That's the thing, you won't hear them
Once again NIST lied to the public and said if an explosive detonated a column, people blocks away would hear a loud noise. This video doesn't exist in the world of fantasy, and that loud bang never happened.
This video from CBS is for people who notice reality. It's loud enough to be an explosion. The reporter who's blocks away picks up the bang way off in the distance. That left side of the building started to collapse right after the bang.
Regarding nanothermite, it's only found in dust from the collapse of the twin towers. It seems like the brought down seven matches implosion more. Dropped and panacked floors, came down,
They ignored the person who placed the trades was a banker and former deputy head of the CIA. Because of his background, they said he had no terrorist ties, so the investigation was dropped. In a normal world, bets on airlines dropping weeks before 9/11 would be investigated, but after 9/11, investigations like this would look bad.
And you're back again. You claimed "Nazis" were part of 9/11. Which "Nazis" and what did they do?
Apple hits Einsteins head? Is this another conspiracy theory 😁
I wouldn't call them conspiracy theories anymore. I'd just suggest that sometimes the difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth is time.
Ivermectin for instance. They shut down any discussion about it but yet they're attempting to bring out new covid jabs which weren't even put though human trials.
But ivermectin has been around for years, but the debunkers and people with vested interests call it horse dewormer, and they'll use anything else at this level of ignorance to gallop their drug's to the finishing line .
So to cut down on words….you don’t like the term “conspiracy theory” as your beliefs would make you a conspiracy theorist, and you wouldn’t like to be associated with all levels of insane beliefs.
Calling ivermectin a horse wormer is accurate. Would you not prefer people to be accurate with information, or do you prefer conspiracy theorist lies?
Do you have evidence that ivermectin is safe and effective for humans to use for covid?
Ivermectin was as effective as the vaccines to be honest, that's the irony of my post.
They're both just snake oil, one's a synthetic immune stimulant,the others a horse dewormer.
You've been tangoed , and you're ok with a fast track vaccine that hasn't been put through the proper safety tests . Yep you're a conspiracy theorist Tao.
When the truth comes out, you'll still be screaming that you're right.
Well what they meant to say was, and you're reading it all wrong, can you not understand science etc you twist everything into sh1t
I usually don't like debating with individuals who're sealioning like you do.
Because it's like debating timelines with creationists, absolutely futile. And you're like a creationist.
The goalposts moved on Epstein many times. Initially it was conspiracy that many famous people knew him and associated with him. Then that they knew him but didn't avail of his "services" (Prince Andrew photographic evidence, Bill Gates email about a late night with a mother and daughter). Now it's that he committed "suicide". Yeah right - He committed suicide in the same way that Russian oil baron fell off the top floor of the hospital he was in.
Most conspiracy theories are nonsense, but this one isn't.
I'd a very skeptical person. There are people out there that are what can only be described as mentally ill with a platform. Groups in the US calling the school shootings and church shootings a hoax, calling the families "crisis actors" Absolute madness.
I think most conspiracy theories are nonsense but calling something a conspiracy theory is also a great way to discredit something and shut it down.
These people think almost everyone they meet are part of a grand conspiracy against them and are stalking them.
If I was forced to pick one conspiracy theory that I thought might have some truth to it, I'd pick the moon landing. After watching a few videos on it with an open mind they definitely make some great arguments.
There's a lot of nonsense conspiracies theories out there. But I fear for a lot of dumbunkers too are a bit nuts
They know they're probably right, but they hang in there tooth and nail and still discuss the subject matter over and over, they seem to obsessively enjoy the roll in the ****.
And online self proclaimed debunkers are unable to ignore a conspiracy and let it go.
Observing their track record I'm sure they repeat themselves umpteen time's, and they're unaware of the fact they're dancing a waltz with the conspiracy theorists.
To save people sitting through an hour of this garbage, can you instead summarise the claims that have not already been debunked?
Fair enough, but here's a simple challenge, provide basic details and a timeline to the moon landing conspiracy (keep in mind there were six landings between 1969 and 1972)
Anything that goes against what our benevolent overlords tell us is a conspiracy theory.
Edit: scratch that, what conspiracy theories do you buy into?
I've no vested interests in conspiracy theories, although you seem to buy into them a lot more than I do.
Right.
Some people will accept anything by people who have qualifications as the truth.
If you look back at how the Catholic church held sway, it's easy to see how society can be told anything and people will not question it.
Follow the leader, we're your truth. Don't trust anyone else etc etc
Ho do you know it's garbage if you are too lazy or ignorant to watch?
This topic could have its own thread, probably does already. This thread asks the questions are there any CT you think could be true. I didn't say I believe the moon landing didn't happen, I said after watching several videos on the topic they make several strong arguments.
Yup, right here on this forum and currently active
https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055822925/moon-landing-hoax/p15
Thank you, I'll take a look.
Show the evidence that ivermectin was as effective as the vaccines. This should be interesting.
It’s obvious that you don’t understand what sealioning is. However that is not surprising.
What truth is coming out? Where’s the evidence of whatever this truth is?
Whenever you’re finished with the personal attacks, you might try discussing conspiracy theories.
Ivermectin was one of those ridiculous things like the nigerian prince emails, those that believe it really don't know any better and were incapable of any critical thought about it (particularly when their favourite politicians pushed it).
It was off patent and cheap to make, yet no startup or established pharma went to produce it for the minor cost of a properly run trial (which would also grant them exclusivity on it for a period of time). That Dexamethasone was similarly off patent and cheap to produce and was approved (after a trial) is completely lost on those people.
Personal attack's ???
Where is the personal attack?
You're also back seat modding too, telling me what I should be posting.
So your claims are BS. Ivermectin is not effective, whereas the vaccines are. Thank you for confirming.
I never said ivermectin was effective. You're trying to bullshit your way out of your lie.
You never responded to me asking where was the personal attack.
Because I've wasted too much precious time going down similar rabbit-holes in the past, and the "evidence" never even approaches being convincing. I'm convinced now that posting links to long videos is a conpiracy theorist tactic to deter people from actually examining the (lack of) evidence and that many posting them have never even viewed the videos fully themselves and are instead just taking the word of the people who provided the links.
I shouldn't have to do an hour's homework in order to make your case. If it's so compelling, provide a bulleted list of the most compelling points with stand and end timestamps so people can go straight to them.
You said that it was as effective as the vaccine. Are you denying you said that in post #1359. Seeing that the vaccines have proven to be effective you are claiming that ivermectin is too.
A question dodger such as yourself is in no position to demand answers.
Yep..I was right, pure ignorance. The videos, if you bothered your backside to watch even the first 2 minutes you'd know are documentaries highlighting how ridiculous the conspiracy theories in question are and how mentally disturbed a lot of these groups are. So no need to bullet point any compelling lists or timestamps.
As for you ignorantly calling me a conspiracy theorist using the usual tactics that is just pure an utter laziness and ignorance again. Read the posts back again slowly this time, this thread, incase you also glossed over that, is asking if there are any conspiracy theories we find believable.
My response, again read it back slowly, was that I thought most come from a mental illness (which the first two videos highlight) and that if I were to forced to pick one, after watching several videos with an open mind, I felt that the moon landing conspiracy theorists made several strong arguments. Never said I believed the moon landing was staged, only that if I were to choose one. Now pull your horns in fella and read the posts back nice and slow so you understand them ok.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4781b34abcdc100dc96f5c22e41cff29.svg)
