This dude's been just about banned from every social media site/app. Not good for him at all.
What does everyone else think of this controversial character?
accurate though.
Its a standard response on boards quite a narrow minded lot to be honest i take it with a pinch of salt and in fact i just laugh at the quality of the people who are watching their world & freedoms dissolve while they march for all the wrong reasons. I do appreciate your remark thank you .
That’s a very condescending post
I don’t even have to know anything about this guy to know this is bollox
Why are you defending this scum?
Your posts are tragic but I’m afraid that’s as operatic as they get.
...
never heard of him.
op should have made some kind of summary. instead of saying what do you think of (random name).
It's clear what his behaviour was. It's not a good look to be defending him.
I appreciate you're in denial to stick it to "woke" people, but it's OK, plenty of non woke people take issue with his behaviour.
The point of that joke in The Simpsons was to take the piss out of when people use children to play on people's emotions for no reason.
It was not referring to situations when there are legitimate grounds for compassion towards a child. Like this case. Mocking that child is not a good look from you.
His own posts bullying and belittling the parents of a sick child were screenshotted and posted. His own posts. No one elses.
The only hit job done on him, was done by himself.
#bluehairdont care #be kind
If you think it's a bit out of order to be mocking people with sick children you're a blue haired woke midwit 👍🏻
Apart from the human trafficking of course.
But I'm not talking about the be kind brigade. I'm talking about normal folk who just disagree with cruelty and hateful rhetoric.
You're confusing decency and empathy with woke. If someone taunts the parent of a very ill child... it's just normal to object to such behaviour. It's not solely the preserve of woke people with blue hair. Don't be a "mid wit" yourself.
And you would object to such disturbing and damaging rhetoric about women from a muslim or a trans woman.
Think for yourself. Just because "woke" people (along with most others) condemn him, don't defend the right to a platform for a severely misogynistic mocker of a parent with a very ill child, and who operates a scam business. It's not a good look.
So no, it's not the "T&C" - it's his own behaviour. Personal responsibility.
Freedom of speech (not free speech - no such thing, people have never been able to publish/broadcast absolutely anything they feel like) does not cover bullying and hatred. Freedom of speech isn't in the remit of a private company either - although they should allow for diverse views... but they aren't the state.
People on the right however, need to stop wearing lack of compassion as a badge of honour though, just because it's the edgy, non woke thing to do. That's for young children.
Whether he has broken any laws is irrelevant. Their ball, their rules.
It’s called the “miracle of the free market,” pal. If you don’t like a private enterprise’s terms and conditions then you are the “woke” one for pressuring them to change it. How ironic, woke-hoisted upon your own woke-petard.
Andrew Tate boasts about pimping women out, I’m fairly certain that’s illegal anyway.
He's clearly an individual with one, or more likely several, Cluster B Personality Disorders.
Nonetheless, that doesn't mean the rest of humanity are obliged to put up with his crazy guff.
No harm to have his Internet presence removed forever. Let him howl at the moon.
I've known of Tate for a while and my opinion of him is low. He is Trump for the adolescent. He does quite a good job of presenting as smart, as erudite and almost philosophical, but? Much like Trump with a Sharpie, or Boris with his bombastic love of Greek and veneer of intellect...
It's shallow, a puddle with no great depth to plumb nor new knowledge to reveal. It is insidious tho, I have an 18y.o son and the widespread adoption of Tate's mantra is something I am aware of. He's got good social media, pumps out a good soundbite and grifts...
Jordan Peterson for the TikTok generation, a philosopher he ain't.
I'd never heard of him before today but now we have two different threads about him?
This is not their point of view on the issue they have claimed they are not liable for what is saod on their platform as they are an amenity. Amenities don't get to dictate free speech.
All the other stuff I don't care
TopG
An unrelenting tosser.
Joe Rogan is a bullying POS. Google “Joe Rogan primatologist” and listen for yourself.
I’ve been aware of Tate for a few years. It’s strange to see him go from this obscure laughing stock to the new internet bogeyman #momo2022
Rogan is a dick to numerous people. Google Joe Rogan and bully and take your pick from there.
listen to the clip online where he abuses the qualified primatologist who tries to correct one of his fake stories and say that’s not bullying.
I would not see any added value in the opinions of someone like that.
What has Rogan done that's bullying?
Peterson was a dick to that swimwear lady all right - just remembered that now, sorry. But are there no points at all made by him that you'd agree with?
Yes they absolutely are.
Toxic bullies.
Were you also not being literal when you said "give me them before this awful scumbag any day" because, again, that is a very low bar.
I wasn't being literal. What I mean is they're nowhere near as horrendous as they're made out to be.
"Don't always get it wrong " is a very low bar
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w2.vanillicon.com/v2/2c24cbeac11f913da9e0b21923b8fc98.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wa.vanillicon.com/v2/a605da6df673e065ac5a7e976411f425.svg)