I wonder how this will work out for him
Threadbanned Posters:
Hamsterchops
take everything
road_high
FixdePitchmark
gk5000
You think a huge majority would no longer refer to "neutral pronouns as a load of horse manure"?
What the largest polls on gender expression in Ireland, over the last four years, have shown is that there isn't a huge majority in favour of anything.
In Ireland and Britain both though, there is a majority against a-là carte gender identity and that legal gender changes in particular should be backed up by medical intervention, Doctors certification and two year minimum of living in the acquired gender.
In America, opposition to ever being able to change your birth assigned gender, stands at 60%...
So, after all, Burke's opinion may reflect something of a majority, or at least a significant cohort, but again, the dismissal was nothing to do with his opinion, it was all to do with his personal conduct.
I wouldn't know, I never watch his show. But going with the Fr Ted theme:
That would be insane. Yeah I know he wants the oxygen of publicity but banning the media from covering this would cause way more harm than good.
The courts need to take this to it's natural conclusion in accordance with our laws, whatever outcome that may be.
The gardai need to ensure the safety of the children and innocent bystanders
It would appear at this stage that Mr Burkes campaign has done wonders for the acceptance of gender neutrality throughout the country.
It has been a total disaster from day 1 of this for the gender ideology movement.
A high profile story like this is the LAST thing they ever would have wanted.
It has been exposed time and again that where we are now in respect of gender fluidity policy has gone on completely uncriticized in the main stream media till now.
Anyone who thinks that hatred of the Burkes is in some way an endorsement and a win for the gender ideology movement has no idea what is actually going on.
What makes this worse for them is that this particularly story involves an adolescent, again the last thing they would have wanted exposed in the media.
Enoch needs to strike while the iron is hot, if he had a media savvy person at his side he could get onto a few celebrity shows and try to convert a few of us sinners.
Seriously though he is an absolute ignorant selfish pig to carry on like he has over something so avoidable. He has shown no concern for his pupils who are still only growing children trying to find their way in the world. I care little about gender stuff but for him to create this fuss over it has now left the young person open to bullying and ridicule by asshóles in his/her peer group. I've laughed away at the fool but his effects on the teen involved show him up for the heartless idiot he is.
As for the vetting, convictions alone don't necessarily prevent someone from teaching. Now I can understand schools/ universities refusing someone because they have convictions but that's mostly due to failing the 'Is he/she a good fit here ? test' because of having the convictions. There are some organisations who employ people to teach who had convictions from their earlier years and have been away from trouble for a length of time. Obviously though sex related convictions are thankfully a no no.
Who commissioned and funded those “largest polls” that you mention?
Looking forward to seeing what happens today.
Why?
Because a couple of 6th years who care about their education might cling film him to a chair and lock him in the supply closet, and that would be hilarious.
Keep fighting for what you believe in Mr Burke
🙄
Just reinforces the mantra that that family are crackpots. So it’s a public service that they are close to being a real danger to the public in general.
The belief being his right to drag Ireland back to the 1950s and control the lives of all of us, particularly on matters sexual.
Do you agree with his views on the intrinsic connection between homosexuality and paedophilia?
How ya now
Lol
Eh, no, it really isn’t.
Sources are willing to provide a comment, but may not be able to do so in an official capacity, or may do so on condition that they are not named. As Burke is not a member of either Union, it is understandable that neither union would want to make an official comment on a situation which does not involve them.
“Union sources” means the reporter asked his brother-in-law teacher who once went to a union branch meeting in 1995.
The reason why the source is unable to comment in an official capacity is because the union has no official view on the matter.
I believe in some of your views, but not all.
Do you understand how that works?
You know who the reporter asked?
I feel sorry for the pupil at the centre of this. I’m surprised that they haven’t looked for a barring order against him. Turning up everyday refusing to leave etc, were it a domestic situation there’d be a barring order and gardai enforcing it quick as a flash.
Do you know who the reporter asked?
Yes, a Union source who didn’t want to be named, it says so in the article, you are saying the story is made up though.
Why are you saying the story is made up, what is your basis for that?
I'm in a union, if a journalist asked me something, I could technically be a "union source", is their point
What’s your understanding of “union source”?
No, if you read the post, he/she said using an unidentified source is usually their way of making shiite up.
What is the basis for that?
Unnamed sources like that are generally not to be trusted 100%.
Pretty certain the Brexit campaign were caught using "unnamed sources" which just turned out to be fearmongering untruths.
If you want to know the union's position, wait for them to have an official position. You could even send them a mail.
I wonder how many days it'll take for the media to stop being outside the school to photograph Burke trying to get in etc. Once that stops, I wonder will Daddy Burke still be so inclined to make the long roadtrip to drop Enoch off at the school to grandstand to the gates with no one there to see.
Another bold statement, so confidential sources are generally not to be trusted 100%? Based on what?
Some info on use of unnamed/confidential sources:
Out of interest Flaneur, as a member of a teachers union, would you have direct knowledge of the unions view on the procedure by which Enoch Bourke was dismissed?
Let’s see what today brings
I'm not a member of a teachers union. You should stop making so many assumptions