nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Can we dispose of nuclear waste in outer space?

Dinarius

Serious question.

With so much talk focused on the need for countries like Ireland to reconsider nuclear power and, in particular, small modular nuclear reactors; but, with the ever present question of waste disposal, I’m asking…

Is disposal of nuclear waste in space viable?

Thanks.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Glaceon

Rockets can and do fail. The failure of a rocket carrying nuclear waste could be very significant.

SuperBowserWorld

I remember one of the Superman movies where superman flies all the nuclear warheads into space, fires them at the sun and creates this evil superman. Might have been superman 4.

But, back to real life ...

I think it's too risky, right now, with current rocket technology to do this, as it could all blow up in the atmosphere. But maybe in the future when rockets are more reliable ?

corner of hells

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058266599/can-we-dispose-of-nuclear-waste-in-outer-space

Yes , but you've to stay up there with waste , cause it was your idea.

Sorta like Guardian of the Waste.

Wanderer78

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119718204#Comment_119718204

definitely a job for the man in his underpants

o1s1n

**** rockets, what we'd need is a space elevator to a space station and then to move it on from there.

[Deleted User]

Well, you could... but:

Rocket blows up and scatters nuclear waste across a huge area causing massive contamination and rendering the place uninhabitable.
It's obscenely expensive to launch rockets into space and also very environmentally damaging. It's not something you could really do on a routine basis for waste management.
Unless you're going VERY far out into space, the waste would likely end up in orbit.

[Deleted User]

Sure why not? We've screwed up our own planet so we might as well see what other parts of the universe we can screw up now.

[Deleted User]

I reckon a really, really big trebuchet aimed at the moon is all we'd need.

cnocbui

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058266599/can-we-dispose-of-nuclear-waste-in-outer-space

No need. All levels of nuclear wast can be stabilised by incorporating them in what amounts to a synthetic rock which has a similar chemical composition to natural rocks, some of which have remained stable for over 2 billion years. The process is called Synroc. It's used at sellafield, Argone national laboratory in the US and in Australia.

If nuclear energy were the only source of electricity that powered your entire life, all of the nuclear waste generated from that could be contained in a piece of Synroc the size of a can of soup.

Deep below the earths surface, in many places, are thick layers of salt formed from evaporating oceans, hundreds of millions of years ago. These layers of salt are utterly impermeable to anything, even hydrogen, whose molecules are so small that they can pass through many solids under pressure. Some of these layers of salt have remained stable for 300 million years.

It would be quite easy to deposit nuclear waste in the form of Synroc, in such salt deposits several km below the surface. Such waste would be safely dealt with for probably hundreds of millions of years. The Synroc itself might be stable for billions of years, like the rock it copies.

SuperBowserWorld

We could get the Irish government to cover all loss and damage worldwide due to an accident.

They are very good at using our money to bailout everyone else except us.

😝😝😝

Larbre34

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119718259#Comment_119718259

Ah give over you, ya misery. We'd still be in the cave if it were up to you.

But no, rockets are too unreliable yet for dangerous and toxic payloads.

If a safer system is developed though, shooting waste of any sort into deep space is definitely worth consideration.

corner of hells

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119718261#Comment_119718261

Sounds good , but we'd have to fire it at night , might cost a bit more with the overtime.

[Deleted User]

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119718312#Comment_119718312

Sorry for suggesting that we should be vaguely socially responsible with the limited resources on the planet that keeps us alive.

Mayor Quimby level thinking is obviously alive and well.

El Tarangu

Why complicate matters? Just keep in a big swimming pool while it is still really radioactive, and then move to a big cask like we do currently.

I think people really overestimate how little space we actually need to store nuclear waste.

igCorcaigh

There is nothing wrong with nuclear waste. It's packed in to little concrete constructions, and has never harmed anyone. Chemical waste or the burning of combustibles though, another story.

Quantum Erasure

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119718261#Comment_119718261

or just spin it really really fast and then let go

Larbre34

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119718618#Comment_119718618

You're not, youre suggesting we shouldn't pollute space, which is irrelevant, as space is one big radiation pit anyway and so nothing humans could send up there could make it any more hostile.

Apology accepted anyway.

[Deleted User]

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119719728#Comment_119719728

Like I said, Mayor Quimby would be proud

https://cce.ucdavis.edu/news/pollution-space-damage-we-cause

Quantum Erasure

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119719738#Comment_119719738

just launch it further, it'll be grand...

Ger Roe

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119719783#Comment_119719783

Be careful what you wish for.

Space 1999 had an episode called 'Voyager's Return' where a nuclear powered earth launched probe had travelled through the universe spreading deadly radiation in its aftermath, from its Queller Drive engine. It caused the Chief Justifier of the Worlds of Sidon, to track down Moonbase Alpha and seek to destroy it, in revenge for the millions of deaths that Voyager had caused on two worlds that it had passed.

Moonbase Alpha was located on our moon, itself wandering aimlessly through space because it was blasted from orbit following a nuclear waste dump explosion.

It's all true : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager%27s_Return

Akrasia

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119718220#Comment_119718220

You'd need him doing it as a full time job. There's a lot of nuclear waste out there and its also surprisingly hard to actually get something to crash into the sun. You can't just throw it at the sun because it carries the earth's orbital velocity and it would miss and end up in a highly eccentric orbit that could end up anywhere

Superman would need to take a few maths classes and swot up on orbital dynamics

cnocbui

I think the nuclear waste thing could in the future turn out to be almost amusing, when our descendents find themselves having a vital use for it: 'why did those idiot ancestors of ours make this precious stuff so hard to get to? We've been digging for six months and we're only half way there!'

dxhound2005

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119718763#Comment_119718763

If the people doing the estimate only looked at Switzerland, then that could be true. But even a small storage area going faulty, could be a disaster for millions of people.

How much nuclear waste is in the world right now?

Image result for how much nuclear waste in the world

In brief. More than a quarter million metric tons of highly radioactive waste sits in storage near nuclear power plants and weapons production facilities worldwide, with over 90,000 metric tons in the US alone.30 Mar 2020

beachhead

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058266599/can-we-dispose-of-nuclear-waste-in-outer-space

There are supposedly international treaties that ban disposal of any waste in the earth's atmosphere.Where are you proposing the waste be jettisoned to?

cnocbui

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119720824#Comment_119720824

Not a single person has died as as a result of nuclear waste storage. Using hyperbole is just stupid. Planes can crash killing lots of people, non nuclear industrial accidents kill thousands every year. Gas explosions have killed many thousands of people and yet we will continue to put up with the risks associated with all these.

Nuclear waste is benign compared to many other things.

Ubbquittious

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119718229#Comment_119718229

Ding...

Dohhhhs Opening!

Capt'n Midnight

Cosmos 954 was a Russian satellite with a BES-5 nuclear reactors fuelled by uranium-235. It got splatted across the landscape of Canada. https://www.dianuke.org/cosmos-954-nuclear-powered-satellite-that-fell-from-space/ Nuclear waste falling from space is something that's already happened.

There's different grades of nuclear waste. The really nasty stuff that has to be kept in cooling ponds. Probably the easiest to deal with in the sense that it's got a short half life so will mostly decay within living memory.

The very low grade stuff they discharge into the environment link BNFL and the Irish Sea.

That leaves the medium and low grades that currently isn't put into forever dumps because no one has built a proper one yet. SpaceX are charging 10's of millions per rocket. You could get several m3 of nuclear waste into low earth orbit. Or a lot less into a higher orbit where it wouldn't come back so soon. To launch it beyond earth's orbit you would would need bigger rockets or reduce the payload to small amounts.

Ray Palmer

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119722677#Comment_119722677

All the people who died dealing with Chernobyl say differently. Once the place had blown everything they were handling was waste. Loads of people dying of cancers by leaking waste sites doesn't happen according to you.

You like to say there is a solution but it isn't in use to deal with waste and as such unproven.

cnocbui

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119724941#Comment_119724941

Even taking chernobyl into account, the attributable deaths for nuclear energy are miniscule and vastly les than for almost every other source of energy production. The figures are about the same as for wind and solar, and chernobyl's aftermath was not nuclear waste.

As for your other false claim:

Synroc for Plutonium Disposal...A pyrochlore-rich titanate ceramic has been chosenby the US DOE for excess weapons Pu immobilisation in the USA... The Australian Nuclear Science and TechnologyOrganisation (ANSTO) has been developingtitanate ceramic wasteforms since 1980 through itssynroc program. ANSTO is participating with theLawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL).the lead laboratory on plutonium immobilisation forthe US DOE office of Fissile Materials Disposition(MD). Other members of the team are ArgonneNational Laboratory, Pacific Northwest NationalLaboratory and the Westinghouse Savannah RiverCompany Technology Center. The US DOE hasexpressed a preference for siting the immobilisationfacility at the Savannah River site and current plansenvisage that the facility would be fully operationalby 2006/7

https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/31/033/31033868.pdf

An Australian process for disposing of nuclear waste has emerged as a front runner for cleaning up atomic power plants and obsolete warheads.

The Synroc, or synthetic rock process, was invented by the late Australian nuclear physicist Ted Ringwood in 1978.

This month, after years of low budget and low key refinement, it won a multimillion dollar "demonstration" contract to eliminate 5 tonnes of plutonium contaminated waste at British Nuclear Fuel's Sellafield plant, on the northwest coast of England.

https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2005/04/22/2003251453

And in Australia, they built a nuclear medicine facility that produces radio isotopes for use in Australian hospitals that also includes a synroc processing section that takes all of Australia's nuclear waste and transforms it into synroc:

Looks pretty real for something that doesn't exist.

B.A._Baracus

What happens when our nuclear waste lands on blurgon 5 and the blurgons start a war with us?

Didn't think about that did you Mr op!