Can you imagine the mileage the Russian propagandists would get if US, UK etc dug 1950s and 1960s tanks out of storage to send to Ukraine?
Not good enough for their own armies, but they don't mind sending inadequately armed or armoured death traps to Ukranian cannon fodder!
But somehow it's a coup if Russia does that for its own troops!
The more modern Ukranian tractors had more reliable engines... explains a lot now.
Well I guess the "Anglo-Saxon perverts" better finish this war quickly before Russia collapses.
Are we going to keep repeating versions of Russia’s keening for the days when it was a superpower?
Somebody pass Meddy some kleenex
Also
https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/987814-ukraine-bombs-russian-base-near-occupied-nuclear-plant
Some indications Ukraine is gaining ground....but all very non-commital on whether they lost an entire brigade or not as Russia is claiming
Did you know the Syrian army used Panzer 4s in the Golan heights in 1967? Now those tanks in contrast to the Russian rust buckets were actually maintained but the were absolutely shreaded by the IDF, oddly a Panzer 4 in 1967 was not as badly outdated as the 1980s Russian buckets are now.
According to an Arabic news site .
Hmmmmm but the IAEA didn't mention it all yesterday or today....
I wonder why 🤔
So no actual evidence to back up your claim of an attack on the nuclear power plant.
A Russian base near occupied plant.
Right then.
That must be why, as per previous post... the IAEA didn't mention it all yesterday or today.
some say this war is a direct result of the breakup of the superpower that was the Soviet Union and this war may lead to the dissolution of Russia, now thats an event we may not all survive
Scraping the barrel one Arabic and one Pakistan outlet,
So no evidence of your claim
I really do hope he has cancer tbh
Why?
well, people do have a habit of dying
ah come on now, you said:
"The Ukrainian army apparently attacked the power plant just as the inspection team was in the area.
International Atomic agency spokesman confirmed same"
the quote from the Ukranian army source in your linked article says:
"Targeted strikes by our troops in the localities of Energodar and Kherson have destroyed three artillery systems of the enemy as well as an ammunition depot,” the Ukrainian army said."
nothing about the power plant being attacked, and nothing from the IAEA confirming it (as it didn't happen). i'm not sure if it's intentional or not, but it's posting this kind of bullshit that will get you labelled a putin-bot, it's complete fabrication
I'm trying to find other sources for the video .
Here is one
can you plot a scenario where we all die?
So making a statement of fact and now admitting to trying to find evidence after you made the post?
That does not serve to enhance your credibility.
No that's the video. I'm trying to find another source that's not through Facebook. Not everyone has Facebook etc.
Cool your jets
if Russia dissolves and all their nuclear weapons are used up, a nuclear winter will descend and wipe us all out
Whoa… hold your horses. How does Russia break up and why do they use their nuclear weapons? I can’t see a plausible scenario.
Fake video on Facebook.
Time for a Beer 🍻
read to the end, no shortcuts
Hypothetical .....
Come on now ,
sorry, but that video tells doesn't confirm anything. the person asks the question quoting the Russian Defence Ministry, but (like most Russian claims) the Defence Ministry didn't actual offer up any evidence that the attack happened. all they said was they 'neutralised' Ukranian saboteurs.
the guy answering the question gives a politicians answer, probably cognizant of the fact that offending Russia (or calling their claim bullshit) could endanger the visiting IAEA team
if there really was a crack squad of 60 saboteurs taken out, you'd imagine they'd have had plenty of (maybe western provided) equipment, tools, etc. on them the Russians could present as evidence, and at least even try to substantiate their own claim. but no, another outlandish claim, and zero evidence, same old story...
I'd imagine a full on assault on a nuclear power plant with the IAEA inspection team on site would have been captured in images or on video or the ensuring gun battle would have been captured and the direct aftermath .
Global think tanks and military analysis organisations are dismissed as being wrong
Representatives of the International Atomic agency words are dismissed with a "probably " followed by a made up scenario .
This is a farcical thread lads.
One guy even cried "fake video".
Remember Trump used to do that when something was reported he didn't like. "Fake news"
When Russia made it attack on Kyiv all there trucks etc on Tyres started to break down. The reason was these trucks has sat for years in army depot's unmoving. They were supposed to be moved every week probably to prevent the tyres from decaying. As well the type should have been replaced at intervals.
If they couldn't f@@king maintain modern trucks what do you think 40-80 year old tanks are like. As well the Ukrainians have destroyed 1000+ of there most modern tanks what do you think will happen to 40+ year old tanks even if they can get them into action.
There Amata tank was supposed to go into production over two years ago. I think they have manufactured three.
Give us another laugh
Followed this channel on youtube a while and he has been pretty spot on and neutral when it comes to news from the frontline in Ukraine.
He is claiming Russia have lost 2000 soldiers and 80 tanks so far in the offensive.
I guess we will get reports coming out in the next few day,anyway if thats the case,Russia are taking heavy losses
All the tyres on the trucks broke down.
The **** tyres made it all the way from Russia and once they reached kiev all of the tyres broke down.