nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

So "X" - nothing to see here. Elon's in control - Part XXX

If Elon Musk buys Twitter that Clown Trump will be back on it as Elon Musk is a supporter of him. That is not good.

I will admit Elon Musk has done some great things like Tesla and Space X but am not a fan of how he goes about things or that he supports that Clown Trump.

I really hope for all out sakes that Twitter do not sell to him but with the offer he has made them it's likely the loss making platform will sell to him.

What does everyone here think of this?

Are you a supporter of Musk?

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119316227#Comment_119316227

Do you think a super-smart business guy should have made sure he got proper access to the data he needed BEFORE making an offer, not after?

It was over-valued BY HIM.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119316055#Comment_119316055

That's true when buying your penny sweets in the shop. It gets a little bit more complicated when there are legally binding contracts signed and agreed to by both parties which includes particular clauses resulting in money owed under certain conditions.

And considering the clauses in the contract relate to billions of dollars, I'm sure it's going to take a lot more than Elon claiming "When you agree to buy something you don't owe any money right away. You owe money only after the other party has delivered that something to you. At this point in this deal neither party hasn't delivered anything yet so I don't owe anything."

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119316423#Comment_119316423

He can probably still afford it, but it would have a big impact on stock and shares of his other companies, could possibly trigger loans and agreements regarding those companies, and I think I read that the downward spiral of Bitcoin, Binance etc could also have impacted Elon's financing a bit.

It would be wonderful to see Mr. Self-Aggrandisement have to complete the deal.

A big willy-waving escapade, during which his only goal was to hoodwink conservatives and 'own the libs'.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119316477#Comment_119316477

Tesla, by his own admission is losing billions, due to supply chain and other issues and the share price is way down on the last year. It's definitely not the same collateral as it was.

Royale with Cheese

Elon Musk is such a massive fúcking bellend. Absolutely can't stand him. Would be delighted to see him forced to go through with this deal.

That's all I wanted to say.

I used to think quite highly of Musk, seeming a canny, forward thinking entrepreneur with his eye on tomorrow. Shows what I know, or indeed, Musk. Maybe if he had have kept his mouth shut I'd still respect the man; perhaps stayed off Twitter, ironically, the world might have still thought highly of him. Social Media seems to overinflate people's belief in the value of their own opinions. While this entire venture, alongside things like his inane Las Vegas car tunnel, calls into question his actual business acumen

SpaceX's reusable rockets are still pretty neat.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119316459#Comment_119316459

Maybe he is under a contractual obligation to complete the deal, or maybe he isn't, but he doesn't owe anything and neither Twitter and its shareholders. Saying that he does implies that he got the shares / ownership and now he refuses to pay, which is not true. But we're splitting hairs, so I'll stop.

Quite strange amount of hate for the most successful African ever though.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119319694#Comment_119319694

He is under a contractual obligation to complete the deal, because that's what the deal was. You're arguing that he hasn't received the shares therefore he doesn't owe any money. That's a ridiculously simplistic argument. We're talking about billions of dollars. The shares aren't just handed over and then you transfer the money.

https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-to-take-elon-musk-court-fight-close-deal-2022-7?r=US&IR=T

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119319694#Comment_119319694

Quite strange amount of hate for the most successful African ever though.

That’s a poor attempt 😁

Musk isn’t hated because he grew up in a wealthy white family in South Africa, moved to Canada and claimed Canadian citizenship through his Canadian born mother because it would be easier to enter into the US where he became a citizen of the United States…

People just don’t like the way he goes on for a whole variety of reasons, not least the fact that while he is unquestionably financially successful, he’s just not the brilliant engineer or entrepreneur other people make him out to be. The world’s most successful troll after Trump, would be a more apt description if you were interested in quantifying his success. The most successful South African IMO is Nelson Mandela, under who’s leadership apartheid ended in South Africa and he introduced democracy, something Musk talks about, but doesn’t know the meaning of the word.

It’s a good thing for Africans that while Musk was successful in trolling American investors, he was unsuccessful in convincing anyone who isn’t a complete dullard, that he actually gave a damn about the right to freedom of speech or freedom of expression that didn’t conform to his own ideas -

https://www.justsecurity.org/81357/what-elon-musk-does-not-get-about-twitter-and-democracy-in-africa/

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119319694#Comment_119319694

What Musk owes is ultimately up to the courts but the working reality is down here in the economic trenches, a handshake sale was agreed along with a price. Twitter are entitled to chase that price both parties agreed; that Musk offered over the odds with liquidity it looks like he didn't have isn't Twitter's problem. When it comes to corporations, tire kicking isn't easily ignored or walked away from. Blather about bots is a thin excuse.

Musk is a spoofer high on his own supply; the chatter over liberal tears a smokescreen to the simple reality of an "eccentric" billionaire who seems to think he can behave like a crazy person without consequence. His actions have been increasingly erratic, this Twitter acquisition the latest and largest.

The African line is a weird flex. He could be from Antarctica for all it matters, and his being a Canadian citizen since 17 muddies the waters from that kind of weird reduction.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119313035#Comment_119313035

At the very least he owes Twitter $1Bn in a break fee if he decides to walk away. That was the deal he agreed to

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119315742#Comment_119315742

No - Musk explicitly decided to NOT carry out due diligence which is what any other deal of this size does.

That is where conversations about Bots etc. are supposed to happen and would have given him the opportunity to walk away.

Because of him being arrogant and rushing into the deal acting all Billy Big Balls , Musk has legally crippled himself.

As a result , there are only two outcomes here.

Musk walks away and pays the break fee, or he pays the full price like he agreed.

He won't get a discount and he won't walk away without paying.

And , it's all entirely self-inflicted.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119320130#Comment_119320130

It wasn't just a handshake deal.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119319694#Comment_119319694

Hmm, you might want to learn a bit about contract law… it does not work like that.

I very much doubt he ever intended to actually buy Twitter, it was one of his attention seeking larks that got out of hand and the bots nonsense is an attempt to get out of it. The problem with billion dollar valuations is that it’s very hard to turn them into actual cash and this is Twitter’s opportunity to do so. Don’t expect them to walk away easily and depending on the courts we may get to know the true value of these companies - the amount of cash people are actually willing to hand over.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119320513#Comment_119320513

Agreed. Things like Twitter are only worth what someone is willing to pay for them. Musk didn't just make an offer out of nowhere. He increasingly bought more and more shares in the company to give himself better leverage, then made several offers to buy the whole company outright. He very publicly stated that his last offer was his best and final offer, and the rest of the shareholders agreed to sell. A contract was then agreed and signed by both parties.

Musk is now trying to get out of that contract. If he had concerns about bots etc, he should have raised that during negotiations for the deal, however he neglected to do that due diligence. He agreed to and signed the contract, so he has agreed to buy Twitter as it is for the agreed price.

I believe the 1bn termination fee is no longer really relevant as that seems to have been related to if there was a significant reason why Musk could not fulfill the deal (eg. Provable issue regarding funding the deal). However by publicly making I about the level of bots on the site, unless he can prove Twitter was knowingly and purposefully lying in all their previous submissions (whereas it seems their reporting tends to be based on regular, random, small samples), changing his mind due to the level of bots is not a reason for Musk to terminate the deal under the contract.

He agreed to and signed a contract without doing due diligence and without including adequate provisions to allow him to back out of the deal. Rather, Twitter made sure to include provisions to make sure Musk completes the deal. He seems pretty screwed.

All because he wanted to be Johnny Bigballs and flash his cash about trying to buy Twitter for ego/publicity.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1546344529460174849?s=21&t=7M0FWu7WR4MmRzak6w1Clw

From the man himself.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119316756#Comment_119316756

He is a bellend and I also would like to see him brought down a peg or two. But he has contributed to our world in a way that very few people have. Tesla, Starlink and SpaceX are simply remarkable technological achievements (I would not have the lifestyle that I have right now without Starlink)

He can blather and blowhard all he wants on there but a large number extremely dry lawyers & legal types are going to get rich out of his shitshow.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119320951#Comment_119320951

a smart person would have asked for the bot info before agreeing to spend 44Bn.

Jesus, he is making an absolute holy show of himself.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119321027#Comment_119321027

He alleges he did and Twitter refused to furnish him with it.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119321056#Comment_119321056

and yet he still made a binding offer? pull the other one.

Royale with Cheese

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119320992#Comment_119320992

I own one of his cars and I'm quite fond of it, can't stand the man himself though.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119320992#Comment_119320992

SpaceX revolutionised space travel, Tesla a market leader normalising electric cars - but in many respects this is the problem. Musk strikes as someone who thought a couple of innovations meant every brainfart was a winner, every idea of quantitative value. The Vegas car tunnel is such hubris, a collosal waste of money and has no practical application for what it is - and makes me suspect Tesla and SpaceX were flukes. The solar powered roof tiles were a neat idea mind you, must see where they went.

While his "no fúcks given" attitude makes him obnoxious rather than charming (though no doubt appealing to some). We could all be full of swagger with his wealth and clout.

Like many in his class he presents as having poor impulse control, to the extent he picked a fight with the director of the World Food Programme after another boast. And in a move very similar to the Twitter farce, has failed to pony up the $6 billion promised, with the convenience that the WFP didn't supply the data he dared them to supply. As said, he's a spoofer.

https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/un-official-still-hopes-musk-will-step-up-fight-world-hunger-2022-05-23/

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119320951#Comment_119320951

So his justification for signing the Twitter deal, buying billions worth of shares, leveraging parts of his existing companies to fund it, and likely having to pay billions in damages if it goes to court is... Twitter might have to release more info on the number of bot accounts?

I'd actually have more respect for him if he just said "I did it for sh*ts and giggles".

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119321322#Comment_119321322

I think when you add in Starlink and, as you said, the solar powered roof tiles, they can’t be described as flukes. But, yes, his arrogance now knows no bounds. What did it for me was the farce with him trying to get his submarine used in the rescue of those kids from the cave in Thailand, and then trying to ruin the guy, the absolute hero, who actually rescued them.

What he’s done to date has progressed such that they’re now established businesses that can run without him. It’s difficult to see him coming up with much more of practical use given that he now seems to live in, and spoof from, a parallel universe

This will drag on for years in court. He can probably buy shares below the offer price in batches and technical close the deal. Not a good luck for anything else he wants to buy. You can’t claim a grandiose gesture as a proponent of free speech and turn about and say ‘lolz, to the moon’.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119321056#Comment_119321056

He might have , but he asked for it AFTER he agreed to the deal and AFTER he declined to run everything through due diligence.

Whether or not he feels they haven't answered his question fully , from a legal standpoint doesn't matter one bit.

He agreed a deal and a price without any caveats (i.e. no due diligence) so he is locked into those terms.

Which are - A $1Bn break fee if he wants to walk away or he hands over the full boat and then owns Twitter.

Everything else is just him showboating and whining.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119321850#Comment_119321850

From what I understand the 1bn break fee might not be applicable because Musk can complete the deal, he's just choosing not to. So he could be liable for the difference between current share value and what he was going to pay (which amounts to approx 16bn), or strike a deal with Twitter for less than that in arbitration (likely at least 5bn).

All to prove Twitter has bot accounts. Something everyone already knew, and the majority didn't care about.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/119321927#Comment_119321927

The Bots thing is a canard.

I remain convinced that this started out as another Pump & Dump exercise then a bit of arrogance and hubris kicked in and he went for it, not seeing the collapse in tech stocks coming which hit him hard on both sides of the deal in terms of his available cash and the market value of Twitter.

Having eschewed all the normal elements of a deal of this nature he left himself with no easy out so he ramped up the whining about Bots , which like you said every dog in the street has aware of for as long as Twitter has been a thing.

He's looking for a way out of a corner that he painted himself into and I really don't think that the courts (especially in Delaware) are going to give him an easy exit.

It's going to cost him money and not just the lost stock value since he bought into Twitter.