You've been looking in the wrong direction, the dangers are coming from the right.

Hi and welcome to the thread.

Go ahead and join the group of people over there who think the only alternative to right wing philosophies fcuking everyone over, is communism.

I'm pretty sure not everyone could have done this by mistake in a thread where zero posts call for communism so I assume it's just using the same tactics their preffered political groupset use despite no evidence of such calls being made.

So much for original thought.

P.S. the edit button is hidden behind the ellipses in the top right of the post.

The man tweeting this was appointed a senior White House Advisor by the last President.

Even Bolsonaro doesn't agree.

How anyone could look at Bannon and think that he is interested in Democracy absolutely astounds me.

He literally said it. $8 a month or your content will not be prioritized and you'll be burdened with ads and not have the ability to post longer content etc. He is demanding people pay for their time on the soap box. Totally fine if that's the business strategy he wants to take, but totally not free the free speech that he and his fan group have been going on about.

Do you think every thread that is started here is done from a place of bias, or just those you disagree with. I feel I've more than explained the logic behind my position with clear and obvious examples from the real world all around us to back it up. Bias is taking a position without such evidence.

We've had people target me (as you have done), talk about history, talk about extremism and the usual 'both sides blah blah blah' but virtually no one has challenged the core message that most of the prominent situations negatively impacting people today are the outcome of the policies of right wing individuals, governments, media, ideologues. And the fact that lots of people on here continue to be focused on getting riled up about 'Liberal / Left wing' topics that are comparatively inconsequential is also very evident.

He may have bitten off more than he can chew on this one. It's all very public and interactions like the one with Stephen Kin yesterday will have those who sign advertising cheques feeling very nervous. Didn't come off at all like someone who had a defined strategy. Time will tell.

• There was more than enough demonstrable evidence to support Hillary's claims as she made them.
• She conceded the election to Donald the night of it, or early next morning.
• She, nor the Democrats didn't seek to prevent Trump being inaugurated by storming the capitol.
• She, nor the Democrats didn't bring over 60 cases to various courts looking to have the results overturned.
• She, nor the Democrats didn't call election officials begging them to 'find' votes.

These two situations are not remotely the same no matter how strongly you look to 'Both Sides' them.