You said they didnt hit s..t,maybe learn to write so people understand you instead
Blitzkrieg
In 8 minutes or so if you go full auto belt dumps before you wreck a barrel,I believe the H3 variant has twice the rate of fire and pretty much only used in aircraft doors.
Ukrainian aviation conducted 20 air strikes, shot down Ka-52 helicopter, - General Staff of Armed Forces of Ukraine says in the morning report
Its not how I was trained when using the .50 cal. those barrels cannot sustain a long burst of fire before overheating the barrel and wearing out the bore resulting in the barrel having to be exchanged, You can lay down suppresing fire in controlled bursts as well
Except the video is staged. You can see from the aerial view that all they did was drive the BMP from one Mi-26 to another.
There are no reinforcements. Steiner will not be attacking.
CGIing then into a video take a lot less training. Looks like it's out of a game TBH.
Be great if the had A-10's but I seriously doubt it.
They have less than 40 of those can't imagine what will happen if they start falling out of the skies
Correct and correct ,
Some of these Ukrainians have a little to much free time
Russia is using Mi-26 helicopters to bring reinforcements to Izyum and Kupyansk.
Yes, and the original post I replied to made claims of recoil control and accurate fire. Maybe try reading before you deign to proffer an opinion
If Kupyansk falls today I’m going getting plastered on vodka 🤣
News of the setbacks is starting to seep through to the Russian TV propaganda shows, including Solovyov and Skabayeva's ones. Anyone watching can be under no doubt that the current situation in Ukraine is 'challenging' for the regime.
Someone doing a genocide
Not sure you do,supressive fire is not about accuracy,its about making the enemy keep their heads down while boots on the ground moves forward
There were statements by their military that they DO have pilots trained on A10s and F16s and that was few months ago
Now if at some stage Ukraine actually received/got sold them, now that’s another game changer
tho from what I read the main contender is the Swedish Gripen for its capabilities
* emphasis on if
I'd say I'm pretty familiar with it. I was address the other posters claim of accuracy.
Ah, it is... it looked off the first few times I saw it, but when you raised doubts I looked back again and found a jerky bit. Feckers!
Seriously? Christ it's very hard to tell what is real or propaganda. We'd a poster earlier stick up a post about baby formula being laced with poison by the Russians also. I suppose everything has to be questioned
The cloud pattern looks very similar to the one taken yesterday at Kupiansk so that part of the vid stacks up. But Ukraine don't have any A-10s. Have they been superimposed on the vid to make the Russians think they've got them? I still don't think the Ukrainian's have the uncontested airspace around there that would allow them to be used. And where would they have gotten them from?
Looks CGI'ed to me, plus I'm pretty sure the Ukrainians don't have any A10's.
Speculated about for a long time but if accurate and not some training footage from somewhere in the west this is a true game changer.
Well that looks fake
At this rate it looks like the Ukrainians aren't going to have enough flags to keep up with demand for liberated towns and villages 😃
I didn't know Ukraine had A-10s. I also thought that the pilot training time and need for absolute air superiority meant they weren't suitable.
https://www.businessinsider.com/why-a10-isnt-right-jet-for-war-ukraine-is-fighting-2022-7?r=US&IR=T
CNN: Ukraine’s military raises Ukrainian flag in Shevchenkove, Kharkiv Oblast.
If these are able to get close to Russian combat positions without being molested by Russian fighters it's going to be a very bad day at the office for Vlad.
Fake news folks. Cannot delete link.
Rumours of them training on the A10, but this is not it.
Mod - Not sure how we started talking about cattle theft in rural Ireland but lets leave it there and get back on topic please
Here you go comrade @EOQRTL , from Russian source
Do you care to point out where these “promises” are in paper?
Because there are promises to protect Ukraine signed by Russia and promises at UN to not invade other countries
What do you make of Vladimir Putin in an infamous public speech outlining his plans of imperial conquest of all the lands he considers “Russian” (half of Europe if you look at 19th century maps) completely demolishing your “but but NATO” argument