I wonder how this will work out for him
Threadbanned Posters:
Hamsterchops
take everything
road_high
FixdePitchmark
gk5000
....there are links to autism and religious fundamentalism, those of us on the spectrum tend towards belief systems of strong moralism and ethics, a lot of the burke family behaviors resemble so, in particular enochs....
What is ridiculous is those still desperately grasping onto the position that Enoch Burke was jailed for refusing to use a trans student's choice of pronoun.
Even a High Court Judge has stated his case has nothing to do with transgenderism. Take it up with them.
As an aside, no one who is asked to use a particular pronoun is being asked to literally believe anything about the other person's gender. All they're being asked for is a courtesy, nothing more, nothing less.
They are very religious which is highly unusual for current day Ireland. However, there are loads of countries where people like them are in the vast majority. They only stand out here because their principals are at odds with most people in the country.
No, I'm not. They are intelligent.
I don't agree with their belief's, or their behavior, neither does most on here thankfully , but they are an incredibly intelligent group of people.
Ridiculous attempt to once again side step the root cause. Contempt of court is the charge, not the reason, which was pretty obvious in my post.
the burkes come across as being seriously emotionally immature, seriously lacking in the understanding of the emotional needs of others, in particular kids, theyre clearly intellectually intelligent, but theres something seriously lacking in the emotional department, wouldnt surprise me if there is a high concertation of autism in the family....
You are confusing acquired knowledge with intelligence.
But at the heart of this.... whether you like to admit it or not...
Burke was not jailed for "not conforming" to the request to use a trans student's preferred pronouns.
He was jailed for contempt of court as a consequence of his repeatedly breaking a High court order, ordering him to stay away from the school while on suspension.
A high court order made on him 100% as a consequence of his own behaviour in accosting the Principal at a public event.
Burke did not have to accost the Principal at a public event to make his objections known to her. There is a time and place for him to make his objections known. But he did what he did, and that's what led to his suspension, and what led him to where he is where he is today.
Silly that at this stage, that some are still trying to make his imprisonment about transgenderism and not about his behaviour, and that it still needs to be repeated, so frequently.
There is no jail penalty for misgendering or not using someone's preferred pronouns. If he had simply refused to comply with the request, he would not have ended up in a jail cell.
Most people, even if they don't understand or think being non binary is a bit silly, will have enough basic respect for someone to refer to them as whatever that person desires and get on with their lives. And even most that do have a major problem on the level that Burke does(if that's possible), wouldn't fancy making themselves unemployable in their profession.
They could just call them by their name. Or in the case of Burke and the minor he's decided to use to make a point in the most public of ways, he wouldn't have to call that person anything, as he wasn't the students teacher and from what I've read, never had any contact with the person.
Show me where I have defended them
The very next line. 😂
A robust exchange of views is not violence
Using terms like “creep”, “chomping around” “danger to children” “dragged away”, “violent” “bully” without merit, it could well be construed as online bullying by some
"Some" being fans of this family.
Show me where I have defended them. Pointing out that what you are posting is wrong, is not defending them.
A robust exchange of views is not violence, there is no doubt the setting was inappropriate. The allegation relating to that exchange will be dealt with at the Disciplinary Hearing, which of course is the correct forum. He was wrong to do what he did, where he did. To categorise that as violence is to do a disservice to people who suffer actual violence.
That is not defending Burke, it is disagreeing with you, there is a difference.
Using terms like “creep”, “thumping”, “chomping around” “danger to children” “dragged away”, “violent” “bully” without merit, it could well be construed as a form of online bullying by some.
Your two questions is a classic example of defending him.
Read back through your posts, particularly where you accused me of being worst them in.
The question about violence has been answered by me personally several times and several times more by other posters, considering you are one of the more active members on this thread you already know the answer.
It's bad faith posting.
But again.
Chasing a woman around in a threatening manner to the point where people have to step in to stop you is violent behaviour.
Coupled with his violent outbursts in court and all sorts of conspiracy claims and his beyond erratic behaviour.
All traits of an extremely low grade bully.
That is simply incorrect. The Kildare Place Society was set up in 1811 as one of the first, the first? organised educational bodies. Initially it was clearly non denominational and open to children of all faiths. It was however religious in that the bible, common to Christian faiths, was to be read in school without further interpretation.
It was the likes of Archbishop McHale who refused to allow Catholic children to go to the likes of Kildare Place schools and insisted in setting up segregated educational for Catholic children. He had rival schools set up.
But this is where we are now and whilst the student in question has a right to be called by what name as they wish, Burke also has rights not to be discriminated against due to his religious beliefs. Two competing sets of 'rights' and that's the nub of this issue.
Have I defended them?
See there you go again, how has he been violent?
Well you are on here again defending them, I mean it's hardly subtle, so the question was pertinent.
As for commonalities - oh yes you are more worried about me than an erratic violent individual who hangs around all day in a school corridor he is banned from. 😂
I detest bullies, they need to be called out for what they are. I think any reasonable person would agree with that.
This is like one of those posters who says “you must be a Garda or an Estate Agent” or whatever topic is being discussed, just because I don’t share your view.
I think what Burke did was wrong, I think he is misguided in taking the approach he is, the Disciplinary Hearing is the correct forum to dispute the allegations, I think their family’s zealous behaviour damages them, making them at this stage virtually unemployable. But I don’t share your views, and see commonalities between the way you refer to them, and the way they refer to others that don’t agree with them.
Same sex marriage was an issue for a tiny minority. It still brought enough attention and votes to make it a reality. Transgenderism (which is directly related to the reason Burke was in prison...like to admit it or not) is something in which a tiny minority of people go through, but it is still broadly pasted across the headlines and causing major problems in womens sports.
Perhaps your bias is the reason you say most people don't give a shite about what is going on about Enoch Burke, but you are very wrong and the story will only gain more traction. Those who strip it down to "he disobeyed a court order and that's why he is in jail" are side stepping the reasons behind it, which Burke has on multiple occasions attested to.
At the heart of all this, is a minority trying to put words into everyones mouths. Don't try to force others to call you something you are not. A man can believe he is a woman and while I find the idea to be strange at best, I'm OK to let people believe about themselves what they want as long as I am left to believe what I believe....that the person is still a biological man and this can't be changed. When that belief is forced down someone elses throat with the penalty of jail for not conforming, then we really do have an issue.
I commend Burke for sticking to his beliefs and standing up against the nonsense he was told to abide by. Most people would have crumbled and given in at the first hurdle and grumbled away as they walked down the steps of the courthouse.
I already explained to you the difference between academic ability and intelligence.
And yes if the claim is they are one of most intelligent families in Ireland, than yes that would be absolute intelligence.
I see no evidence of that, quite the opposite really.
Why are you a fan of this horrible family?
Only you mentioned absolute intelligence, you asked an earlier poster to support his/her assertion that they must be one of the most intelligent families in Ireland, certainly their academic achievements lend weight to that claim.
You can be intelligent and not have a 1st class honours degree in maths or physics, economics or law, but can you achieve those first class honours without intelligence?
Only to you, you can’t achieve first class honours and be “dim”.
Why not? You are naively equating absolute intelligence with ones academic ability, which of course has varying factors involved to reach that level, money, discipline, structure.
Some of the most intelligent people I know and have known never had the luxury or fortune to go to college, some didn't even do their leaving.
But again the fact remains, from what I have seen of them they are pretty fúcking thick to be honest at even the most rudimentary level.
"The measure of intelligence is the ability to change" (Einstein)
Only to you, you can’t achieve first class honours and be “dim”. Whether they are socially inept is a different matter entirely.
It's an indication of academic ability. Intelligence would be a far wider spectrum.
But like I said, the vocals ones come across quite dim.
They are certainly socially retarded, which I imagine stems from their up bringing more so than anything else.
From reading about them, they were all home schooled, firstly by their mother, then by the older siblings helping out.
As others have said, they seem to lack common sense and awareness of others, I’m not psychologist obviously, but you have to wonder is that due to being kept out of contact with other kids during their formative school years.
Sorry, I ninja edited my post as you were posting.
I can’t tell if you have any third level education, but achieving first class honours is not easy, for every member of the family who has finished third level so far to achieve first class honours must put them near the top of any analysis of family achievements in academia. Is that an indication of intelligence? You would have to think so, even though it doesn’t carry the same peer reviewed acceptance as Irelands Fittest Family TV show.
That's very impressive, shame they (at least the two we know about) are not smart.
Were they home schooled in their early years, do you know?
And where does it state They are one of the most intelligent families in the country
They are one of the most intelligent families in the country
I mean that's why I asked the question of the person who made the claim.
I'm aware of Irelands Fittest Family, is there a similar competition for intelligence?
From what I can see the vocal ones are quite dim.
But that is merely because most are Catholic, and if you don’t like the religion or views it is “indoctrination”
50 years before the State, we all had Protestant schools which were most certainly involuntary, and involved actual indoctrination on the part of the Britain and its empire
You say, only Catholic in some areas, but what about those with CoI, but have no Baptist or Methodist school
Recently, we have multi-demoninational, merely because there is a market for them
Hitchens himself was full of illusions, which he did not keep quiet
His fanboys, merely, pseudo intellectuals who fail to realise he was a right wing British ignorant nationalist and hypocritical bigot
(but had an accent, so clearly an “intellectual”)
What is quite amazing is the lengths people will go to blame “Catholics” for things
It is always “Catholic indoctrination”, “Ring wing Catholic”, “Catholic fanatics”, but Burke and his ilk are never referred to as Protestants
Internet atheists, along with most media, clearly take their views from Britain in this stance, rooted in sectarianism and xenophobia, rather than logic
The Burke children are known for their academic success.[2][1][3] Isaac has a PhD in mathematics, and Kezia has won awards for a paper she wrote on mathematics and physics.[2] Enoch also holds two bachelor's degrees (one in theological studies, the other in history and politics) as well as a master's degree in education.[4] Josiah holds an MSc in economic history.[2] Simeon won the Mayo School's Debating Competition alongside his brother Elijah,[5] and represented the National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG) at the final of The Irish TimesDebating Competition in 2020.[6] All of the siblings who have completed an undergraduate degree received a first-class honours.[1]
I think most would acknowledge that their level of intelligence may be higher than most. Their academic achievements certainly put them in the highest percentile with all achieving first class honours so far.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w6.vanillicon.com/v2/62877c35768f143f69acd7bb6cd43f3c.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/v2/08231869fd786c2459f2d35b207b4d26.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wa.vanillicon.com/v2/a46418388544fe9f8f6352b57fb2f921.svg)
