Following on from
this thread
Please remain civil or posting privileges will be removed
You caused no offence. BA sees offence in the slightest. I spent 2 years more or less in lockdown because of serious health issues and I was lucky enough to have great mental health. What I do not want is some clown saying I should grow vegetables on my balcony. How is growing some veg or plants or having a hardware shop open going to help me?
It also worth noting that Eamon Ryan also wanted to being wolves back into the Irish ecosystem.
BA if the slightest things offends you then maybe you shouldn't be on here. It's obvious when you can't argue back you go into offended outrage mode.
Farmers wanted nothing more than 22% (and even then, that was thought of as too high)
It was called a compromise.
Ireland is a democracy, no one party has a dictatorship over the people. The main opposition party will come to know this in the fullness of time.
And the FF, FG rural TD's wanted 22%....
Its called a compromise Francie.
a) tell us their opinion on the target themselves because they have to wait for what An Phoblacht has to say first is telling
b ) if these targets mean nothing why are farmers worried
c) if these targets mean nothing why are people posting in this thread like lunatics?
So why are you posting in this thread about emissions reductions if you are not interested in the topic?
Entertainment value? Screenshots? Nothing else to do?
Amazing, talk to your pals Francie and Dempo as they think the Greens lost.
Both not members of FG as FG had not formed. When will we get the Eoin O'Duffy Pin?
You seem to put your foot in it on a regular basis Dempo.
Maybe think before you post.
Thanks for that 😏 I of course know about your own health challenges and I take Mental health as a topic , very seriously. I was appalled that BA could steep so low and even the most ardent of Green supporters must have been embarrassed by that seeds, window baskets and salad speech, infact the brief mention of mental health by ER was actually offence in the context of the utter nonsense he spouted 👍
Early days. Targets mean nothing without a detailed plan.
Point me to a Housing or Health or Construction plan that ever hit it's target under FFG Governments since 2000.
25% reduction in Agriculture emissions without reducing the herd???! How then???
Impossible.
No interested Marko , I think we all know how Vulgar the accusation was , only made more repugnant by you actually believing such offensive nonsense.
Marko, it is you, Blanch, and BA who put their foot in it on a regular basis. The last government supporter who put their foot in it regularly Maryanne 84 has skedaddled to other threads on here.
one might say he was 'howling at the moon'
It's all because governments can never do anything right!! As commented above it's neither the high number nor the low numbers floated. It's a deal and a good start if everyone can be signed up. The really hard stuff is ahead, the how and the tracking of what's going on. It will now be a de facto policy for any new government, which could be problematic for those who have no policies nor no great interest in this area.
Well said , it's just nauseating at this stage 😏
Wilful naivety again. All buddies seeking compromise to save de planet. Eh? ROFL
It's boiling my piss that they can get away with it. How many squirrels have they pointed out at this stage.
I'm actually still in shock , bad enough the outrageous comment, them me advising of my own history , delicately and further vicious bile , I just wonder at times what goes through people's mind that they could be so incentive, even a bit of satire winds then up .
You must be the only one that imagined it would come in at 22%. Three days of haggling showed that was not going to happen.
That’s as good a summing up of that I’ve seen, thanks 🙂
Back up , we're have I ever said 22% 🤔 I've honestly very little knowledge of this contrived nonsense, I mentioned yesterday I thought 30% was the original figure and then 25% , not sure what your referring to me saying anything about 22% , I'm really not terribly interested in this particular topic , actually bored to tears by it
Why are you posting on it then?
You did suggest that ER was a winner here, it's really a collective government decision.
Interesting that only a Dulbin FF TD is quoted.
Brazil to increase size of its national herd by 24 million.
https://www.farmersjournal.ie/brazil-s-herd-to-surge-by-24m-head-642345
Regards...jmcc
it’s not almost everyone. A huge amount of people are fully aware these decision had to be made.
The government has to make these calls, end of story. Some people will never like and some will just moan about everything.
They can’t be like the flip flopping that goes on in opposition who can never make a decision or guve an opinion in case someone doesn’t like it.
Not sure why you think it’s an achievement because you drove a person off a thread. This thread should be a place for everyone to discuss the government. 🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
Welcome, not seen you before , explain to me why you require me to explain to you what I can and cannot post on , genuinely curious were you got the notion you can do that .
Incidently, I was clearly mixed up with someone else .
I drove nobody of a thread so stop putting in words in my mouth. I encourage open debate in here but it's obvious that certain members who can't debate openly and honestly resort to visiting their squirrel sanctuary. If you are losing your argument, admit it and move on.
So you encourage open debate once they have the same opinion as you? Or you deem they should be on the thread? 🤷♂️
Personally I don’t see why anyone should be driven off a thread, I have my own opinion and don’t feel the need to be a parrot and just agreeing with the rest
Maryanne seemed to be similar and had her own opinion and I guess why some thought they should drive her off the thread
‘I'm really not terribly interested in this particular topic , actually bored to tears by it’
I guess this was a clue…
Its cause she's a woman they pushed her off the thread, disgraceful stuff etc etc
