith.
Yeah , i actually have a life and porioties , and couldn't care less about Burke , hence why I have no prior posts in this 116 page thread. Feel free to prove me wrong , you won't be able to. But thats just a deflection to the question you seemingly can't answer. Bit strange since you claim to be the authority on the issue.
I don’t have a “dog in the fight” on this issue but I have been attacked on ppl on this thread for passing on info on how locals see the Burke family - apparently they are angry that ppl see the Burke’s in a somewhat positive light??
ppl seem to be very invested in the whole issue. Personally i don’t really care one way or other.
But I will say I admire ppl for standing up for their beliefs and EB is certainly doing that.
Where it ends I don’t know...
nobody cares about proving you wrong. the opinion of someone who doesn't bother to educate themselves on a subject is irrelevant.
it doesn't help that you made ridiculous claims like they do lots of good work locally and that is all verifiable. when asked to verify you just run away.
You quote me non-stop so you obviously care what I think.
not in the slightest. i just like showing you up.
Well, I don't agree with that view and would think people who hold such view to be idiots but I don't like deplatforming anyone if they aren't advocating violence against anyone.
So no video of this abuse exists , despite it being done in public?
LOL. you really do have a very high opinion of yourself. entirely unwarranted.