What has Sean Quinn or anyone else got to do with the story about a SF TD?
Anyway, carry on
Good catch there at the end
Hopefully sinn fein will use this to ban limited liability and the practice of businessmen hiding behind companies to bankrupt subbies and relaunch under new name......
seriously need to restrectch the bankruptcy laws back to minimum 10 years esp with Brexit making bankruptcy holidays near impossible
utter rotten rotten cnuts in this country,destroying lives and communities and hiding behind company law to do so
Not in the case of a limited company, the directors are the trustees.
An incomprehensible beneficiary of limited liability (which likely Kenny is here).....if your unable/don't understand the bigger picture,there's not much I can do for yous
Do you support ending limited liability and strengthing our bankruptcy laws,on back of this case?
Are you saying that he was party to the decision to grant his business this loan - because this is the critical issue
Certainly seems to be insinuating this, potentially a rather huge issue as regards liable for boards.ie I'd believe
Nice little attempt to dance on head of a pin,spinning your post to deflect to something else....interesting to see how this plays out
Yes, but you think nothing strange about a TD approving a personal loan for himself from taxpayers money.
Can't see how above can be misinterpreted tbh
@Brendan Bendar cat got your tongue Brenda?
How can ban people from starting up companies? What sort of ridiculous statement is that?
Every topic about SF seems to be shut down with claims of defamation.
Why are you talking about limited liability?
Yea, looks a bit dodgy (if inaccurate) alright
Any comment on here recently which shines SF in a bad light is reported straight away as defamation.
Bit pathetic the same people firing up all sort of accusations on the government thread
Double standard
Nowhere did I say ban anyone from starting up companies....you seem completely unable to undertake basic comprehension,with all due respect,it's doubtful you can therefore grasp concept of elimination of limited liability
Really?
If I look the big discussions in the media has nothing to do with SF. Most seem to be about replacing Pascal or not
Also about help for people during the energy crisis....not a mention of SF.
If you say so :-)
I thought it was just me
Sorry, the fake account on Twitter shared something does not mean anyone else cares!!!
I am sure I explained this to you before?
That was lucky both of you could agree with each other
We had a lot of concern on the internet that two SF supporters might disagree on a topic but all is right in the World.
You mentioned tranction on social media 🤷♂️
As we all know that traction is just all the fake mob accounts. We have had this discussion so no need to go over old ground 👍👌
Also interesting how the SF posters are so desperate to link back to traction with teh online mob. That mob backfired two years ago for SF, they just haven’t copped on yet
Nope, don’t support FG
Fun watching you trying and failing again to try make the online mob relevant 😂😂😂
This is the SF thread, for some reason you are obsessed with FG and want to discuss them instead of SF?
Do you not want to discuss the SF person and the loans?
You should be well aware of the problem of fake accounts on Twitter
As per my point, a load of fake accounts on Twitter sharing something does not make it relevant which is what the other poster is desperately trying to say
SHare us one of your articles?
So much for "change", SF just copying what the other parties have done.
Of course the blame for corruption in SF is the other parties. Not sure many are going to agree with that finger pointing.
This website allows anonymous accounts, so what you're essentially doing is asking an anonymous account holder to share with you some of his or her journalism articles that would easily reveal their identity, and I think you should cease with such requests.
The person said the article had no name against it, so how would they reveal their identity?
Plus they have already confirmed they are running multiple identities online for their work
The poster has mentioned multiple times across thread about been a hack, journalist etc, reasonable question to ask to share some of these articles. If the poster is so concerned about their identity why constantly mention it?
They can always just say no
Essentially pushing for a poster to doX emselves and provide free content just for yous.....have you lost the plot?
🤣
I asked them to share an article. I am sure they are able to respond and say no
As a journalist I would of thought they would be more than happy to share articles for people to read, isn't that the point of been a journalist?
Come off it, you're so transparent it's like your wearing clingfilm overalls.
Ask poster to share some of his or her work that could ultimately lead to revealing their identity.
Poster most likely declines such a request for anonymity concerns.
You'll take some kind of faux moral high ground/raise faux concerns on the posters professional life. Maybe @Beasty could confirm such requests are not reasonable or permitted.
So that's a yes then?
I asked a question, if the person want to say no they can say no.
You seem to be getting very upset over soemthing that has nothing to do with you
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/c6e76a2e0d85c3808d93c2f75a0c528d.svg)
