If Waters wants to get a true picture of the situation he has to go back hundreds of years. Russia is the aggressor. Even nato expansion - while questionable - is an excuse for invasion.
And yet the press has been operating mostly free to criticize the governments over the last 8 + year's, they did clamp down on prorussia outlets and rightly so ,
Free press and freedom are not binary measures but a scale on which Russia continually ranks near the very bottom and falling
Hence you trying to draw equivalence with Ukraine which is mid level rankings and climbing is so laughable in this debate
Btw
To the point, we have extensive intervention & assistance from European states and USA etc. Who all have military and economic experts monitoring the news. Now they could be filtering Ukrainian news output as well and slanting it certain ways to suit. But there's a lot more oversight of the info coming from Ukraine.
Whereas in the case of the Russian state and Russian news outlets, any sane person can see that it's impossible to believe any information from those sources. Bare faced liars. And nothing new in this, I tuned into RT several years ago and just laughed at the spiel they were feeding on world events.
Apparently the EU is stealing all the world's grain!
Russian army semi-colonel was captured by Ukrainian military in Kharkiv region
He's completely rattled ,
I'm sure the grains being transported and switched to Russian vessels are feeding the poorest countries
Read the tweet again, the Kyiv Independent is not the source.
The figures are published by the Armed forces of Ukraine.
Are they accurate, nobody knows but many of the equipment losses can be independently verified.
Of course there's propaganda from both sides, but all it takes is some common sense.
If RT is saying X & Y village has been liberated by Ukraine, there's absolutely no reason for them to lie about that.
You could assume then that possibly Z village was liberated also or they potentially have worse loses then they admit.
You had the video a few days ago about a Ukrainian amphibious assault going wrong. Many on here noted the lack of blood, faces obscured, no damage nearby and saying the video looked staged. Low and behold it was staged. Sensible people using their noggin to make an informed decision.
Yeah, between this and finally coming clean on Nordstream it's all closing in on him. Apart from the potential Kherson outcome the oil embargo is next big squeeze on them.
I'm trying to change the system from within - Manhattan's next !!!!
Zelenskyy has a house in France: slaughter the innocents.
Says it all really.
Yep. There's 50,000 Russian lads in the ground who might disagree.
He's completely lost the plot, well that's if he ever had a grasp on reality which i highly doubt.
Russia will eventually end up like North Korea or at least very close to that if he continues on the present path. Unfortunately we are going to face some very severe pain here in Europe over the next several years because of this obnoxious asshat.
I'm asking for a friend has the invasion started yet ...
😂😂😂😂
I'd agree that the Kyiv Independent is clearly not going to be entirely impartial but for the record can you state what media you do trust?
Kharkiv
As mentioned previously, they have been showing the numbers since the early days.
I'll take it that you are new to the thread, so I'll give you slack.
Kyiv independent get their numbers from the military. In the early weeks of the war, people were wondering if the figures were true. A lot of people went through the numbers and verified that the numbers were very realistic and could be trusted as a guide. This is going back to week 1 and 2.
The numbers are not exact but they are in range of good accuracy.
Even if the numbers were half true it these would be significant losses for the Russian army. I expect that they are at least between the two. Now we know the Russians have poor musical backup. So allowing for a 3-1 ratio rather than 5+ to 1 by most modern armies it means that probably half the invasion force is out of action.
Add captured troops and they may have less than 100 k holding the lines. These would be mostly poorly trained conscripts. If they have added to the force it with poorly trained conscripts.
If the UA's numbers are correct this is not sustainable for Russia
Invaded with 150,000 , which 50,000 dead and presumably a similar figure of at least 40,000 injured or Incapacitated,it doesn't look like they have 100,000 holding the line,add they have lost an average of 53 tanks for every week of the war ,not including other vehicles and aircraft.
No modern army can sustain such losses without weaking the defense of their own country
Probably a Lieutenant-Colonel in charge of a Russian battlegroup
I know to be careful with Twitter and Reddit, etc
But there seems to be a lot of good news around Kharkiv,
Are the Russians regrouping for a new defensive line or are we looking at a defensive collapse in the North?
Looks like the Ukranian army will be celebrating Christmas in Sevastopol
But but but.
Russia are going to win so Ukraine should just surrender!!!!!
Something has needed to be done about Hungary for years. Orban never stops complaining about the eu but is happy to take the cash. Last week he was speaking at one of those nut job right wing conferences in America. He’s in bed with Putin.
He's safe in Hungary and he can talk as much nonsense as he likes but the EU have his number now. He's not actually getting the EU cash, not without serious strings about the impartiality of the legal system and press freedom. There were also issues with where that money was going, to cronies and the like.
Strange how none of the peaceniks are protesting North Korea prolonging the war by supplying Russia..
Yes, there will be pain , BUT it will be worth it
Such fake news, anyone can see that it's made in 64, not 65 as this fake account says.
Before the start of the war EU dependency on Russia gas was 40%. 9% today. Norway providing more gas today than Russia.