Following on from
this thread
Please remain civil or posting privileges will be removed
My post is fairly straight forward. What part are you struggling with?
"They said it was not their account. I politely said it would be a good idea to remove the tweet as it contained personal information from that other user.
Do you not think that is a good idea?"
Thanks Francie, I've clarified my position on privacy, I as good as admitted it was me, I was just curious of the sudden interest in my Twitter history which is utterly boring, 70 odd posts, no hidden agenda's, mostly fun and I'm reasonably well known on Boards, really an average Joe, not controversial etc etc almost boring 😉
What?
Now your being disingenuous, I was playing with you. You knew full well its my account, I have admitted as much , but you've helpfully admitted you've taken an interest in me which is curious.
Not only have I nothing to hide, I'm not brain dead, I'm actually known by many on Boards, I don't hide behind numerous accounts, I have one, have only ever had one, I'm a perfectly ordinary person, not terribly exciting, indeed there's even pictures of me on another thread.
People in life choose to be anonomous, that is their entitlement and I respect it deeply. I've no dark mysterious history I've to hide, it's who I am, I often laugh at accusations I'm particular people, have numerous accounts, if the people only knew.
Anyway, I certainly learned something tonight and thank you for that 😉
They said it was not their account. I politely said it would be a good idea to remove the tweet as it contained personal information from that other user.
Do you not think that is a good idea?
I respect privacy and was was giving a friendly heads up that braindead Twitter user you dumped that tweet to here has no clue on how to use Twitter thats all.
I suggested removing their tweet as a quick 30 second look at their posting history they have provided every detail including name, address, DOB, etc on a public forum.
But don't worry as you said it's a parody account so it's all good.
Post on his feed. Otherwise assume he is comfortable with it. Why you would be trawling his previous posts is odd though, were you looking for more funnies like the one he posted?
I'm honestly not trying to attack you, seriously, you've said the person has posted their personal details previously, which they've not and they might be concerned their Tweet or public information is shared here 🤔
Its a. Personal account, random user name, not personal details, phone numbers, email addresses visible and why your interest 🤔 if it were some public representation, high profile person, celeb sure but I'm baffled at your interest in a really quite mundane user,, that's all
Their profile is private.
Would you not be better sending him a DM? Maybe he has no issue posting his details?
I give up at this stage.
The Twitter user you linked to here posted all of their personal details publicly previously. I was trying to give a heads up you should remove the tweet buts sure attack me instead.
A so your following the User is it, very few posts, hasn't shared any personal details, has commented on various stories, Topics, certainly nothing controversial, including one earlier querying a silly comment from Mary Lou and indeed MM, Follows a few people but really a random occasional user. Why would such a person gain such attention from you, just curious 🤔
As I said originally it would be a good idea to delete that tweet you posted from some random Twitter user as they appear to not understand how to use the platform and have posted all their details in public in past tweets. That's all.
Honestly, I'm really not sure what your concern is here, there's no public information, sensitive or otherwise shared, if there is something I'm missing enlighten me, not offer cyprtic guidance, I'm sure if I've done something wrong or inappropriate it will be pointed out to me 🤔
So you wont answer 2 simple questions? Even 1? No honour.
Let me simplify for you...We were talking about expense fraud but you brought in O'Snodaigh's theft (even though you did not even name him).
I allowed it to be included in the list because I knew you would run off crying otherwise. He's on the list now.
Here is the list: Alan Farrell (FG), Maria Bailey (FG) Michelle Mulherin (FG) Jerry Buttimer (FG) Dara Murphy (FG) Hugh McElvaney (FG) Ivor Callely (FF) Ned O'Keefe (FF) Eamon Scanlon (FF) Joe Queenan (FF) Jerry Lundy (FF) Bertie Ahern (FF) Charlie Haughey (FF) P Flynn (FF) Niall Blaney (FF) O'Snodaigh (SF)
There he is on the list (last one). So you can possible stop waffling and meet me half way?
So now the 2 simple questions (and you can include cartridge theft if you wish) are;
Q1. Have FFG changed the expense rules given the widespread abuse?
A. For BA
Q2. Who has been in government for the past 20 years and can legislate against all the expense fraud?
I'm not saying anymore and let you figure it out for yourself.
Like this just posted 😁
What public information are you referring to 🤔 it's a Joke, Parody account, I suspect most people know that. There's no public information posted on the account but comments which are Hillarious, if there was public info shared, isn't the fact its actually public information mean its publically available anyway 🤔
It's pretending to be insulted, scolding the other poster and indignantly refusing to deal with the point they made. Your go to tactic to try and dig yourself out of a hole you dug yourself.
See if you can just answer this question with a yes or no:
Do you accept it was the government who extended the time for the MOC to one hour?
Might be a good idea for the sake of that Twitter poster you delete that post.
These is a lot of public information posted on that account. I doubt they would be too happy with you sharing it here.
"dodging", "deflection" 😫
This thread is supposed to be a debate.
Sorry but I have no idea what "preachy righteousness" is? Is that like constantly telling everyone they are wrong or lying?
You can keep saying I'm twisting your posts but we both know that's code for you dodging. Runaway BA.
😁 Do you really believe this type of preachy righteousness digs you out of the holes you dig for yourself?
The government wasted the time by extending the MOC to an hour. Fact.
No, it was only after I pointed it out you "dealt with the O'Snodaigh theft"
So from post number 1 the whole argument was gone because you showed you had no interest in the issue.....
In terms of your "questions". No thanks, but keep up the little comments about strangers on the web 👍️
"squirm"
😂
Seriously do you actually believe that?
More gymnastics. The last time twisting my posts didn't really work out for you so not sure why you think trying to do it again will work this time.
As always my posts are clear and concise. No need for you to try twist them. 👍️
If you can't have a proper discussion on the topics no need to quote me, cheers
I am here. You can reply to me directly you know. Don't be afraid. I dealt with the O'Snodaigh theft and said he should be jailed. I was open and honest.
Some of the list I had even had their own tribunals.
Any chance of answering the questions I posed? A little quid pro quo instead of the waffle perhaps?
They actually extended the amount of time given to the MOC.
Plenty of time to vote on their own pay and conditions too.
Oh I know. The aim is to see the squirm. He is starting to see the real world.
Do you have problem with the people who have damaged homes due to mica? Do you have a problem with members of the public speaking up for their own interests? Is it the public or democracy or both you don't like?
The theme seems to be, anything goes for big business looking to increase their profits, let bank branches close, more data centers if needed (C02 whatever), but if the public start looking out for themselves they need to be ridiculed and attacked.
Again, it was the government's own MOC that was discussed in the Dail. Was that the pointless time wasting?
So as well as your non existent examples of opposition parties blocking housing for no reason, we can add to that your waffle about the long laundry list of FF/FG on the take, leaving out others. Your waffle betrays you several times a day BA.
Pretending not to know that means avoiding the fact that we do the banks favours and ask for nothing. All MM will do is give out.
I clarified with no corporation tax and two different newspapers who mentioned this.
